Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Babel vs rollup: What are the differences?
Introduction
Babel and Rollup are popular tools used in web development to help with code compilation and bundling. While they have similar purposes, there are key differences between the two. This markdown code will present these differences in an organized manner.
Babel: Transpiles code for backward compatibility - Babel is primarily used for transpiling JavaScript code into backward-compatible versions, allowing developers to use modern syntax even if it's not supported by all browsers. It translates newer code features into equivalent older versions, ensuring compatibility across different environments and browsers.
Rollup: Focuses on module bundling - Rollup, on the other hand, is primarily focused on the task of module bundling. It takes multiple modules and combines them into a single file, reducing redundancy and improving performance. Rollup is often used for creating optimized bundles for production use.
Babel: Supports a wide range of plugins and presets - Babel offers a vast ecosystem of plugins and presets that developers can utilize to customize the transpiling process. Developers can choose specific plugins for targeted transformations, such as converting arrow functions or async/await syntax, allowing for fine-tuned control over the transpilation process.
Rollup: Tree-shaking for efficient code splitting - Rollup excels in tree-shaking, a process that eliminates unused code during bundling. This allows developers to create smaller bundle sizes by only including necessary code, resulting in faster loading times and reduced bandwidth usage.
Babel: Language agnostic - Babel is not limited to JavaScript and can be used for transpiling other languages that compile to JavaScript, such as TypeScript or JSX (used in React). This flexibility makes Babel a versatile tool for developers working with different languages and frameworks.
Rollup: Supports multiple output formats - Rollup has built-in support for generating bundles in various formats, including CommonJS, AMD, and ES modules, making it suitable for different project setups and environments. Developers can choose the desired output format easily based on their specific needs.
In Summary, Babel focuses on transpiling code for backward compatibility and offers a wide range of customization options, while Rollup specializes in module bundling with tree-shaking capabilities and support for multiple output formats.
We mostly use rollup to publish package onto NPM. For most all other use cases, we use the Meteor build tool (probably 99% of the time) for publishing packages. If you're using Node on FHIR you probably won't need to know rollup, unless you are somehow working on helping us publish front end user interface components using FHIR. That being said, we have been migrating away from Atmosphere package manager towards NPM. As we continue to migrate away, we may publish other NPM packages using rollup.
Pros of Babel
- Modern Javascript works with all browsers165
- Open source77
- Integration with lots of tools60
- Easy setup56
- Very active on github26
- JSX2
- Love2
- Source maps2
- Extensions1
Pros of rollup
- Makes it easy to publish packages4
- Easier configuration3
- Better tree shaking2
- Provides smaller bundle size2
- Integrates seamlessly with SystemJS1
- Produces very clean code1
- Very reliable1
- Very robust Plugin-API (years old Plugins still work)1
- Very flexible1
- Was built with ESM-Modules in mind1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Babel
Cons of rollup
- No clear path for static assets1
- No Loader like Webpack (need to use sjs or ESM imports)1
- Almost everything needs to be a Plugin1
- Manual Chunking is a bit buggy1