Blue Ocean vs GitLab CI: What are the differences?
Developers describe Blue Ocean as "A reboot of the Jenkins CI/CD User Experience". Designed from the ground up for Jenkins Pipeline and compatible with Freestyle jobs, Blue Ocean reduces clutter and increases clarity for every member of your team. On the other hand, GitLab CI is detailed as "GitLab integrated CI to test, build and deploy your code". GitLab offers a continuous integration service. If you add a .gitlab-ci.yml file to the root directory of your repository, and configure your GitLab project to use a Runner, then each merge request or push triggers your CI pipeline.
Blue Ocean and GitLab CI belong to "Continuous Integration" category of the tech stack.
"Beautiful interface" is the primary reason why developers consider Blue Ocean over the competitors, whereas "Robust CI with awesome Docker support" was stated as the key factor in picking GitLab CI.
Blue Ocean is an open source tool with 2.49K GitHub stars and 435 GitHub forks. Here's a link to Blue Ocean's open source repository on GitHub.
According to the StackShare community, GitLab CI has a broader approval, being mentioned in 210 company stacks & 93 developers stacks; compared to Blue Ocean, which is listed in 4 company stacks and 10 developer stacks.
What is Blue Ocean?
What is GitLab CI?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Blue Ocean?
What are the cons of using GitLab CI?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
We use Gitlab CI to unit and component test all of our application/components/modules. Therefore we use Docker runners.
GitLab CI is extremely flexible and easy to use. We also enjoy the elastic build infrastructure which is Docker based.