GitBucket vs Visual Studio Team Services

Overview

GitBucket

Stacks79

Followers177

Votes36

Azure DevOps

Stacks2.7K

Followers2.9K

Votes249

GitBucket vs Visual Studio Team Services: What are the differences?

# Key Differences between GitBucket and Visual Studio Team Services

GitBucket and Visual Studio Team Services (VSTS) are both popular platforms for managing code repositories and facilitating collaboration among developers. However, there are specific differences that set them apart from each other.

1. **Type of License**: GitBucket is an open-source and self-hosted platform, allowing users to install and customize the software on their own servers. On the other hand, VSTS is a cloud-based service provided by Microsoft, requiring users to subscribe to a paid plan for access to all features.
   
2. **Integration with Microsoft Tools**: VSTS seamlessly integrates with various Microsoft development tools such as Visual Studio IDE, Azure DevOps, and Azure Cloud services, providing a comprehensive ecosystem for development teams embedded in Microsoft technologies. GitBucket, being an open-source platform, may not have the same level of integration with Microsoft-specific tools.
   
3. **Scalability**: VSTS offers a high level of scalability and reliability due to its cloud-based infrastructure, enabling seamless collaboration and version control for large teams spread across different locations. GitBucket, being self-hosted, may require additional configurations and resources for scaling up to accommodate a growing number of users and projects.
   
4. **Customizability**: GitBucket allows users to customize the platform according to their specific requirements by adding plugins and extensions, providing flexibility in adapting the platform to suit different workflows and project structures. While VSTS offers a range of built-in features and integration options, the level of customization may be limited compared to GitBucket.
   
5. **Community Support**: GitBucket being an open-source project, has an active community of developers who contribute to its development, provide support, and create plugins to enhance its functionality. VSTS, being a proprietary platform, relies on official support channels provided by Microsoft, potentially leading to differences in the level and speed of community-driven support available for users.
   
6. **Cost Structure**: GitBucket is free to use and deploy, giving organizations full control over their budgets and resource allocations for managing code repositories. In contrast, VSTS offers a subscription-based model with tiered pricing plans based on the number of users and the features required, which may result in varying costs for organizations depending on their specific needs.

In Summary, GitBucket and Visual Studio Team Services differ in terms of licensing, integration with Microsoft tools, scalability, customizability, community support, and cost structure.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

GitBucket	Azure DevOps
GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.	Azure DevOps provides unlimited private Git hosting, cloud build for continuous integration, agile planning, and release management for continuous delivery to the cloud and on-premises. Includes broad IDE support.
Public / Private Git repository (http and ssh access);Repository viewer and online file editing;Repository search (Code and Issues);Wiki;Issues;Fork / Pull request;Mail notification;Activity timeline;User management (for Administrators);Group (like Organization in Github);LDAP integration;Gravatar support	Agile Tools: kanban boards, backlogs, scrum boards; Reporting: dashboards, widgets, Power BI; Git: free private repositories, pull requests; Continuous Integration: automated builds and diagnostics; Cloud build agents: cross-platform agents for Windows, Mac and Linux; Testing Tools: unit testing, load testing, manual, exploratory and user acceptance testing; Release Management: automate deployments, gated approval workflows, audit trails; Marketplace: extensions for the Visual Studio family of products; Package Management: host npm and NuGet packages; IDE Support: Eclipse, IntelliJ, Xcode and Visual Studio; Integration: link code and releases to work items, builds, and test results
Statistics
Stacks 79	Stacks 2.7K
Followers 177	Followers 2.9K
Votes 36	Votes 249
Pros & Cons
Pros 8 Self hosted 7 Open source 6 Familiar interface 5 Simple setup 5 Scala	Pros 56 Complete and powerful 32 Huge extension ecosystem 27 Azure integration 26 Flexible and powerful 26 One Stop Shop For Build server, Project Mgt, CDCI Cons 8 Still dependant on C# for agents 5 Half Baked 5 Many in devops disregard MS altogether 4 Not a requirements management tool 4 Jack of all trades, master of none
Integrations
No integrations available	GitHub Visual Studio Docker Slack Trello Git IntelliJ IDEA Jenkins Octopus Deploy Eclipse

What are some alternatives to GitBucket, Azure DevOps?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Trello

Trello is a collaboration tool that organizes your projects into boards. In one glance, Trello tells you what's being worked on, who's working on what, and where something is in a process.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Asana

Asana is the easiest way for teams to track their work. From tasks and projects to conversations and dashboards, Asana enables teams to move work from start to finish--and get results. Available at asana.com and on iOS & Android.

Basecamp

Basecamp is a project management and group collaboration tool. The tool includes features for schedules, tasks, files, and messages.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

Confluence

Capture the knowledge that's too often lost in email inboxes and shared network drives in Confluence instead – where it's easy to find, use, and update.

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Related Comparisons

GitBucket vs Visual Studio Team Services: What are the differences?

# Key Differences between GitBucket and Visual Studio Team Services

GitBucket and Visual Studio Team Services (VSTS) are both popular platforms for managing code repositories and facilitating collaboration among developers. However, there are specific differences that set them apart from each other.

1. **Type of License**: GitBucket is an open-source and self-hosted platform, allowing users to install and customize the software on their own servers. On the other hand, VSTS is a cloud-based service provided by Microsoft, requiring users to subscribe to a paid plan for access to all features.
   
2. **Integration with Microsoft Tools**: VSTS seamlessly integrates with various Microsoft development tools such as Visual Studio IDE, Azure DevOps, and Azure Cloud services, providing a comprehensive ecosystem for development teams embedded in Microsoft technologies. GitBucket, being an open-source platform, may not have the same level of integration with Microsoft-specific tools.
   
3. **Scalability**: VSTS offers a high level of scalability and reliability due to its cloud-based infrastructure, enabling seamless collaboration and version control for large teams spread across different locations. GitBucket, being self-hosted, may require additional configurations and resources for scaling up to accommodate a growing number of users and projects.
   
4. **Customizability**: GitBucket allows users to customize the platform according to their specific requirements by adding plugins and extensions, providing flexibility in adapting the platform to suit different workflows and project structures. While VSTS offers a range of built-in features and integration options, the level of customization may be limited compared to GitBucket.
   
5. **Community Support**: GitBucket being an open-source project, has an active community of developers who contribute to its development, provide support, and create plugins to enhance its functionality. VSTS, being a proprietary platform, relies on official support channels provided by Microsoft, potentially leading to differences in the level and speed of community-driven support available for users.
   
6. **Cost Structure**: GitBucket is free to use and deploy, giving organizations full control over their budgets and resource allocations for managing code repositories. In contrast, VSTS offers a subscription-based model with tiered pricing plans based on the number of users and the features required, which may result in varying costs for organizations depending on their specific needs.

In Summary, GitBucket and Visual Studio Team Services differ in terms of licensing, integration with Microsoft tools, scalability, customizability, community support, and cost structure.

GitBucket vs Visual Studio Team Services

Overview