StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Big Data Tools
  5. Azure Data Factory vs Azure Pipelines

Azure Data Factory vs Azure Pipelines

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Azure Data Factory
Azure Data Factory
Stacks254
Followers484
Votes0
GitHub Stars516
Forks610
Azure Pipelines
Azure Pipelines
Stacks2.3K
Followers457
Votes14

Azure Data Factory vs Azure Pipelines: What are the differences?

Introduction

Azure Data Factory and Azure Pipelines are both essential tools in the Microsoft Azure ecosystem that serve different purposes. While Azure Data Factory is a data integration and orchestration service, Azure Pipelines focuses on continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) of applications. Understanding the key differences between these two services is crucial for making informed decisions when designing and implementing data workflow solutions in Azure.

  1. Data Integration vs. Application Deployment: The main difference between Azure Data Factory and Azure Pipelines lies in their primary use cases. Azure Data Factory enables seamless data integration from various data sources and transforms the data to meet business requirements. On the other hand, Azure Pipelines facilitates the building, testing, and deploying of applications across multiple platforms and environments.

  2. Batch Processing vs. Continuous Deployment: Azure Data Factory predominantly focuses on batch processing and orchestration of data pipelines. It provides a scalable and reliable infrastructure for scheduling and executing complex data workflows. In contrast, Azure Pipelines is specifically designed for continuous deployment, allowing developers to automate application deployments and efficiently iterate through development cycles.

  3. Visual Workflow Design vs. Code-Based Pipeline Configuration: Azure Data Factory offers a visual designer that enables users to create and configure data pipelines without the need for coding. It provides a low-code/no-code approach for building and managing complex data integration workflows. Conversely, Azure Pipelines relies on code-based configuration using YAML or JSON syntax, providing more flexibility and customization options for defining CI/CD pipelines.

  4. Data Transformation and ETL vs. Application Build and Test: Azure Data Factory excels in data transformation and extraction, transformation, and loading (ETL) processes. It supports a wide range of data integration capabilities such as data mapping, data cleansing, and data format conversion. In contrast, Azure Pipelines focuses on application build, test, and deployment tasks, providing features essential for building, testing, and deploying software applications across different platforms.

  5. Seamless Integration with Azure Services vs. Broad Platform Support: Azure Data Factory integrates seamlessly with various Azure services, including Azure Databricks, Azure Synapse Analytics, and Azure Machine Learning. It provides native connectors and integration capabilities for ingesting and processing data from different sources. In contrast, Azure Pipelines offers broad platform support, allowing the deployment of applications to different platforms like Azure, AWS, and Google Cloud.

  6. Data Orchestration and Scheduling vs. CI/CD Pipeline Execution: Azure Data Factory excels in orchestrating complex data workflows and provides comprehensive scheduling capabilities for batch processing. It offers time-based triggers, event-based triggers, and dependency-based triggers for initiating data integration processes. In contrast, Azure Pipelines focuses on executing CI/CD pipelines, constantly checking for changes in the source code repositories and triggering the relevant stages of the pipeline accordingly.

In summary, Azure Data Factory and Azure Pipelines differ in terms of their primary use cases, focus areas, workflow design approaches, integration capabilities, and execution patterns. While Azure Data Factory specializes in data integration and orchestration, Azure Pipelines is geared towards application deployment and CI/CD workflows.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Azure Data Factory, Azure Pipelines

Balaramesh
Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceonAzure PipelinesAzure Pipelines.NET.NETJenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k
Comments
Vamshi
Vamshi

Data Engineer at Tata Consultancy Services

May 29, 2020

Needs adviceonPySparkPySparkAzure Data FactoryAzure Data FactoryDatabricksDatabricks

I have to collect different data from multiple sources and store them in a single cloud location. Then perform cleaning and transforming using PySpark, and push the end results to other applications like reporting tools, etc. What would be the best solution? I can only think of Azure Data Factory + Databricks. Are there any alternatives to #AWS services + Databricks?

269k views269k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Azure Data Factory
Azure Data Factory
Azure Pipelines
Azure Pipelines

It is a service designed to allow developers to integrate disparate data sources. It is a platform somewhat like SSIS in the cloud to manage the data you have both on-prem and in the cloud.

Fast builds with parallel jobs and test execution. Use container jobs to create consistent and reliable builds with the exact tools you need. Create new containers with ease and push them to any registry.

Real-Time Integration; Parallel Processing; Data Chunker; Data Masking; Proactive Monitoring; Big Data Processing
Any language, any platform; Containers and Kubernetes; Extensible; Deploy to any cloud; Open source; Advanced workflows and features
Statistics
GitHub Stars
516
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
610
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
254
Stacks
2.3K
Followers
484
Followers
457
Votes
0
Votes
14
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 4
    Easy to get started
  • 3
    Built by Microsoft
  • 3
    Unlimited CI/CD minutes
  • 2
    Docker support
  • 2
    Yaml support
Integrations
Octotree
Octotree
Java
Java
.NET
.NET
.NET Core
.NET Core
Slack
Slack
Python
Python
Ruby
Ruby
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
.NET
.NET
Node.js
Node.js
Linux
Linux
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
RxJava
RxJava

What are some alternatives to Azure Data Factory, Azure Pipelines?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Apache Spark

Apache Spark

Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot