Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Azure Monitor vs Zabbix: What are the differences?
Introduction:
In today's digital world, monitoring and managing the performance of IT infrastructure and applications is essential for businesses to ensure uninterrupted operations and optimal user experience. Two popular tools for monitoring IT environments are Azure Monitor and Zabbix. While both serve the same purpose, there are key differences between the two. Let's explore these differences in detail.
Architecture and Deployment: Azure Monitor is a cloud-based monitoring solution provided by Microsoft Azure, which means it is fully integrated with the Azure ecosystem. It collects data from various Azure services and resources, offering native integration and seamless deployment. On the other hand, Zabbix is an open-source monitoring software that is deployed on-premises or in a cloud environment. It provides a more flexible setup, enabling monitoring of both cloud and on-premises resources.
Monitoring Capabilities: Azure Monitor offers a comprehensive set of monitoring capabilities specifically designed for Azure services and resources. It provides built-in monitoring templates, predefined metrics, and automatic discovery of resources to simplify monitoring configuration. On the contrary, Zabbix is a general-purpose monitoring tool that can monitor various types of resources, including servers, networks, and applications. It offers extensive customizability and flexibility in monitoring configuration and supports a wide range of monitoring protocols.
Scalability and Performance: Azure Monitor is built on Microsoft's highly scalable and resilient Azure infrastructure. It automatically scales to handle large-scale monitoring needs and provides reliable performance even under heavy loads. Zabbix, being an open-source solution, can also scale up to a certain extent, but it may require additional infrastructure resources and fine-tuning to handle high loads efficiently.
Alerting and Notification: Azure Monitor provides advanced alerting and notification capabilities, including integration with Azure Logic Apps, Azure Functions, and other Azure services. It offers rich customization options for defining alert conditions and actions, enabling seamless integration with various notification channels such as email, SMS, and webhooks. Zabbix also provides alerting and notification features, but it requires manual configuration and setup of notification actions, which may take more effort compared to Azure Monitor.
Integration with Third-Party Tools: Azure Monitor offers native integration with other Azure services, enabling seamless integration with Azure Log Analytics, Azure Automation, and Azure Sentinel for advanced monitoring and management workflows. It also provides APIs and SDKs for integrating with external tools and systems. Zabbix, being an open-source solution, has a vast community of users and developers, resulting in a wide range of integrations with third-party tools and systems. It supports various protocols and interfaces for data collection and integration.
Cost and Licensing: Azure Monitor comes with a cost associated with Azure services and resources usage. The pricing model is based on the usage of monitoring data and other related services. Zabbix, being an open-source software, is free to download and use. However, it may require additional infrastructure resources and maintenance efforts, which should be considered while evaluating the overall cost of ownership.
In summary, Azure Monitor is a cloud-based monitoring solution tightly integrated with Azure services, offering specialized monitoring capabilities for Azure resources, while Zabbix is an open-source monitoring tool that provides flexibility in deployment and monitoring various types of resources. Azure Monitor leverages Azure's scalability and offers advanced alerting and notification features, while Zabbix has a wide range of integrations and is free to use.
My team is divided on using Centreon or Zabbix for enterprise monitoring and alert automation. Can someone let us know which one is better? There is one more tool called Datadog that we are using for cloud assets. Of course, Datadog presents us with huge bills. So we want to have a comparative study. Suggestions and advice are welcome. Thanks!
I work at Volvo Car Corporation as a consultant Project Manager. We have deployed Zabbix in all of our factories for factory monitoring because after thorough investigation we saw that Zabbix supports the wide variety of Operating Systems, hardware peripherals and devices a Car Manufacturer has.
No other tool had the same amount of support onboard for our production environment and we didn't want to end up using a different tool again for several areas. That is the major strong point about Zabbix and it's free of course. Another strong point is the documentation which is widely available; Zabbix Youtube channel with tutorial video's, Zabbix share which holds free templates, the Zabbix online documentation and the Zabbix forum also helped us out quite a bit. Deployment is quite easy since it uses templates, so almost all configuration can be done on server side.
To conclude, we are really pleased with the tool so far, it helped us detect several causes of issues that were a pain to solve in the past.
Centreon is part of the Nagios ecosystem, meaning there is a huge number of resources you may find around in the community (plugins, skills, addons). Zabbix monitoring paradigms are totally different from Centreon. Centreon plugins have some kind of intelligence when they are launched, where Zabbix monitoring rules are configured centrally with the raw data collected. Testing both will help you understand :) Users used to say Centreon may be faster for setup and deployment. And in the end, both are full of monitoring features. Centreon has out of the box a full catalog of probes from cloud to the edge https://www.centreon.com/en/plugins-pack-list/ As soon as you have defined your monitoring policies and template, you can deploy it fast through command line API or REST API. Centreon plays well in the ITSM, Automation, AIOps spaces with many connectors for Prometheus, ServiceNow, GLPI, Ansible, Chef, Splunk, ... The polling server mode is one of the differentiators with Centreon. You set up remote server(s) and chose btw multiple information-exchange mechanisms. Powerful and resilient for remote, VPN, DMZ, satellite networks. Centreon is a good value for price to do a data collection (availability, performance, fault) on a wide range of technologies (physical, legacy, cloud). There are pro support and enterprise version with dashboards and reporting. IT Central Station gathers many user feedback you can rely on both Centreon & Zabbix https://www.itcentralstation.com/products/centreon-reviews
We highly recommend Zabbix. We have used it to build our own monitoring product (available on cloud -like datadog- or on premise with support) because of its flexibility and extendability. It can be easily integrated with the powerful dashboarding and data aggregation of Grafana, so it is perfect. All configuration is done via web and templates, so it scales well and can be distributed via proxies. I think there also more companies providing consultancy in Zabbix (like ours) than Centreon and community is much wider. Also Zabbix roadmap and focus (compatibility with Elasticsearch, Prometheus, TimescaleDB) is really really good.
Hi Vivek, what's your stack? If huge monitoring bills are your concern and if you’re using a number of JVM languages, or mostly Scala / Akka, and would like “one tool to monitor them all”, Kamon might be the friendliest choice to go for.
Kamon APM’s major benefit is it comes with a built-in dashboard for the most important metrics to monitor, taking the pain of figuring out what to monitor and building your own dashboards for weeks out of the monitoring.
Pros of Azure Monitor
Pros of Zabbix
- Free21
- Alerts9
- Service/node/network discovery5
- Templates5
- Base metrics from the box4
- Multi-dashboards3
- SMS/Email/Messenger alerts3
- Grafana plugin available2
- Supports Graphs ans screens2
- Support proxies (for monitoring remote branches)2
- Perform website checking (response time, loading, ...)1
- API available for creating own apps1
- Templates free available (Zabbix Share)1
- Works with multiple databases1
- Advanced integrations1
- Supports multiple protocols/agents1
- Complete Logs Report1
- Open source1
- Supports large variety of Operating Systems1
- Supports JMX (Java, Tomcat, Jboss, ...)1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Azure Monitor
Cons of Zabbix
- The UI is in PHP5
- Puppet module is sluggish2