Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Azure DevOps vs GitKraken: What are the differences?
Azure DevOps vs GitKraken
Azure DevOps and GitKraken are both tools used for managing software development projects, but they have some key differences. Here are 6 key differences between Azure DevOps and GitKraken:
Integration with other tools: Azure DevOps offers seamless integration with a wide range of Microsoft and third-party tools like Visual Studio, Azure, and Jenkins. GitKraken, on the other hand, focuses more on providing a comprehensive Git client and does not have as many integrations.
Built-in CI/CD capabilities: Azure DevOps provides built-in Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) capabilities, allowing developers to automate the build and release processes. GitKraken, however, does not have native CI/CD capabilities and requires integration with other tools for this functionality.
Project and task management: Azure DevOps offers robust project management features, including customizable Agile boards, backlogs, and dashboards. It also provides out-of-the-box support for Scrum, Kanban, and Agile methodologies. GitKraken, on the other hand, focuses primarily on version control and does not have comprehensive project management capabilities.
Enterprise-scale capabilities: Azure DevOps is designed to support enterprise-scale development projects with features like large-scale Git repositories, enterprise security and compliance, and support for multiple teams and projects. GitKraken, on the other hand, is more suited for smaller teams or individual developers.
Version control features: GitKraken provides a powerful Git client with an intuitive user interface and advanced version control features like Gitflow branching model, pull request management, and code review. Azure DevOps also provides version control features through Git repositories, but it offers additional features like centralized version control with Team Foundation Version Control (TFVC).
Reporting and analytics: Azure DevOps provides comprehensive reporting and analytics capabilities, allowing teams to track metrics, generate reports, and gain insights into their development processes. GitKraken, on the other hand, does not have native reporting and analytics features and requires integration with other tools for this functionality.
In summary, Azure DevOps provides a more comprehensive and integrated solution for managing software development projects, with features like extensive integrations, built-in CI/CD capabilities, project and task management, enterprise-scale capabilities, advanced version control features, and reporting and analytics. GitKraken, on the other hand, focuses primarily on providing a powerful Git client with advanced version control features and may be more suitable for smaller teams or individual developers who do not require the extensive project management and enterprise-scale capabilities offered by Azure DevOps.
Pros of Azure DevOps
- Complete and powerful56
- Huge extension ecosystem32
- Azure integration27
- Flexible and powerful26
- One Stop Shop For Build server, Project Mgt, CDCI26
- Everything I need. Simple and intuitive UI15
- Support Open Source13
- Integrations8
- GitHub Integration7
- Cost free for Stakeholders6
- One 4 all6
- Crap6
- Project Mgmt Features6
- Runs in the cloud5
- Agent On-Premise(Linux - Windows)3
- Aws integration2
- Link Test Cases to Stories2
- Jenkins Integration2
- GCP Integration1
Pros of GitKraken
- Dark theme60
- Best linux git client34
- Great overview29
- Full featured client21
- Gitflow support21
- Beautiful UI20
- Very easy to use19
- Graph17
- Works great on both linux and windows14
- Effortless14
- Easy Merge Conflict Tool6
- Great UX5
- Amazing Github and Bitbucket integration5
- Easy to Learn and Setup4
- Integration with GitHub4
- Super fast3
- Submodule support3
- Automatic Repo Discovery3
- Very user friendly2
- Fuzzy find (CTRL P)2
- Great for non-dev users1
- Because it has Linux client1
- Command palette (CTRL Shift P)1
- Much more stable than source tree1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Azure DevOps
- Still dependant on C# for agents8
- Half Baked5
- Many in devops disregard MS altogether5
- Not a requirements management tool4
- Jack of all trades, master of none4
- Capacity across cross functional teams not visibile4
- Poor Jenkins integration3
- Tedious for test plan/case creation2
- Switching accounts is impossible1
Cons of GitKraken
- Hangs occasionally (not as bad as sourcetree)4
- No edit/fixup in interactive rebase4
- Extremely slow when working with large repositories4
- Does not work like a Mac app3
- Do not allow to directly edit staging area3
- Not as many features as sourcetree3