Bitbucket vs Gogs

Overview

Bitbucket

Stacks41.1K

Followers33.4K

Votes2.8K

Gogs

Stacks175

Followers306

Votes182

Bitbucket vs Gogs: What are the differences?

Introduction

Bitbucket and Gogs are both popular version control systems used by software development teams to manage their code repositories. While they have similarities in function, there are several key differences between the two platforms that set them apart. In this markdown, we will highlight six key differences between Bitbucket and Gogs.

User Interface and Design: Bitbucket offers a more modern and visually appealing user interface compared to Gogs. It provides a more user-friendly experience with its intuitive design, making it easier for users to navigate and perform actions.
Pricing and Licensing: Bitbucket offers both free and paid plans, allowing users with different needs to choose the right pricing option. Gogs, on the other hand, is an open-source platform that is completely free to use, making it a suitable choice for users looking for a cost-effective solution.
Collaboration Features: Bitbucket provides a range of collaboration features such as pull requests, inline commenting, and code review tools. These features make it easier for teams to collaborate and review code changes. Gogs, however, has limited collaboration features, making it more suitable for smaller teams or individual developers.
Integration Options: Bitbucket offers a wide range of integrations with other popular development tools such as Jira, Trello, and Slack. This enables seamless workflows and enhances productivity for development teams. Gogs, on the other hand, has fewer integration options, which may limit its capabilities when it comes to integrating with other tools.
Scalability and Performance: Bitbucket is known for its scalability and high performance, making it suitable for larger teams or projects with heavy code repositories. Gogs, although capable of handling smaller projects effectively, may struggle with scalability and performance when dealing with large codebases.
Community and Support: Bitbucket has a larger and more active community compared to Gogs. This translates to a wider range of resources, tutorials, and community-driven support for users. Gogs, being a relatively newer platform, has a smaller community and may offer limited resources for support and troubleshooting.

In Summary, Bitbucket offers a more visually appealing interface, flexible pricing options, robust collaboration features, extensive integration options, better scalability and performance, and a larger community for support compared to Gogs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Bitbucket, Gogs

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 22, 2020

Review

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

1.1M views1.1M

Comments

Eduardo

Software Engineer at Parrot Software, Inc.

Aug 24, 2021

Decided

Do you have a K8s cluster and you want to deploy some services to it? Gitlab Auto Devops is key to achieve this without breaking a sweat.

We deploy Go services to our K8S clusters with warp speed thanks to Gitlab and it's Auto Devops pipeline.

I haven't seen tooling like this in any other git cloud provider.

292k views292k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Bitbucket	Gogs
Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.	The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.
Unlimited private repositories, charged per user;Best-in-class Jira integration;Built-in CI/CD;Deployment visibility;Embedded Trello boards; Command Instructions;Source Browser;Git Powered Wikis;Integrated Issue Tracking;Code reviews with inline comments;Compare View;Newsfeed;Followers;Developer Profiles;Autocompletion for @username mentions;Support for Mercurial	Activity timeline;SSH/HTTP(S) protocol support;SMTP/LDAP/reverse proxy authentication support;Register/delete/rename account;Create/migrate/mirror/delete/watch/rename/transfer public/private repository;Repository viewer/release/issue tracker/webhooks;Add/remove repository collaborators;Gravatar and cache support;Mail service(register, issue);Administration panel;Supports MySQL, PostgreSQL and SQLite3;Social account login(GitHub, Google, QQ, Weibo)
Statistics
Stacks 41.1K	Stacks 175
Followers 33.4K	Followers 306
Votes 2.8K	Votes 182
Pros & Cons
Pros 905 Free private repos 397 Simple setup 349 Nice ui and tools 342 Unlimited private repositories 240 Affordable git hosting Cons 19 Not much community activity 17 Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui 15 Quite buggy 10 Managed by enterprise Java company 8 CI tool is not free of charge	Pros 36 Self-hosted github like service 31 Very low memory footprint 29 Easy to install / update 17 Lightweight (low minimal req.) runs on Raspberry pi 16 Single binary deploy no dependencies
Integrations
Git AWS Cloud9 Sentry Microsoft Azure npm Trello Slack Confluence Docker Jira	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Bitbucket, Gogs?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

GitLab

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Upsource

Upsource summarizes recent changes in your repository, showing commit messages, authors, quick diffs, links to detailed diff views and associated code reviews. A commit graph helps visualize the history of commits, branches and merges in your repository.

Beanstalk

A single process to commit code, review with the team, and deploy the final result to your customers.

GitBucket

GitBucket provides a Github-like UI and features such as Git repository hosting via HTTP and SSH, repository viewer, issues, wiki and pull request.

BinTray

Bintray offers developers the fastest way to publish and consume OSS software releases. With Bintray's full self-service platform developers have full control over their published software and how it is distributed to the world.

Gitolite

Gitolite allows you to setup git hosting on a central server, with fine-grained access control and many more powerful features. Gitolite is an access control layer on top of git.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs Gogs: What are the differences?

Introduction

User Interface and Design: Bitbucket offers a more modern and visually appealing user interface compared to Gogs. It provides a more user-friendly experience with its intuitive design, making it easier for users to navigate and perform actions.
Pricing and Licensing: Bitbucket offers both free and paid plans, allowing users with different needs to choose the right pricing option. Gogs, on the other hand, is an open-source platform that is completely free to use, making it a suitable choice for users looking for a cost-effective solution.
Collaboration Features: Bitbucket provides a range of collaboration features such as pull requests, inline commenting, and code review tools. These features make it easier for teams to collaborate and review code changes. Gogs, however, has limited collaboration features, making it more suitable for smaller teams or individual developers.
Integration Options: Bitbucket offers a wide range of integrations with other popular development tools such as Jira, Trello, and Slack. This enables seamless workflows and enhances productivity for development teams. Gogs, on the other hand, has fewer integration options, which may limit its capabilities when it comes to integrating with other tools.
Scalability and Performance: Bitbucket is known for its scalability and high performance, making it suitable for larger teams or projects with heavy code repositories. Gogs, although capable of handling smaller projects effectively, may struggle with scalability and performance when dealing with large codebases.
Community and Support: Bitbucket has a larger and more active community compared to Gogs. This translates to a wider range of resources, tutorials, and community-driven support for users. Gogs, being a relatively newer platform, has a smaller community and may offer limited resources for support and troubleshooting.

Bitbucket vs Gogs

Overview

Bitbucket vs Gogs: What are the differences?