Brakeman vs RuboCop: What are the differences?
Brakeman: A static analysis security vulnerability scanner for Ruby on Rails applications. Free static analysis security tool for Ruby on Rails. Zero-setup security scans for Rails applications based on source code analysis; RuboCop: A Ruby static code analyzer, based on the community Ruby style guide. RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.
Brakeman and RuboCop belong to "Code Review" category of the tech stack.
Brakeman and RuboCop are both open source tools. RuboCop with 10.1K GitHub stars and 2.14K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Brakeman with 5.42K GitHub stars and 555 GitHub forks.
StackShare, Talkable, and WeLab Limited are some of the popular companies that use RuboCop, whereas Brakeman is used by StackShare, Livestorm, and Cambridge Brain Sciences. RuboCop has a broader approval, being mentioned in 44 company stacks & 25 developers stacks; compared to Brakeman, which is listed in 4 company stacks and 3 developer stacks.
To communicate isn’t just getting rid of syntax errors and making code work. The code should communicate ideas to people through a programming language that computers can also understand.
You should adopt semantic variables, classes, modules, and methods names. For instance, in Ruby, we avoid using particular prefixes such as
set_name. In their places, we use directly
My advice is to use idiomatic and features that the programming language you use offers to you whenever possible, and figure out ways to better pass the message.
Why wouldn’t we be worried about semantics, typos, and styles? We should care for the quality of our code, and the many concepts that define it. You can start by using a linter to collect some issues from your codebase automatically.