BrowserStack vs GitLab

Overview

BrowserStack

Stacks2.7K

Followers2.0K

Votes533

GitLab

Stacks63.4K

Followers54.5K

Votes2.5K

GitHub Stars0

Forks0

BrowserStack vs GitLab: What are the differences?

BrowserStack vs. GitLab: BrowserStack is a cloud-based platform that provides instant access to 2000+ real mobile and desktop browsers while GitLab is a web-based DevOps lifecycle tool that provides a Git repository manager providing wiki, issue-tracking, and CI/CD pipeline features out of the box.
Development vs. Testing: GitLab is primarily focused on the development aspect of software engineering, providing tools for version control, issue tracking, code review, and continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines, while BrowserStack is used more for testing purposes, allowing developers to test their applications on a wide range of browsers, devices, and operating systems.
Scope of Usage: BrowserStack is specifically designed for cross-browser compatibility testing and mobile app testing, whereas GitLab is an integrated tool for the entire software development life cycle, including planning, development, testing, and deployment.
Pricing Models: BrowserStack operates on a subscription-based pricing model, where users pay for the number of parallel sessions or minutes used, while GitLab offers different pricing tiers based on the number of users and features required, with a free tier available for small teams.
Collaboration Features: GitLab shines in terms of collaboration features, offering robust merge request functionalities, issue tracking, project management tools, and built-in chat functionality, whereas BrowserStack focuses more on providing a seamless testing environment for individual developers or testing teams.
Support and Community: GitLab has a strong open-source community and extensive documentation to support users, whereas BrowserStack provides dedicated customer support and onboarding assistance to help users navigate their testing platform effectively.

In Summary, BrowserStack and GitLab differ in their primary focus on testing versus development, scope of usage, pricing models, collaboration features, and support offerings.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on BrowserStack, GitLab

Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

BrowserStack	GitLab
BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.	GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.
Get instant access to 20,000+ real mobile devices and browsers, which include real iOS and Android devices, Chrome, IE, Firefox, Safari; Test websites hosted on internal dev and staging environments with zero setup or configuration; Run hundreds of tests concurrently to speed up the execution time of your test suite by more than 10x	Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 0
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 0
Stacks 2.7K	Stacks 63.4K
Followers 2.0K	Followers 54.5K
Votes 533	Votes 2.5K
Pros & Cons
Pros 135 Multiple browsers 76 Ease of use 65 Real browsers 44 Ability to use it locally 27 Good price Cons 2 Very limited choice of minor versions	Pros 508 Self hosted 431 Free 339 Has community edition 242 Easy setup 240 Familiar interface Cons 28 Slow ui performance 9 Introduce breaking bugs every release 6 Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting) 2 Built-in Docker Registry 1 Review Apps feature
Integrations
Cypress QMetry Jira WordPress Shopify Zapier Drone.io Jenkins Slack Gradle	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to BrowserStack, GitLab?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

LambdaTest

LambdaTest platform provides secure, scalable and insightful test orchestration for website, and mobile app testing. Customers at different points in their DevOps lifecycle can leverage Automation and/or Manual testing on LambdaTest.

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

Related Comparisons

BrowserStack vs GitLab: What are the differences?

BrowserStack vs. GitLab: BrowserStack is a cloud-based platform that provides instant access to 2000+ real mobile and desktop browsers while GitLab is a web-based DevOps lifecycle tool that provides a Git repository manager providing wiki, issue-tracking, and CI/CD pipeline features out of the box.
Development vs. Testing: GitLab is primarily focused on the development aspect of software engineering, providing tools for version control, issue tracking, code review, and continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines, while BrowserStack is used more for testing purposes, allowing developers to test their applications on a wide range of browsers, devices, and operating systems.
Scope of Usage: BrowserStack is specifically designed for cross-browser compatibility testing and mobile app testing, whereas GitLab is an integrated tool for the entire software development life cycle, including planning, development, testing, and deployment.
Pricing Models: BrowserStack operates on a subscription-based pricing model, where users pay for the number of parallel sessions or minutes used, while GitLab offers different pricing tiers based on the number of users and features required, with a free tier available for small teams.
Collaboration Features: GitLab shines in terms of collaboration features, offering robust merge request functionalities, issue tracking, project management tools, and built-in chat functionality, whereas BrowserStack focuses more on providing a seamless testing environment for individual developers or testing teams.
Support and Community: GitLab has a strong open-source community and extensive documentation to support users, whereas BrowserStack provides dedicated customer support and onboarding assistance to help users navigate their testing platform effectively.

In Summary, BrowserStack and GitLab differ in their primary focus on testing versus development, scope of usage, pricing models, collaboration features, and support offerings.

BrowserStack vs GitLab

Overview