GitKraken vs SourceTree vs Tower: What are the differences?
Introduction:
GitKraken, SourceTree, and Tower are all popular Git clients that provide user-friendly interfaces for working with Git repositories. While they have similar basic functionalities, there are key differences between them.
-
Integration with Version Control Platforms: GitKraken is not only compatible with Git, but also with GitHub, Bitbucket, and GitLab. It provides seamless integration with these version control platforms, allowing users to easily manage their repositories. In contrast, SourceTree primarily focuses on Git and Bitbucket, while Tower supports Git and Subversion.
-
User Interface: GitKraken boasts a sleek and intuitive user interface, with a graph-like visualization of the repository tree. This visual representation makes it easier to understand branches, merges, and commits. SourceTree also offers a user-friendly interface, but it lacks the same level of visual clarity. Tower, on the other hand, provides a powerful interface with a clean and organized layout, emphasizing efficiency and productivity.
-
Pricing Model: GitKraken follows a subscription-based pricing model, with different plans available for individuals, teams, and enterprises. It also offers a free version with limited features. SourceTree, on the other hand, is completely free to use for both personal and commercial purposes. Tower offers a one-time purchase license, with separate pricing for individuals and teams.
-
Platform Compatibility: GitKraken is available for Windows, macOS, and Linux, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of operating systems. SourceTree is primarily designed for macOS and Windows, with limited support for Linux. Tower, likewise, supports macOS and Windows, but it does not have native Linux support.
-
Advanced Features: GitKraken provides advanced features such as Git history, code review, pull request management, and built-in merge conflict resolution. SourceTree also offers pull request management and merge conflict resolution, but it does not include Git history or code review functionality. Tower, on the other hand, provides an extensive set of features including Git history, visual conflict resolution, and a powerful interactive rebase tool.
In summary, GitKraken offers seamless integration with popular version control platforms, a visually appealing interface, and advanced features. SourceTree is free to use, works well with Git and Bitbucket, and provides basic features. Tower emphasizes productivity and efficiency with a powerful interface and a comprehensive set of features.
Why do developers choose SourceTree vs GitKraken vs Tower?
- Fans of SourceTree love its visual history and branch view, citing its beautiful UI and easy repository browsing.
- GitKraken users love that it works with Linux and Windows as well as Mac, and call it a full featured client that’s very easy to use.
- Tower fans say it “just works.” They love its simple layout and GitHub integration.
What are some alternatives to SourceTree, GitKraken, and Tower?
- GitUp - The Git interface you've been missing all your life
- Fork - Fast and Friendly Git Client for Mac