StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Browser Testing
  5. BrowserStack vs TestDino

BrowserStack vs TestDino

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Stacks2.7K
Followers2.0K
Votes533
TestDino
TestDino
Stacks0
Followers1
Votes1

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

BrowserStack
BrowserStack
TestDino
TestDino

BrowserStack is the leading test platform built for developers & QAs to expand test coverage, scale & optimize testing with cross-browser, real device cloud, accessibility, visual testing, test management, and test observability.

TestDino is an AI-native, Playwright-focused test reporting and management platform with MCP support. It enables Claude Code, Cursor, and LLM-based querying to navigate Playwright reporting, analyze flaky trends, compare environments, and sync complete run context into Jira or Asana.

Get instant access to 20,000+ real mobile devices and browsers, which include real iOS and Android devices, Chrome, IE, Firefox, Safari; Test websites hosted on internal dev and staging environments with zero setup or configuration; Run hundreds of tests concurrently to speed up the execution time of your test suite by more than 10x
Flaky test analysis: finds top flaky tests across CI runs and branches. Solves: random failures, rerun waste, flaky noise, Errors analysis: groups failures and highlights the real failing file/method/line. Solves: noisy stack traces, hard triage, slow debugging, Evidence collection: trace, screenshots, video, console logs attached to failures. Solves: “works locally”, missing logs, can’t reproduce CI failures, Environment analysis: compares failures by OS/browser/runner/env. Solves: CI only failures, linux headless issues, infra based flakes, Test failure classification: bug vs flaky vs infrastructure vs UI change. Solves: wrong prioritization, dev QA blame game, wasted fixing wrong issues, Smart rerun grouping: attempts 1/2/3 grouped. Solves: proving flaky vs real bug, tracking rerun outcomes, retry confusion, AI insights: detects regressions, repeated failures, new failure patterns. Solves: hidden instability trends, late discovery of regressions, AI summaries: one line reason + next action. Solves: long debugging notes, slow understanding for non authors, Test run management: centralized history with commit/branch/duration. Solves: hunting CI artifacts, no single source of truth, GitHub integration: PR checks + commit summaries. Solves: low PR confidence, unstable merges, unclear test status, Slack app: real time failure and flaky alerts. Solves: delayed awareness, silent CI failures, missed regressions, Jira/Linear/Asana/Monday: auto create issues with full context. Solves: manual ticket creation, missing reproduction details, slow handoff, MCP server: query test runs/errors/flakes via AI tools. Solves: slow investigation, manual searching, lack of AI assisted debugging workflow.
Statistics
Stacks
2.7K
Stacks
0
Followers
2.0K
Followers
1
Votes
533
Votes
1
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 135
    Multiple browsers
  • 76
    Ease of use
  • 65
    Real browsers
  • 44
    Ability to use it locally
  • 27
    Good price
Cons
  • 2
    Very limited choice of minor versions
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Cypress
Cypress
QMetry
QMetry
Jira
Jira
WordPress
WordPress
Shopify
Shopify
Zapier
Zapier
Drone.io
Drone.io
Jenkins
Jenkins
Slack
Slack
GitLab
GitLab
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to BrowserStack, TestDino?

Selenium

Selenium

Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

Sauce Labs

Sauce Labs

Cloud-based automated testing platform enables developers and QEs to perform functional, JavaScript unit, and manual tests with Selenium or Appium on web and mobile apps. Videos and screenshots for easy debugging. Secure and CI-ready.

TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)

TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)

TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) is a Full Stack Agentic AI Quality Engineering platform that empowers teams to test intelligently and ship faster. Engineered for scale, it offers end-to-end AI agents to plan, author, execute, and analyze software quality. AI-native by design, the platform enables testing of web, mobile, and enterprise applications at any scale across real devices, real browsers, and custom real-world environments.

Karma

Karma

Karma is not a testing framework, nor an assertion library. Karma just launches a HTTP server, and generates the test runner HTML file you probably already know from your favourite testing framework. So for testing purposes you can use pretty much anything you like.

Playwright

Playwright

It is a Node library to automate the Chromium, WebKit and Firefox browsers with a single API. It enables cross-browser web automation that is ever-green, capable, reliable and fast.

Rainforest QA

Rainforest QA

Rainforest gives you the reliability of a QA team and the speed of automation, without the hassle of managing a team or the pain of writing automated tests.

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO

WebdriverIO lets you control a browser or a mobile application with just a few lines of code. Your test code will look simple, concise and easy to read.

Testrail

Testrail

TestRail helps you manage and track your software testing efforts and organize your QA department. Its intuitive web-based user interface makes it easy to create test cases, manage test runs and coordinate your entire testing process.

TestingBot

TestingBot

TestingBot provides automated and Manual cross browser testing in the cloud. Make sure your website looks ok in all browsers.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana