Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Azure DevOps vs Google Cloud Code: What are the differences?
Developers describe Azure DevOps as "Services for teams to share code, track work, and ship software". Azure DevOps provides unlimited private Git hosting, cloud build for continuous integration, agile planning, and release management for continuous delivery to the cloud and on-premises. Includes broad IDE support. On the other hand, Google Cloud Code is detailed as "Everything you need to write, debug, and deploy your code". Tools to help you write, deploy, and debug cloud-native applications quickly and easily. Extensions to IDEs such as Visual Studio Code and IntelliJ are provided to let you rapidly iterate, debug, and deploy code to Kubernetes.
Azure DevOps and Google Cloud Code are primarily classified as "Project Management" and "Integrated Development Environment" tools respectively.
Some of the features offered by Azure DevOps are:
- Agile Tools: kanban boards, backlogs, scrum boards
- Reporting: dashboards, widgets, Power BI
- Git: free private repositories, pull requests
On the other hand, Google Cloud Code provides the following key features:
- Speed up Kubernetes development
- Simplify Kubernetes local deployment
- Easily extend to production deployment
Pros of Azure DevOps
- Complete and powerful56
- Huge extension ecosystem32
- Azure integration27
- One Stop Shop For Build server, Project Mgt, CDCI26
- Flexible and powerful25
- Everything I need. Simple and intuitive UI15
- Support Open Source13
- Integrations8
- GitHub Integration7
- Cost free for Stakeholders6
- Project Mgmt Features6
- One 4 all6
- Runs in the cloud5
- Crap5
- Agent On-Premise(Linux - Windows)3
- Aws integration2
- Jenkins Integration2
- Link Test Cases to Stories2
- GCP Integration1
Pros of Google Cloud Code
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Azure DevOps
- Still dependant on C# for agents8
- Many in devops disregard MS altogether5
- Capacity across cross functional teams not visibile4
- Not a requirements management tool4
- Half Baked4
- Jack of all trades, master of none3
- Poor Jenkins integration3
- Tedious for test plan/case creation2