Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Azure Cosmos DB vs Google Cloud Bigtable: What are the differences?
Key Differences between Azure Cosmos DB and Google Cloud Bigtable
Azure Cosmos DB and Google Cloud Bigtable are two popular NoSQL databases that offer different features and capabilities. Here are the key differences between them:
Data Model: Azure Cosmos DB uses a multi-model database approach, allowing developers to choose from a variety of data models including document, key-value, columnar, graph, and time-series. On the other hand, Google Cloud Bigtable is a wide-column store that is optimized for storing large amounts of data in a sparse table format.
Scalability: Azure Cosmos DB is designed to provide global scalability out of the box, with the ability to replicate data across multiple regions for high availability and low latency access. It offers built-in horizontal scaling and automatic partitioning of data. In contrast, Google Cloud Bigtable is also scalable but requires manual sharding to distribute data across multiple instances.
Consistency Models: Azure Cosmos DB supports multiple consistency models, including strong, bounded staleness, session, consistent prefix, and eventual consistency. This allows developers to choose the appropriate consistency level based on their application requirements. Google Cloud Bigtable, on the other hand, only provides eventual consistency.
Query Language: Azure Cosmos DB supports SQL-like queries using its SQL API, as well as MongoDB's query language, Cassandra Query Language (CQL), and Gremlin (a graph traversal language). This provides flexibility for developers to write complex queries using familiar syntax. In contrast, Google Cloud Bigtable does not support SQL-like queries and requires developers to use its low-level API for data access.
Managed Service: Azure Cosmos DB is a fully managed database service, providing automatic backups, patching, and automatic scaling. It also offers global distribution capabilities for low latency access. On the other hand, Google Cloud Bigtable requires more manual configuration and management, such as setting up and managing instances, clusters, and backups.
Integration with Other Services: Azure Cosmos DB integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, such as Azure Functions, Azure Logic Apps, and Azure Event Grid. This enables developers to build end-to-end solutions using a wide range of services. Google Cloud Bigtable integrates well with other Google Cloud Platform services, such as BigQuery, Dataflow, and Pub/Sub.
In Summary, Azure Cosmos DB offers a multi-model database approach with global scalability, multiple consistency models, and strong integration with other Azure services. Google Cloud Bigtable is a wide-column store optimized for large-scale data storage, but requires more manual configuration and management.
Pros of Azure Cosmos DB
- Best-of-breed NoSQL features28
- High scalability22
- Globally distributed15
- Automatic indexing over flexible json data model14
- Tunable consistency10
- Always on with 99.99% availability sla10
- Javascript language integrated transactions and queries7
- Predictable performance6
- High performance5
- Analytics Store5
- Rapid Development2
- No Sql2
- Auto Indexing2
- Ease of use2
Pros of Google Cloud Bigtable
- High performance11
- Fully managed9
- High scalability5
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Azure Cosmos DB
- Pricing18
- Poor No SQL query support4