StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Bitbucket Pipelines vs Blue Ocean

Bitbucket Pipelines vs Blue Ocean

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Blue Ocean
Blue Ocean
Stacks92
Followers167
Votes7
GitHub Stars2.9K
Forks537
Bitbucket Pipelines
Bitbucket Pipelines
Stacks350
Followers368
Votes0

Bitbucket Pipelines vs Blue Ocean: What are the differences?

Introduction: In this Markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between Bitbucket Pipelines and Blue Ocean. Both Bitbucket Pipelines and Blue Ocean are tools used for continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) in software development.

  1. Integration with Version Control System (VCS): Bitbucket Pipelines is directly integrated with the Bitbucket version control system, allowing for seamless CI/CD within the same platform. On the other hand, Blue Ocean is a plugin for Jenkins, which requires integration with a separate VCS, such as Bitbucket, GitHub, or GitLab.

  2. User Interface (UI) and Visualization: Blue Ocean provides a more visually appealing and intuitive user interface, with a modern look and feel. It offers a visual pipeline editor, real-time view of pipeline status, and detailed visualization of build and deployment stages. Bitbucket Pipelines, although functional, has a simpler and less visually appealing user interface.

  3. Customization and Flexibility: Bitbucket Pipelines allows for more customization and flexibility in defining CI/CD workflows. It supports the use of different programming languages, frameworks, and build tools. Blue Ocean, being a plugin for Jenkins, provides a vast range of plugins for customization, but it may require more configuration and setup.

  4. Ease of Use and Learning Curve: Blue Ocean aims to provide a simpler and more user-friendly experience for users, with its intuitive UI and guided setup process. Bitbucket Pipelines, while not as visually pleasing, has a relatively easy learning curve for developers familiar with Bitbucket.

  5. Pricing and Licensing: Bitbucket Pipelines provides CI/CD capabilities as a built-in feature of Bitbucket and is free for small teams. However, it may come with some limitations based on the Bitbucket plan. Blue Ocean, being a plugin for Jenkins, is also free and open-source, but it requires additional infrastructure and resources to set up and maintain.

  6. Community and Support: Bitbucket Pipelines has a dedicated support team and a large community of users, offering resources and assistance for troubleshooting and technical queries. Blue Ocean, being a plugin for Jenkins, benefits from the wide-reaching Jenkins community, which provides extensive documentation, plugins, and community support.

In Summary, Bitbucket Pipelines offers seamless integration with Bitbucket VCS, while Blue Ocean is a plugin for Jenkins that requires integration with various VCS. Blue Ocean provides a visually appealing UI and visualization capabilities, while Bitbucket Pipelines offers more flexibility and customization options. Blue Ocean aims to provide a simpler user experience, while Bitbucket Pipelines has a simpler learning curve for Bitbucket users. Both are free but have different pricing models, and they have dedicated support and communities to assist users.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Blue Ocean
Blue Ocean
Bitbucket Pipelines
Bitbucket Pipelines

Designed from the ground up for Jenkins Pipeline and compatible with Freestyle jobs, Blue Ocean reduces clutter and increases clarity for every member of your team.

It is an Integrated continuous integration and continuous deployment for Bitbucket Cloud that's trivial to set up, automating your code from test to production. Our mission is to enable all teams to ship software faster by driving the practice of continuous delivery.

Sophisticated visualizations of CD pipelines, allowing for fast and intuitive comprehension of software pipeline status.;Pipeline editor (In Development) that makes automating CD pipelines approachable by guiding the user through an intuitive and visual process to create a pipeline.;Personalization of the Jenkins UI to suit the role-based needs of each member of the DevOps team.;Pinpoint precision when intervention is needed and/or issues arise. The Blue Ocean UI shows where in the pipeline attention is needed, facilitating exception handling and increasing productivity.;Native integration for branch and pull requests enables maximum developer productivity when collaborating on code with others in GitHub and Bitbucket.
Continuous integration and delivery; Map the branch structure; Run as service; Extend your workflow; Go multilingual with Docker; Use environment Variables; Skip the queue;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
2.9K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
537
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
92
Stacks
350
Followers
167
Followers
368
Votes
7
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 7
    Beautiful interface
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Jenkins
Jenkins
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Blue Ocean, Bitbucket Pipelines?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana