StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Bitbucket Pipelines vs Jenkins X

Bitbucket Pipelines vs Jenkins X

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Bitbucket Pipelines
Bitbucket Pipelines
Stacks350
Followers368
Votes0
Jenkins X
Jenkins X
Stacks147
Followers370
Votes16
GitHub Stars4.7K
Forks800

Bitbucket Pipelines vs Jenkins X: What are the differences?

  1. Deployment Approach: Bitbucket Pipelines is primarily based on a declarative YAML file that specifies the steps to be executed in the CI/CD pipeline, whereas Jenkins X utilizes GitOps principles to automatically deploy changes to production using Kubernetes and Helm charts.
  2. Development Platform: Jenkins X is more focused on providing a comprehensive development platform for Kubernetes-native applications with features like automated CI/CD, Git repository management, and preview environments, whereas Bitbucket Pipelines focuses primarily on CI/CD pipelines for Bitbucket repositories.
  3. Tool Ecosystem: Bitbucket Pipelines has a smaller ecosystem of plugins and integrations compared to Jenkins X, which has a wide range of plugins and tools that can be used to extend its functionality and integrate with various other tools in the DevOps pipeline.
  4. Ease of Use: Bitbucket Pipelines is known for its simplicity and ease of use, with a user-friendly interface for creating and managing pipelines, while Jenkins X has a steeper learning curve due to its more complex feature set and advanced customization options.
  5. Community Support: Jenkins X benefits from a larger community of users and contributors, leading to more active development, support, and a wealth of resources available online, whereas Bitbucket Pipelines may have more limited resources and community support in comparison.
  6. Kubernetes Integration: Jenkins X is tightly integrated with Kubernetes by default, making it easier to deploy and manage applications on Kubernetes clusters, while Bitbucket Pipelines may require more setup and configuration to work seamlessly with Kubernetes environments.

In Summary, the key differences between Bitbucket Pipelines and Jenkins X lie in their deployment approach, development platform focus, tool ecosystem, ease of use, community support, and Kubernetes integration.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Bitbucket Pipelines, Jenkins X

Stratos
Stratos

Jan 13, 2020

Needs advice

We are a mid-size startup running Scala apps. Moving from Jenkins/EC2 to Spinnaker/EKS and looking for a tool to cover our CI/CD needs. Our code lives on GitHub, artifacts in nexus, images in ECR.

Drone is out, GitHub actions are being considered along with Circle CI and GitLab CI.

We primarily need:

  • Fast SBT builds (caching)
  • Low maintenance overhead (ideally serverless)
  • Everything as code
  • Ease of use
181k views181k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bitbucket Pipelines
Bitbucket Pipelines
Jenkins X
Jenkins X

It is an Integrated continuous integration and continuous deployment for Bitbucket Cloud that's trivial to set up, automating your code from test to production. Our mission is to enable all teams to ship software faster by driving the practice of continuous delivery.

Jenkins X is a CI/CD solution for modern cloud applications on Kubernetes

Continuous integration and delivery; Map the branch structure; Run as service; Extend your workflow; Go multilingual with Docker; Use environment Variables; Skip the queue;
Automated CI and CD - Rather than having to have deep knowledge of the internals of Jenkins Pipeline, Jenkins X will default awesome pipelines for your projects that implements fully CI and CD; Environment Promotion via GitOps - Each team gets a set of Environments. Jenkins X then automates the management of the Environments and the Promotion of new versions of Applications between Environments via GitOps; Pull Request Preview Environments - Jenkins X automatically spins up Preview Environments for your Pull Requests so you can get fast feedback before changes are merged to master; Feedback on Issues and Pull Requests - Jenkins X automatically comments on your Commits, Issues and Pull Requests with feedback as code is ready to be previewed, is promoted to environments or if Pull Requests are generated automatically to upgrade versions
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
4.7K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
800
Stacks
350
Stacks
147
Followers
368
Followers
370
Votes
0
Votes
16
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 7
    Kubernetes integration
  • 5
    Scripted Pipelines
  • 4
    GitOps
Cons
  • 1
    Complexity
Integrations
No integrations available
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
macOS
macOS
Linux Mint
Linux Mint
Ubuntu
Ubuntu
Debian
Debian
Fedora
Fedora

What are some alternatives to Bitbucket Pipelines, Jenkins X?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana