StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Beego vs Echo

Beego vs Echo

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Echo
Echo
Stacks346
Followers187
Votes59
GitHub Stars31.8K
Forks2.3K
Beego
Beego
Stacks52
Followers98
Votes0
GitHub Stars744
Forks183

Beego vs Echo: What are the differences?

Introduction

Beego and Echo are both popular web frameworks written in Go (Golang), used for building scalable and high-performance web applications. While they share some similarities, there are also key differences between the two frameworks that developers should consider when choosing which one to use.

  1. Routing Flexibility: Beego provides a comprehensive router that supports both static and dynamic routes. It offers a variety of routing methods and supports URL parameters and regular expressions. On the other hand, Echo focuses on simplicity and minimalism, offering a lightweight router that supports basic routing features without the complexity of advanced routing capabilities.

  2. Middleware Support: Beego has built-in support for middleware, allowing developers to easily add functionality to their applications. It provides a middleware engine that can handle different types of middleware such as logging, authentication, and session management. Echo, on the other hand, takes a more modular approach and relies on external middleware packages. This allows developers to choose only the middleware they need, resulting in a more lightweight and customizable application stack.

  3. Performance and Scalability: Beego is known for its performance and scalability, making it a solid choice for building large-scale web applications. It offers features like automatic parameter binding and validation, caching, and asynchronous processing. Echo, on the other hand, prioritizes simplicity and minimalism, resulting in a lighter and potentially faster framework that is well-suited for small to medium-sized projects.

  4. Community and Documentation: Beego has a large and active community with extensive documentation, making it easier for developers to find help and resources. It has been around for longer and has a wider adoption in the Go community. Echo, although relatively newer, also has a growing community and good documentation. However, it may not be as extensive or mature as Beego's community and documentation.

  5. Built-in Features: Beego comes with a rich set of built-in features such as built-in ORM, session management, form validation, and internationalization support. These features make it easier for developers to build complex web applications without relying on external packages. In contrast, Echo has a more minimalist approach and focuses on providing essential features out of the box, aiming for a leaner and more customizable framework.

  6. Ease of Learning: Beego is designed to be easy to learn and use, with a well-structured and intuitive codebase. It provides a comprehensive documentation and tutorials that guide developers through the process of building web applications. Echo, while also beginner-friendly, may have a steeper learning curve due to its minimalistic approach and less extensive documentation.

In Summary, Beego offers more advanced routing features, built-in middleware support, and a rich set of built-in features, making it a suitable choice for complex and scalable web applications. On the other hand, Echo focuses on simplicity, performance, and modularity, making it more suitable for smaller projects or developers who prefer a minimalist framework.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Echo
Echo
Beego
Beego

It is a high performance, extensible, minimalist web framework for Go (Golang).

It is a RESTful HTTP framework for the rapid development of Go applications including APIs, web apps and backend services with integrated Go specific features such as interfaces and struct embedding.

Optimized HTTP router which smartly prioritize routes; Build robust and scalable RESTful APIs; Run with standard HTTP server or FastHTTP server; Group APIs; Extensible middleware framework; Define middleware at root, group or route level; Data binding for JSON, XML and form payload; Handy functions to send variety of HTTP responses; Centralized HTTP error handling; Template rendering with any template engine; Define your format for the logger; Highly customizable
Interfaces; Struct embedding; Rapid Development
Statistics
GitHub Stars
31.8K
GitHub Stars
744
GitHub Forks
2.3K
GitHub Forks
183
Stacks
346
Stacks
52
Followers
187
Followers
98
Votes
59
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 11
    Easy to use
  • 10
    Performance
  • 10
    Highly customizable
  • 9
    Lightweight
  • 9
    Open source
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Golang
Golang
Golang
Golang
Sentry
Sentry
Laravel
Laravel
Stream
Stream
Python
Python
Apache HTTP Server
Apache HTTP Server
KeyCDN
KeyCDN

What are some alternatives to Echo, Beego?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase