Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

CakePHP
CakePHP

451
204
+ 1
127
Materialize
Materialize

470
512
+ 1
524
Add tool

CakePHP vs Materialize: What are the differences?

Developers describe CakePHP as "The Rapid Development Framework for PHP". CakePHP makes building web applications simpler, faster, while requiring less code. A modern PHP 7 framework offering a flexible database access layer and a powerful scaffolding system. On the other hand, Materialize is detailed as "A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design". A CSS Framework based on material design.

CakePHP belongs to "Frameworks (Full Stack)" category of the tech stack, while Materialize can be primarily classified under "Front-End Frameworks".

"Open source" is the primary reason why developers consider CakePHP over the competitors, whereas "Google material design" was stated as the key factor in picking Materialize.

CakePHP and Materialize are both open source tools. Materialize with 36.1K GitHub stars and 4.8K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than CakePHP with 7.9K GitHub stars and 3.4K GitHub forks.

The3ballsoft, GeoLytix, and Avhana Health are some of the popular companies that use Materialize, whereas CakePHP is used by Swat.io, Walls.io, and Zumba. Materialize has a broader approval, being mentioned in 46 company stacks & 56 developers stacks; compared to CakePHP, which is listed in 66 company stacks and 29 developer stacks.

What is CakePHP?

CakePHP makes building web applications simpler, faster, while requiring less code. A modern PHP 7 framework offering a flexible database access layer and a powerful scaffolding system.

What is Materialize?

A CSS Framework based on material design.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose CakePHP?
Why do developers choose Materialize?

Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

    Be the first to leave a con
    What companies use CakePHP?
    What companies use Materialize?

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with CakePHP?
    What tools integrate with Materialize?
      No integrations found

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      What are some alternatives to CakePHP and Materialize?
      Laravel
      It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.
      CodeIgniter
      CodeIgniter is a proven, agile & open PHP web application framework with a small footprint. It is powering the next generation of web apps.
      WordPress
      The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.
      Rails
      Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.
      PHP
      Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.
      See all alternatives
      Decisions about CakePHP and Materialize
      No stack decisions found
      Interest over time
      Reviews of CakePHP and Materialize
      Avatar of LukeWatts85
      Full-stack Developer at Three.ie
      Review ofCakePHPCakePHP

      The main pro of CakePHP is "bake" functionality and use of conventions, which, if you follow them and buy into them you can really create some complex, large applications quite fast. Faster than any other PHP framework I've ever used, and I've tried all the popular ones.

      However, my issues with Cake are as follows:

      The ORM is slow. Slower than many of the alternatives. It's queries sometimes do strange things like querying 2 tables separately instead of using a join and I've often faced memory issues stemming from the ORM.

      The code conventions, while since 3 they have adopted PSR-2 are still a long way to go to being as compliant with the many PSRs as say, Laravel and Symfony. For example the controllers have an "initialize" method which is doing what you would/should do in __construct. Bugs me.

      The template layer needs to be Twig and not the ctp one. This is where the conventions fall apart and I've seen controller code, and tonnes of php logic in views because ctp offers nothing useful, unlike twig or blade templates which are very clean in comparison.

      That said I work on a project with hundreds of models and controllers and it holds up really well. I couldn't imagine the same application in Laravel or Symfony. It would be a mess.

      Review ofMaterializeMaterialize

      I've been using materialize and I'm really happy with it, in some months I'm sure it will become one of the best front-end frameworks around the internet, because it's easy and fast to use and to get started with it.

      It also got a nice community of developers that help developing it and finding bugs, as well a translation team, looking to get materialize into the major countries.

      My final review is that is one of the best front-end frameworks I've ever found and get used really fast and it's one of the most comfortable frameworks to use as well.

      Avatar of grigb
      Owner at Lumeneo
      Review ofMaterializeMaterialize

      As I've been applying Materialize, I've discovered some limitations.

      For example, the tabs require ids for the content divs. This makes is difficult to create content dynamically.

      The documentation is not accurate.

      To use materializecss, you will need to review the source code often.

      Review ofCakePHPCakePHP

      CakePhp has is own Comunity and its very coprative they helpd me lot wen i wind no way to resolve a problem then i go for googling and Stack OverFlow but when we could not find any answer then we have to just post and shere issue with CakePhp Community and get answer Shortly

      Avatar of grigb
      Owner at Lumeneo
      Review ofMaterializeMaterialize

      As I've been applying Materialize, I've discovered some limitations.

      The Glitter page: https://gitter.im/Dogfalo/materialize provided excellent support though. Kudos!

      Review ofMaterializeMaterialize

      It is very easy to use. Very good community and documentation :P. Keep up the good work.

      How developers use CakePHP and Materialize
      Avatar of Dynamictivity
      Dynamictivity uses CakePHPCakePHP

      CakePHP is used because it is a very feature-complete, battle-tested rapid development framework. This saves us months of development time because the API's do most of the work. There is also an extensive plugin and community built around this platform.

      Avatar of Digital2Go
      Digital2Go uses CakePHPCakePHP

      CakePHP is one of the most mature and developed PHP Frameworks available, it brings order to Chaos and the core team are a decent bunch of people who really care about the project

      Avatar of Kim Do Hyeon
      Kim Do Hyeon uses MaterializeMaterialize

      부트스트랩은 너무 흔해서 적당히 흔하고 좋은거 찾다가 발견

      Avatar of Undisclosed, Do Not Contact or Spam Please
      Undisclosed, Do Not Contact or Spam Please uses CakePHPCakePHP

      Admin interface for users.

      Avatar of ajuria
      ajuria uses CakePHPCakePHP

      The best FW

      How much does CakePHP cost?
      How much does Materialize cost?
      Pricing unavailable
      News about CakePHP
      More news
      News about Materialize
      More news