Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Beta by Crashlytics
Beta by Crashlytics

65
40
+ 1
26
GitLab
GitLab

11K
8.6K
+ 1
2.1K
Add tool

Beta by Crashlytics vs GitLab: What are the differences?

Beta by Crashlytics: Free, streamlined beta distribution for iOS/Android. A streamlined solution for distributing apps that gives you a single, cross-platform toolset for iOS and Android, and a delightful, effortless onboarding for your testers; GitLab: Open source self-hosted Git management software. GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Beta by Crashlytics and GitLab are primarily classified as "Beta Testing / Mobile App Distribution" and "Code Collaboration & Version Control" tools respectively.

Some of the features offered by Beta by Crashlytics are:

  • Dashboard that delivers detailed build, tester and developer information
  • See the activity of both your developers and your testers. All in one screen.
  • Integrated with Crashlytics- Get performance insight, starting with beta testing, all the way through App or Play store distribution.

On the other hand, GitLab provides the following key features:

  • Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure
  • Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests
  • Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki

"Dirt-simple integration" is the top reason why over 7 developers like Beta by Crashlytics, while over 451 developers mention "Self hosted" as the leading cause for choosing GitLab.

GitLab is an open source tool with 20.1K GitHub stars and 5.33K GitHub forks. Here's a link to GitLab's open source repository on GitHub.

According to the StackShare community, GitLab has a broader approval, being mentioned in 1219 company stacks & 1431 developers stacks; compared to Beta by Crashlytics, which is listed in 19 company stacks and 9 developer stacks.

- No public GitHub repository available -

What is Beta by Crashlytics?

A streamlined solution for distributing apps that gives you a single, cross-platform toolset for iOS and Android, and a delightful, effortless onboarding for your testers.

What is GitLab?

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Beta by Crashlytics?
Why do developers choose GitLab?

Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

    Be the first to leave a con
    Jobs that mention Beta by Crashlytics and GitLab as a desired skillset
    What companies use Beta by Crashlytics?
    What companies use GitLab?

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Beta by Crashlytics?
    What tools integrate with GitLab?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Beta by Crashlytics and GitLab?
    TestFlight
    With TestFlight, developers simply upload a build, and the testers can install it directly from their device, over the air.
    Fabric by Twitter
    Installing and managing a wide range of SDKs can be cumbersome and complex. Fabric solves this problem by combining all seven of our SDKs under one roof and organizing them into three Kits: the Crashlytics Kit, the Twitter Kit, and the MoPub Kit.
    HockeyApp
    HockeyApp is the best way to collect live crash reports, get feedback from your users, distribute your betas, and analyze your test coverage.
    TestFairy
    When testing apps in the crowd, you never know what exactly was done, and what went wrong on the client side. TestFairy shows you a video of the exact test that was done, including CPU, memory, GPS, network and a lot more.
    BoardingBot
    BoardingBot will create a site for your app and allow users to opt-in to beta testing, and receive a TestFlight invitation automatically.
    See all alternatives
    Decisions about Beta by Crashlytics and GitLab
    Michael Kelly
    Michael Kelly
    Senior Software Engineer at StackShare · | 14 upvotes · 192.7K views
    atACK FoundryACK Foundry
    GitLab
    GitLab
    GitHub
    GitHub
    GitLab CI
    GitLab CI
    GitLab Pages
    GitLab Pages
    Bitbucket
    Bitbucket
    #OpenSourceCloud

    I use GitLab when building side-projects and MVPs. The interface and interactions are close enough to those of GitHub to prevent cognitive switching costs between professional and personal projects hosted on different services.

    GitLab also provides a suite of tools including issue/project management, CI/CD with GitLab CI, and validation/landing pages with GitLab Pages. With everything in one place, on an #OpenSourceCloud GitLab makes it easy for me to manage much larger projects on my own, than would be possible with other solutions or tools.

    It's petty I know, but I can also read the GitLab code diffs far more easily than diffs on GitHub or Bitbucket...they just look better in my opinion.

    See more
    Tim Abbott
    Tim Abbott
    Founder at Zulip · | 18 upvotes · 157.6K views
    atZulipZulip
    GitHub
    GitHub
    GitLab
    GitLab

    I have mixed feelings on GitHub as a product and our use of it for the Zulip open source project. On the one hand, I do feel that being on GitHub helps people discover Zulip, because we have enough stars (etc.) that we rank highly among projects on the platform. and there is a definite benefit for lowering barriers to contribution (which is important to us) that GitHub has such a dominant position in terms of what everyone has accounts with.

    But even ignoring how one might feel about their new corporate owner (MicroSoft), in a lot of ways GitHub is a bad product for open source projects. Years after the "Dear GitHub" letter, there are still basic gaps in its issue tracker:

    • You can't give someone permission to label/categorize issues without full write access to a project (including ability to merge things to master, post releases, etc.).
    • You can't let anyone with a GitHub account self-assign issues to themselves.
    • Many more similar issues.

    It's embarrassing, because I've talked to GitHub product managers at various open source events about these things for 3 years, and they always agree the thing is important, but then nothing ever improves in the Issues product. Maybe the new management at MicroSoft will fix their product management situation, but if not, I imagine we'll eventually do the migration to GitLab.

    We have a custom bot project, http://github.com/zulip/zulipbot, to deal with some of these issues where possible, and every other large project we talk to does the same thing, more or less.

    See more
    Bitbucket
    Bitbucket
    GitLab
    GitLab
    GitHub
    GitHub

    Bitbucket provides 5 private repositories for free that is I believe the best feature. GitLab seems very simmilar to GitHub. The only reason I've choosen GitHub is its popularity. It seems faster than GitLab, uglier than Bitbucket and featured as others. The best open source projects are hosted on GitHub. Many applications are integrated with GitHub like my favourite #GitKraken.

    See more
    Jaime Leonardo Suncin Cruz
    Jaime Leonardo Suncin Cruz
    GitHub
    GitHub
    GitLab
    GitLab

    Keep with GitHub if you feel comfortable, If you want to switch to other keep in mind the change of mindset and you will need time to adapt, i'm not saying that GitLab is bad or difficult just the opposite, but it can be overwhelming because it have more integrated features (I love this) than GitHub , what it means more configs available that you can mess up.

    See more
    Jona Koudijs
    Jona Koudijs
    Infrastructure Engineer at True · | 5 upvotes · 3.6K views
    GitLab
    GitLab

    I use GitLab because of the tight integration with Gitlab CI. I noticed that having the entire build chain integrated into one platform, makes it easier for developers and infrastructure engineers to work with automated testing and deploying even though not everybody has the same amount of experience with it.

    See more
    Logan Campos
    Logan Campos
    Computer Programmer at cryptosec.dev · | 10 upvotes · 44.3K views
    GitLab
    GitLab
    GitHub
    GitHub

    As an former administrator for GitLab enterprise I can say for closed source development it is an amazing tool to have. It does however have limits. For starters you will need to bother your unix administrators to assign a license to you. And after that happens the same guys start getting cranky if you use git LFS(Large File Storage) or manage a couple repos about ~100MBish. if you fork open source efforts remember to git clone --depth 1 ! As a free user of GitHub , I don't get crazy CI pipelines or crazy project management tools. I also don't need it !

    See more
    Russtopia Labs
    Russtopia Labs
    Sr. Doodad Imagineer at Russtopia Labs · | 3 upvotes · 30.7K views
    Gogs
    Gogs
    GitHub
    GitHub
    Go
    Go
    GitLab
    GitLab

    I installed Gogs after a few repos I planned to use on GitHub disappeared without explanation, and after Microsoft's acquisition of same, it made me think about the over-centralization of community-developed software. A self-hosted solution that enables easy point-and-click mirroring of important repositories for my projects, both in-house and 3rd-party, ensures I won't be bitten by upstream catastrophes. (So far, Microsoft's stewardship has been fine, but always be prepared). It's also a very nice way to host one's own private repos before they're ready for prime-time on github.

    Gogs is written in Go and is easy to install and configure, much more so than GitLab. The only major feature I wish it had is an integrated code review tool.

    See more
    Daniel Quinn
    Daniel Quinn
    Senior Developer at Workfinder · | 6 upvotes · 7.4K views
    atThe Paperless ProjectThe Paperless Project
    GitHub
    GitHub
    GitLab
    GitLab

    We use GitHub because it's the default go-to place for the Free software community. Currently, Github is enjoying the network effect: you write code there because everyone writes there code there, so this choice was less of a choice than "what we all end up doing".

    Personally, I prefer GitLab for its bundled-in tools like CI, boards, packaging, and Docker repo, but so long as the vast majority of talented nerds out there are on Github, that's where Paperless will be.

    See more
    GitHub
    GitHub
    Bitbucket
    Bitbucket
    GitLab
    GitLab

    I use GitHub because it's the coolest kid on the block for open source. Searching for repos you need/want is easy.

    Especially with the apache foundation moving their workloads to them, unlimited private repos, and a package registry on the way, they are becoming the one stop shop for open source needs.

    I'm curious to see how the GitHub Sponsors(patreon for developers) plays out, and what it'll do for open source. Hopefully, they design it in a way where it's not abused by big tech to "plant" developers that look like they're building open source when they're actually building proprietary tools.

    Bitbucket GitLab

    See more
    Tom Klein
    Tom Klein
    CEO at Gentlent · | 9 upvotes · 44K views
    atGentlentGentlent
    Git
    Git
    GitHub
    GitHub
    GitLab
    GitLab
    Docker
    Docker
    Kubernetes
    Kubernetes
    HAProxy
    HAProxy
    Varnish
    Varnish
    npm
    npm
    Visual Studio Code
    Visual Studio Code

    We're using Git through GitHub for public repositories and GitLab for our private repositories due to its easy to use features. Docker and Kubernetes are a must have for our highly scalable infrastructure complimented by HAProxy with Varnish in front of it. We are using a lot of npm and Visual Studio Code in our development sessions.

