StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Monitoring
  4. Monitoring Tools
  5. Azure Monitor vs Zabbix

Azure Monitor vs Zabbix

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Zabbix
Zabbix
Stacks684
Followers981
Votes66
GitHub Stars5.3K
Forks1.1K
Azure Monitor
Azure Monitor
Stacks60
Followers184
Votes0

Azure Monitor vs Zabbix: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In today's digital world, monitoring and managing the performance of IT infrastructure and applications is essential for businesses to ensure uninterrupted operations and optimal user experience. Two popular tools for monitoring IT environments are Azure Monitor and Zabbix. While both serve the same purpose, there are key differences between the two. Let's explore these differences in detail.

  1. Architecture and Deployment: Azure Monitor is a cloud-based monitoring solution provided by Microsoft Azure, which means it is fully integrated with the Azure ecosystem. It collects data from various Azure services and resources, offering native integration and seamless deployment. On the other hand, Zabbix is an open-source monitoring software that is deployed on-premises or in a cloud environment. It provides a more flexible setup, enabling monitoring of both cloud and on-premises resources.

  2. Monitoring Capabilities: Azure Monitor offers a comprehensive set of monitoring capabilities specifically designed for Azure services and resources. It provides built-in monitoring templates, predefined metrics, and automatic discovery of resources to simplify monitoring configuration. On the contrary, Zabbix is a general-purpose monitoring tool that can monitor various types of resources, including servers, networks, and applications. It offers extensive customizability and flexibility in monitoring configuration and supports a wide range of monitoring protocols.

  3. Scalability and Performance: Azure Monitor is built on Microsoft's highly scalable and resilient Azure infrastructure. It automatically scales to handle large-scale monitoring needs and provides reliable performance even under heavy loads. Zabbix, being an open-source solution, can also scale up to a certain extent, but it may require additional infrastructure resources and fine-tuning to handle high loads efficiently.

  4. Alerting and Notification: Azure Monitor provides advanced alerting and notification capabilities, including integration with Azure Logic Apps, Azure Functions, and other Azure services. It offers rich customization options for defining alert conditions and actions, enabling seamless integration with various notification channels such as email, SMS, and webhooks. Zabbix also provides alerting and notification features, but it requires manual configuration and setup of notification actions, which may take more effort compared to Azure Monitor.

  5. Integration with Third-Party Tools: Azure Monitor offers native integration with other Azure services, enabling seamless integration with Azure Log Analytics, Azure Automation, and Azure Sentinel for advanced monitoring and management workflows. It also provides APIs and SDKs for integrating with external tools and systems. Zabbix, being an open-source solution, has a vast community of users and developers, resulting in a wide range of integrations with third-party tools and systems. It supports various protocols and interfaces for data collection and integration.

  6. Cost and Licensing: Azure Monitor comes with a cost associated with Azure services and resources usage. The pricing model is based on the usage of monitoring data and other related services. Zabbix, being an open-source software, is free to download and use. However, it may require additional infrastructure resources and maintenance efforts, which should be considered while evaluating the overall cost of ownership.

In summary, Azure Monitor is a cloud-based monitoring solution tightly integrated with Azure services, offering specialized monitoring capabilities for Azure resources, while Zabbix is an open-source monitoring tool that provides flexibility in deployment and monitoring various types of resources. Azure Monitor leverages Azure's scalability and offers advanced alerting and notification features, while Zabbix has a wide range of integrations and is free to use.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Zabbix, Azure Monitor

vivek
vivek

Jun 8, 2020

Needs adviceonCentreonCentreonZabbixZabbixDatadogDatadog

My team is divided on using Centreon or Zabbix for enterprise monitoring and alert automation. Can someone let us know which one is better? There is one more tool called Datadog that we are using for cloud assets. Of course, Datadog presents us with huge bills. So we want to have a comparative study. Suggestions and advice are welcome. Thanks!

795k views795k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Zabbix
Zabbix
Azure Monitor
Azure Monitor

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

It provides sophisticated tools for collecting and analyzing telemetry that allow you to maximize the performance and availability of your cloud and on-premises resources and applications.

Smart, Highly Automated Metric Collection; Advanced Problem Detection; Intelligent Alerting and Remediation
Store and analyze all your operational telemetry in a centralized, fully managed, scalable data store that’s optimized for performance and cost; Test your hypotheses and reveal hidden patterns using the advanced analytic engine, interactive query language, and built-in machine learning constructs; Integrate with popular DevOps, issue management, IT service management, and security information and event management tools
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.3K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
1.1K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
684
Stacks
60
Followers
981
Followers
184
Votes
66
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 21
    Free
  • 9
    Alerts
  • 5
    Service/node/network discovery
  • 5
    Templates
  • 4
    Base metrics from the box
Cons
  • 5
    The UI is in PHP
  • 2
    Puppet module is sluggish
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Slack
Slack
Jira
Jira
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
Grafana
Grafana
Ansible
Ansible
Skype
Skype
Chef
Chef
Bugzilla
Bugzilla
HipChat
HipChat
ServiceNow.com
ServiceNow.com
Jira
Jira
Azure DevOps
Azure DevOps
PagerDuty
PagerDuty
BindPlane
BindPlane

What are some alternatives to Zabbix, Azure Monitor?

Grafana

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Netdata

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Sensu

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).

Jaeger

Jaeger

Jaeger, a Distributed Tracing System

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana