Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Azure DevOps vs SourceTree: What are the differences?
Introduction
This markdown code provides a comparison between Azure DevOps and SourceTree, highlighting the key differences between the two.
Integration: Azure DevOps provides a comprehensive suite of integrated tools and services that cover the entire development lifecycle, including code repositories, build and release pipelines, testing tools, and project management. SourceTree, on the other hand, is a Git client that focuses primarily on providing a user-friendly interface for managing Git repositories.
Platform Compatibility: Azure DevOps is a cloud-based platform that can be accessed from any device with an internet connection, offering cross-platform compatibility. SourceTree is a desktop application available for Windows and macOS, limiting its compatibility to these operating systems.
Team Collaboration: Azure DevOps offers robust features for team collaboration, enabling multiple team members to work on the same project simultaneously, track progress, and share code seamlessly. SourceTree, being a Git client, lacks the extensive collaboration features provided by Azure DevOps.
Built-in CI/CD Pipelines: Azure DevOps includes built-in Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) pipelines, allowing developers to automatically build, test, and deploy their code changes. SourceTree, on the other hand, does not provide native CI/CD pipeline integration and relies on external tools for this functionality.
Project Management: Azure DevOps provides comprehensive project management features, including agile planning tools, Kanban boards, and customizable dashboards, allowing teams to effectively plan, track, and manage their projects. SourceTree, being a Git client, does not offer dedicated project management capabilities.
Scalability: Azure DevOps is designed to support enterprise-level scalability, allowing organizations to manage large-scale projects with multiple teams and repositories. SourceTree, as a desktop application, has limitations in terms of scalability, making it more suitable for individual or small-scale projects.
In summary, Azure DevOps is a comprehensive cloud-based platform that offers a wide range of integrated tools for software development, including project management, version control, and CI/CD pipelines. SourceTree, on the other hand, is a user-friendly Git client that provides a straightforward interface for managing Git repositories but lacks the extensive features and scalability of Azure DevOps.
I explored many Git Desktop tools for the Mac and my final decision was to use Fork. What I love about for that it contains three features, I like about a Git Client tool.
It allows * to handle day to day git operations (least important for me as I am cli junkie) * it helps to investigate the history * most important of all, it has a repo manager which many other tools are missing.
Pros of Azure DevOps
- Complete and powerful56
- Huge extension ecosystem32
- Azure integration27
- Flexible and powerful26
- One Stop Shop For Build server, Project Mgt, CDCI26
- Everything I need. Simple and intuitive UI15
- Support Open Source13
- Integrations8
- GitHub Integration7
- Cost free for Stakeholders6
- One 4 all6
- Crap6
- Project Mgmt Features6
- Runs in the cloud5
- Agent On-Premise(Linux - Windows)3
- Aws integration2
- Link Test Cases to Stories2
- Jenkins Integration2
- GCP Integration1
Pros of SourceTree
- Visual history and branch view205
- Beautiful UI164
- Easy repository browsing134
- Gitflow support87
- Interactive stage or discard by hunks or lines75
- Great branch visualization22
- Ui/ux and user-friendliness18
- Best Git Client UI/Features8
- Search commit messages7
- Available for Windows and macOS5
- Log only one file1
- Search file content1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Azure DevOps
- Still dependant on C# for agents8
- Half Baked5
- Many in devops disregard MS altogether5
- Not a requirements management tool4
- Jack of all trades, master of none4
- Capacity across cross functional teams not visibile4
- Poor Jenkins integration3
- Tedious for test plan/case creation2
- Switching accounts is impossible1
Cons of SourceTree
- Crashes often12
- So many bugs8
- Fetching is slow sometimes7
- No dark theme (Windows)5
- Extremely slow5
- Very unstable5
- Can't select text in diff (windows)4
- Freezes quite frequently3
- Can't scale window from top corners3
- UI blinking2
- Windows version worse than mac version2
- Installs to AppData folder (windows)2
- Diff makes tab indentation look like spaces2
- Windows and Mac versions are very different2
- Diff appears as if space indented even if its tabs2
- Doesn't have an option for git init2
- Useless for merge conflict resolution2
- Doesn't differentiate submodules from parent repos2
- Requires bitbucket account2
- Generally hard to like1
- No reflog support1
- Bases binary check on filesize1
- Can't add remotes by right clicking remotes (windows)1