Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Azure Cosmos DB

576
1K
+ 1
130
GrapheneDB

14
27
+ 1
0
Add tool

Azure Cosmos DB vs GrapheneDB: What are the differences?

# Introduction

Azure Cosmos DB and GrapheneDB are both widely used NoSQL databases known for their scalability and high performance. Each platform has its own unique features and strengths that cater to different use cases.

1. **Data Model**: Azure Cosmos DB is a multi-model database that supports document, key-value, graph, and column-family data models, providing versatility in data types. On the other hand, GrapheneDB specifically focuses on graph databases, offering optimized support for graph data structures such as nodes, edges, and properties.

2. **Scalability**: Azure Cosmos DB offers global distribution with multiple consistency options, automatic scaling, and guaranteed low latency, making it suitable for globally distributed applications. In contrast, GrapheneDB is more focused on providing high availability and performance for graph workloads, specializing in graph-specific querying and traversals.

3. **Query Language**: Azure Cosmos DB uses SQL API, MongoDB API, Gremlin API, and others depending on the data model being used, providing versatility in querying approaches. GrapheneDB, being a graph database, utilizes query languages like Cypher and SPARQL optimized for graph traversal and pattern matching.

4. **Operational Management**: Azure Cosmos DB is a fully managed database service by Microsoft, handling automatic provisioning, scaling, and monitoring of the database, reducing operational overhead for users. GrapheneDB, while also offering managed services, specifically focuses on graph database management, providing optimized configurations for graph data storage and querying.

5. **Cost Structure**: Azure Cosmos DB offers a pay-as-you-go pricing model with options for reserved capacity, enabling cost optimization based on usage patterns. GrapheneDB typically operates on a subscription-based pricing structure, catering to specific graph database needs with variations in pricing based on the chosen configuration.

6. **Ecosystem Integration**: Azure Cosmos DB integrates seamlessly with other Microsoft Azure services and tools, enabling easy integration with the broader Azure ecosystem, making it convenient for users already using Azure services. GrapheneDB focuses on providing a specialized graph database solution and may offer more limited integrations compared to Azure Cosmos DB.

In Summary, Azure Cosmos DB and GrapheneDB differ in their data models, scalability options, query languages, operational management, cost structures, and ecosystem integrations, catering to diverse requirements in the NoSQL database space.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Azure Cosmos DB
Pros of GrapheneDB
  • 28
    Best-of-breed NoSQL features
  • 22
    High scalability
  • 15
    Globally distributed
  • 14
    Automatic indexing over flexible json data model
  • 10
    Tunable consistency
  • 10
    Always on with 99.99% availability sla
  • 7
    Javascript language integrated transactions and queries
  • 6
    Predictable performance
  • 5
    High performance
  • 5
    Analytics Store
  • 2
    Rapid Development
  • 2
    No Sql
  • 2
    Auto Indexing
  • 2
    Ease of use
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Azure Cosmos DB
    Cons of GrapheneDB
    • 18
      Pricing
    • 4
      Poor No SQL query support
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      What is Azure Cosmos DB?

      Azure DocumentDB is a fully managed NoSQL database service built for fast and predictable performance, high availability, elastic scaling, global distribution, and ease of development.

      What is GrapheneDB?

      With automated backups, lightning-fast provisioning, 24x7 monitoring, and best-in-class support. Available on AWS, Azure and Heroku.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Azure Cosmos DB?
      What companies use GrapheneDB?
      See which teams inside your own company are using Azure Cosmos DB or GrapheneDB.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Azure Cosmos DB?
      What tools integrate with GrapheneDB?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      What are some alternatives to Azure Cosmos DB and GrapheneDB?
      Azure SQL Database
      It is the intelligent, scalable, cloud database service that provides the broadest SQL Server engine compatibility and up to a 212% return on investment. It is a database service that can quickly and efficiently scale to meet demand, is automatically highly available, and supports a variety of third party software.
      MongoDB Atlas
      MongoDB Atlas is a global cloud database service built and run by the team behind MongoDB. Enjoy the flexibility and scalability of a document database, with the ease and automation of a fully managed service on your preferred cloud.
      MongoDB
      MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.
      Neo4j
      Neo4j stores data in nodes connected by directed, typed relationships with properties on both, also known as a Property Graph. It is a high performance graph store with all the features expected of a mature and robust database, like a friendly query language and ACID transactions.
      MySQL
      The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.
      See all alternatives