    See more
    GitHub
    GitHub
    GitLab
    GitLab
    Bitbucket
    Bitbucket
    #Githubmarketplace

    A bit difference in GitHub and GitLab though both are Version Control repository management services which provides key component in the software development workflow. A decision of choosing GitHub over GitLab is major leap extension from code management, to deployment and monitoring alongside looking beyond the code base hosting provided best fitted tools for developer communities.

    • Authentication stages - With GitLab you can set and modify people’s permissions according to their role. In GitHub, you can decide if someone gets a read or write access to a repository.
    • Built-In Continuous Integrations - GitLab offers its very own CI for free. No need to use an external CI service. And if you are already used to an external CI, you can obviously integrate with Jenkins, etc whereas GitHub offers various 3rd party integrations – such as Travis CI, CircleCI or Codeship – for running and testing your code. However, there’s no built-in CI solution at the moment.
    • Import/Export Resources - GitLab offers detailed documentation on how to import your data from other vendors – such as GitHub, Bitbucket to GitLab. GitHub, on the other hand, does not offer such detailed documentation for the most common git repositories. However, GitHub offers to use GitHub Importer if you have your source code in Subversion, Mercurial, TFS and others.

    Also when it comes to exporting data, GitLab seems to do a pretty solid job, offering you the ability to export your projects including the following data:

    • Wiki and project repositories
    • Project uploads
    • The configuration including webhooks and services
    • Issues with comments, merge requests with diffs and comments, labels, milestones, snippets, and other project entities.

    GitHub, on the other hand, seems to be more restrictive when it comes to export features of existing GitHub repositories. * Integrations - #githubmarketplace gives you an essence to have multiple and competitive integrations whereas you will find less in the GitLab.

    So go ahead with better understanding.

    See more
    Tassanai Singprom
    Tassanai Singprom
    JavaScript
    JavaScript
    PHP
    PHP
    HTML5
    HTML5
    jQuery
    jQuery
    Redis
    Redis
    Amazon EC2
    Amazon EC2
    Ubuntu
    Ubuntu
    Sass
    Sass
    Vue.js
    Vue.js
    Firebase
    Firebase
    Laravel
    Laravel
    Lumen
    Lumen
    Amazon RDS
    Amazon RDS
    GraphQL
    GraphQL
    MariaDB
    MariaDB
    Google Analytics
    Google Analytics
    Postman
    Postman
    Elasticsearch
    Elasticsearch
    Git
    Git
    GitHub
    GitHub
    GitLab
    GitLab
    npm
    npm
    Visual Studio Code
    Visual Studio Code
    Kibana
    Kibana
    Sentry
    Sentry
    BrowserStack
    BrowserStack
    Slack
    Slack

    This is my stack in Application & Data

    JavaScript PHP HTML5 jQuery Redis Amazon EC2 Ubuntu Sass Vue.js Firebase Laravel Lumen Amazon RDS GraphQL MariaDB

    My Utilities Tools

    Google Analytics Postman Elasticsearch

    My Devops Tools

    Git GitHub GitLab npm Visual Studio Code Kibana Sentry BrowserStack

    My Business Tools

    Slack

    See more
    Interest over time
    Reviews of Beta by Crashlytics and GitLab
    Review ofBeta by CrashlyticsBeta by Crashlytics

    We have used this product on several high-profile iOS and Android applications, after using TestFlight for a couple of years; when TestFlight was acquired, Android support was deprecated. Managing two alpha/beta distribution solutions is cumbersome -- the Google Play service is prone to accidental mistakes in terms of release by inexperienced clients, and the TestFlight process is less streamlined for iOS distribution than the latest using Fabric (Crashlytics, Beta, Answer stack). It is simple, free, and platform agnostic -- what more could you hope for?

    Avatar of veggiemonk
    JavaScript Developer
    Review ofGitLabGitLab

    You cannot get easier setup and deployment with GitLab. The documentation is huge and many common use cases are covered. It has a Community Edition (CE, free, 100% open source) and an Enterprise Edittion (EE, see pricing). The CE is more than good enough. Although in the entreprise world, the EE is much better suited if, for instance, LDAP is needed. There is a Web UI that allows people to version their work without too much hassle. If you are a developer and have worked with git before this is really easy.

    How developers use Beta by Crashlytics and GitLab
    Avatar of Eldoria
    Eldoria uses GitLabGitLab

    Als einer der größten Konkurrenten zu GitHub und BitBucket, stellt GitLab eine verlässliche Alternative dar. Als private GitLab Instanz oder als Service bietet GitLab alle Features die wir benötigen und das völlig Kostenfrei in der Community Edition. Hier liegen alle unsere Repositories.

    Avatar of Scrayos UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
    Scrayos UG (haftungsbeschränkt) uses GitLabGitLab

    Gitlab offers us a self-hosted replacement for Github and even more than we were expecting from it. All of our code is hosted in our private GitLab-instance, that also hosts our artifacts and is used to deploy them into production.