Bitbucket vs Codealike

Overview

Bitbucket

Stacks41.1K

Followers33.4K

Votes2.8K

Codealike

Stacks13

Followers27

Votes16

Bitbucket vs Codealike: What are the differences?

Introduction

In the realm of software development, tools like Bitbucket and Codealike both offer unique features and capabilities to assist developers in their coding endeavors. Here, we will explore the key differences between Bitbucket and Codealike.

Version Control System: Bitbucket, developed by Atlassian, is a web-based version control repository hosting service that supports both Git and Mercurial. Codealike, on the other hand, is a productivity tracking tool that provides insights on how developers work and collaborate on code repositories.
Collaboration Features: Bitbucket offers robust collaboration features such as pull requests, code reviews, and branch permissions for teams to work together seamlessly on projects. In contrast, Codealike primarily focuses on individual productivity tracking and does not provide collaborative functionalities for teams.
Integration Capabilities: Bitbucket integrates smoothly with a wide range of development tools and services such as JIRA, Trello, and Slack, enhancing the overall workflow for developers. However, Codealike does not offer as extensive integration options, limiting its compatibility with other development tools.
Code Insights: Bitbucket provides detailed code insights and analytics for repositories, allowing developers to track code changes, performance metrics, and productivity over time. In comparison, Codealike focuses on providing individual developers with actionable insights on their coding habits and productivity levels.
Cost Structure: While Bitbucket offers both free and paid plans with varying features and storage limits, Codealike follows a subscription-based model with pricing based on the number of users and tracking features required. This difference in cost structure can influence the choice of tool based on budget constraints and organizational needs.
Focus on Developer Productivity: Codealike distinguishes itself by placing a strong emphasis on developer productivity tracking, providing insights into focus time, interruptions, and coding patterns to help individuals enhance their efficiency and effectiveness in coding tasks.

In Summary, Bitbucket and Codealike differ in their core functionalities, collaboration features, integration capabilities, code insights, cost structure, and focus on developer productivity.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Bitbucket, Codealike

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 22, 2020

Review

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

1.1M views1.1M

Comments

Elmar

CEO, Managing Director at Wouters Media

Nov 9, 2020

Decided

I first used BitBucket because it had private repo's, and it didn't disappoint me. Also with the smooth integration of Jira, the decision to use BitBucket as a full application maintenance service was as easy as 1, 2, 3.

I honestly love BitBucket, by the looks, by the UI, and the smooth integration with Tower.

586k views586k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bitbucket	Codealike
Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.	Codealike is a service that tracks your activity while you code normally. Once you've installed and signed in in your preferred IDE (Visual Studio, Eclipse or Chrome), the plugin will track, process and send the data to our servers so you can visualize it anytime you want to learn how you work and how to improve through trustworthy data.
Unlimited private repositories, charged per user;Best-in-class Jira integration;Built-in CI/CD;Deployment visibility;Embedded Trello boards; Command Instructions;Source Browser;Git Powered Wikis;Integrated Issue Tracking;Code reviews with inline comments;Compare View;Newsfeed;Followers;Developer Profiles;Autocompletion for @username mentions;Support for Mercurial	Personal Dashboard;Behavior report;Web Navigation;Code Tree;Code report;Timeline;Teams Dashboard
Statistics
Stacks 41.1K	Stacks 13
Followers 33.4K	Followers 27
Votes 2.8K	Votes 16
Pros & Cons
Pros 905 Free private repos 397 Simple setup 349 Nice ui and tools 342 Unlimited private repositories 240 Affordable git hosting Cons 19 Not much community activity 17 Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui 15 Quite buggy 10 Managed by enterprise Java company 8 CI tool is not free of charge	Pros 5 It challenges me to keep on focus 5 With those metrics I can improve my coding and focus 3 Measure productivity 2 Eclipse integration 1 Track Web Activities Cons 1 Discontinued
Integrations
Git AWS Cloud9 Sentry Microsoft Azure npm Trello Slack Confluence Docker Jira	Visual Studio Eclipse

What are some alternatives to Bitbucket, Codealike?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

WakaTime

Quantify your coding - open source plugins for automatic time tracking & insights into your programming.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs Codealike: What are the differences?

Introduction

Version Control System: Bitbucket, developed by Atlassian, is a web-based version control repository hosting service that supports both Git and Mercurial. Codealike, on the other hand, is a productivity tracking tool that provides insights on how developers work and collaborate on code repositories.
Collaboration Features: Bitbucket offers robust collaboration features such as pull requests, code reviews, and branch permissions for teams to work together seamlessly on projects. In contrast, Codealike primarily focuses on individual productivity tracking and does not provide collaborative functionalities for teams.
Integration Capabilities: Bitbucket integrates smoothly with a wide range of development tools and services such as JIRA, Trello, and Slack, enhancing the overall workflow for developers. However, Codealike does not offer as extensive integration options, limiting its compatibility with other development tools.
Code Insights: Bitbucket provides detailed code insights and analytics for repositories, allowing developers to track code changes, performance metrics, and productivity over time. In comparison, Codealike focuses on providing individual developers with actionable insights on their coding habits and productivity levels.
Cost Structure: While Bitbucket offers both free and paid plans with varying features and storage limits, Codealike follows a subscription-based model with pricing based on the number of users and tracking features required. This difference in cost structure can influence the choice of tool based on budget constraints and organizational needs.
Focus on Developer Productivity: Codealike distinguishes itself by placing a strong emphasis on developer productivity tracking, providing insights into focus time, interruptions, and coding patterns to help individuals enhance their efficiency and effectiveness in coding tasks.

In Summary, Bitbucket and Codealike differ in their core functionalities, collaboration features, integration capabilities, code insights, cost structure, and focus on developer productivity.

Bitbucket vs Codealike

Overview

Bitbucket vs Codealike: What are the differences?