StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Task Scheduling
  4. Workflow Manager
  5. Camunda vs Microsoft Power Automate

Camunda vs Microsoft Power Automate

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Camunda
Camunda
Stacks192
Followers216
Votes0
Microsoft Power Automate
Microsoft Power Automate
Stacks164
Followers119
Votes0

Camunda vs Microsoft Power Automate: What are the differences?

Introduction

Camunda and Microsoft Power Automate are both popular workflow automation tools that provide a wide range of features for automating business processes. While they have some similarities, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Integration Capabilities: Camunda provides extensive integration capabilities with various systems and applications through its REST API, Java API, and supported connectors. On the other hand, Microsoft Power Automate offers seamless integration with other Microsoft products and services, such as Office 365, SharePoint, Dynamics 365, and more. It also has a vast range of connectors for other third-party systems.

  2. Low-Code vs No-Code: Camunda is a low-code workflow automation platform, which means that it requires some programming knowledge to create and configure workflows. It offers a visual modeling tool, but developers need to write code for implementing custom tasks and logic. Microsoft Power Automate, on the other hand, is a no-code platform that allows users to create workflows using a graphical interface without any programming knowledge. It is designed for business users to easily automate their processes.

  3. Scalability and Performance: Camunda is known for its scalability and performance, capable of handling large volumes of process instances and transactions. It provides clustering and horizontal scaling options to distribute the workload across multiple nodes. Microsoft Power Automate, while scalable, is more suitable for smaller to medium-sized workflows and may have limitations when it comes to handling complex and high-volume processes.

  4. BPMN Support: Camunda fully supports the BPMN 2.0 (Business Process Model and Notation) standard, which is widely used for modeling and executing business processes. It provides a comprehensive set of BPMN elements and advanced features for process modeling and execution. Microsoft Power Automate, on the other hand, does not have native support for BPMN and uses its own workflow definition language. While it offers a range of actions and controls, it may not have the same level of flexibility and standardization as Camunda in terms of BPMN modeling.

  5. Execution Environment: Camunda can be deployed on-premises or in the cloud, providing flexibility in choosing the execution environment based on the organization's requirements and preferences. It can also be integrated with other systems and services as needed. Microsoft Power Automate is a cloud-based platform that runs on Microsoft Azure. While it offers the advantage of easy access and setup, it may have limitations for organizations that prefer on-premises deployments or have specific security and compliance requirements.

  6. Advanced Features: Camunda provides advanced features such as event-based subprocesses, conditional branching, complex gateways, message events, and more. It also supports multi-instance processes, compensation handling, and error handling. Microsoft Power Automate, while versatile, may not offer the same level of advanced features and flexibility in process modeling and execution.

In summary, Camunda offers advanced features, extensive integration capabilities, and scalability, but requires some programming knowledge. Microsoft Power Automate is a no-code platform with seamless integration with Microsoft products, but may have limitations in terms of scalability and advanced BPMN support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Camunda
Camunda
Microsoft Power Automate
Microsoft Power Automate

Camunda enables organizations to operationalize and automate AI, integrating human tasks, existing and future systems without compromising security, governance, or innovation.

Microsoft Power Automate is a cloud-first, comprehensive automation platform, powered by low-code and AI. Modernize business processes, integrate operations at scale, and maintain visibility and control with enterprise-grade governance.

Agentic orchestration; Process orchestration; Workflow automation; Decision automation
Robotic process automation; RPA; Digital process automation; DPA; Artificial intelligence; AI; GPT; Intelligent document process; IDP; Process mining; Task mining
Statistics
Stacks
192
Stacks
164
Followers
216
Followers
119
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
Twilio SendGrid
Twilio SendGrid
Asana
Asana
HubSpot
HubSpot
Slack
Slack
GitLab
GitLab
ActiveMQ
ActiveMQ
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ
Kafka
Kafka
Redis
Redis
Google Cloud VPC
Google Cloud VPC
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft SharePoint
Microsoft SharePoint
Azure Active Directory
Azure Active Directory
Windows
Windows
Microsoft Power Fx
Microsoft Power Fx
Microsoft Excel
Microsoft Excel
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft Teams
Microsoft PowerApps
Microsoft PowerApps
Microsoft Outlook
Microsoft Outlook
Microsoft 365
Microsoft 365

What are some alternatives to Camunda, Microsoft Power Automate?

Airflow

Airflow

Use Airflow to author workflows as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) of tasks. The Airflow scheduler executes your tasks on an array of workers while following the specified dependencies. Rich command lines utilities makes performing complex surgeries on DAGs a snap. The rich user interface makes it easy to visualize pipelines running in production, monitor progress and troubleshoot issues when needed.

Zapier

Zapier

Zapier is for busy people who know their time is better spent selling, marketing, or coding. Instead of wasting valuable time coming up with complicated systems - you can use Zapier to automate the web services you and your team are already using on a daily basis.

IFTTT

IFTTT

It helps you connect all of your different apps and devices. You can enable your apps and devices to work together to do specific things they couldn't do otherwise.

n8n

n8n

It is a free node based Workflow Automation Tool. Easily automate tasks accross different services. Synchronise data between different apps/databases.

GitHub Actions

GitHub Actions

It makes it easy to automate all your software workflows, now with world-class CI/CD. Build, test, and deploy your code right from GitHub. Make code reviews, branch management, and issue triaging work the way you want.

Ghost Inspector

Ghost Inspector

It lets you create and manage UI tests that check specific functionality in your website or application. We execute these automated browser tests continuously from the cloud and alert you if anything breaks.

Apache Beam

Apache Beam

It implements batch and streaming data processing jobs that run on any execution engine. It executes pipelines on multiple execution environments.

Zenaton

Zenaton

Developer framework to orchestrate multiple services and APIs into your software application using logic triggered by events and time. Build ETL processes, A/B testing, real-time alerts and personalized user experiences with custom logic.

Luigi

Luigi

It is a Python module that helps you build complex pipelines of batch jobs. It handles dependency resolution, workflow management, visualization etc. It also comes with Hadoop support built in.

Unito

Unito

Build and map powerful workflows across tools to save your team time. No coding required. Create rules to define what information flows between each of your tools, in minutes.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase