StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Continuous Integration
  4. Continuous Integration
  5. Blue Ocean vs Jenkins

Blue Ocean vs Jenkins

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jenkins
Jenkins
Stacks59.2K
Followers50.4K
Votes2.2K
GitHub Stars24.6K
Forks9.2K
Blue Ocean
Blue Ocean
Stacks92
Followers167
Votes7
GitHub Stars2.9K
Forks537

Blue Ocean vs Jenkins: What are the differences?

Introduction

Blue Ocean and Jenkins are both continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) platforms used for automating the software development process. However, there are key differences between the two that set them apart. In this article, we will explore the differences between Blue Ocean and Jenkins in detail.

  1. User Interface: Blue Ocean provides a modern and intuitive user interface compared to Jenkins. It offers a sleek and visually appealing dashboard that allows developers to have a better visualization of their pipeline. The UI in Blue Ocean simplifies the process of creating, organizing, and visualizing complex pipelines, making it more user-friendly for both technical and non-technical users.

  2. Pipeline Visualization: Blue Ocean offers a powerful and dynamic visualization of pipelines, providing a clear overview of the software delivery process. It allows developers to easily identify the status of each stage, branch, and job within the pipeline. On the other hand, Jenkins has a less visually appealing pipeline visualization, which can make it harder for developers to grasp the overall pipeline structure and status.

  3. Pipeline Editor: Blue Ocean provides a visual pipeline editor, making it easier for developers to create and modify pipelines. The editor allows users to drag and drop stages, add or remove steps, and set up the overall pipeline flow without having to write code. This feature provides a more intuitive and user-friendly approach compared to Jenkins, where pipelines are typically defined using declarative syntax in a Jenkinsfile.

  4. Extensibility: While Jenkins has an extensive range of plugins available, Blue Ocean is tightly integrated with Jenkins, utilizing its rich plugin ecosystem. Blue Ocean inherits the extensibility of Jenkins, allowing users to leverage the vast number of available plugins for additional functionality. However, Blue Ocean also offers specific plugins and integrations designed to enhance the user experience and improve the usability of its UI.

  5. Supported Technologies: Blue Ocean supports a wide range of modern technologies and cloud platforms out of the box, enabling developers to easily integrate with tools and services commonly used in today's software development landscape. Jenkins, being a more established platform, also supports a wide range of technologies but may require plugin installations or additional configurations to achieve the same level of integration with some modern technologies.

  6. Pipeline Metrics and Analytics: Blue Ocean provides comprehensive pipeline metrics and analytics right out of the box, giving developers insights into the efficiency and performance of their software delivery process. It offers built-in visualizations and historical data on execution times, success rates, and more. Jenkins, while it can also provide metrics and analytics through plugins, may require additional setup and configurations to achieve similar pipeline monitoring capabilities as Blue Ocean.

In summary, Blue Ocean offers a modern and user-friendly interface, powerful pipeline visualization, visual pipeline editor, tight integration with Jenkins plugins, support for modern technologies, and comprehensive pipeline metrics and analytics. These key differences set Blue Ocean apart from Jenkins, providing developers with an enhanced user experience and improved functionalities for continuous integration and delivery.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jenkins, Blue Ocean

Balaramesh
Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceonAzure PipelinesAzure Pipelines.NET.NETJenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k
Comments
Pedro Gil
Pedro Gil

Head of Engineering at lengoo GmbH

May 4, 2021

Decided

We replaced Jenkins with Github Actions for all our repositories hosted on Github. GA has two significant benefits for us compared to an external build tool: it's simpler, and it sits at eye level.

Its simplicity and smooth user experience makes it easier for all developers to adopt, giving them more autonomy.

Sitting at eye level means it's completely run and configured right alongside the code, so that it's easier to observe and adjust our builds as we go.

These two benefits have made "the build" less of a system engineer responsibility and more of a developer tool, giving developers more ownership from code to release.

77.6k views77.6k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

529k views529k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins
Jenkins
Blue Ocean
Blue Ocean

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Designed from the ground up for Jenkins Pipeline and compatible with Freestyle jobs, Blue Ocean reduces clutter and increases clarity for every member of your team.

Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support
Sophisticated visualizations of CD pipelines, allowing for fast and intuitive comprehension of software pipeline status.;Pipeline editor (In Development) that makes automating CD pipelines approachable by guiding the user through an intuitive and visual process to create a pipeline.;Personalization of the Jenkins UI to suit the role-based needs of each member of the DevOps team.;Pinpoint precision when intervention is needed and/or issues arise. The Blue Ocean UI shows where in the pipeline attention is needed, facilitating exception handling and increasing productivity.;Native integration for branch and pull requests enables maximum developer productivity when collaborating on code with others in GitHub and Bitbucket.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
24.6K
GitHub Stars
2.9K
GitHub Forks
9.2K
GitHub Forks
537
Stacks
59.2K
Stacks
92
Followers
50.4K
Followers
167
Votes
2.2K
Votes
7
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 523
    Hosted internally
  • 469
    Free open source
  • 318
    Great to build, deploy or launch anything async
  • 243
    Tons of integrations
  • 211
    Rich set of plugins with good documentation
Cons
  • 13
    Workarounds needed for basic requirements
  • 10
    Groovy with cumbersome syntax
  • 8
    Plugins compatibility issues
  • 7
    Lack of support
  • 7
    Limited abilities with declarative pipelines
Pros
  • 7
    Beautiful interface

What are some alternatives to Jenkins, Blue Ocean?

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Snap CI

Snap CI

Snap CI is a cloud-based continuous integration & continuous deployment tool with powerful deployment pipelines. Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and provides fast feedback so you can deploy with ease.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana