Centreon vs Zabbix

Overview

Zabbix

Stacks684

Followers981

Votes66

GitHub Stars5.3K

Forks1.1K

Centreon

Stacks42

Followers84

Votes0

GitHub Stars136

Forks52

Centreon vs Zabbix: What are the differences?

Centreon and Zabbix are both popular monitoring systems used to monitor infrastructure and services in an IT environment. Let's explore the key differences between them.

Architecture: Centreon is a modular system that consists of various components, including a monitoring engine, web interface, and database. On the other hand, Zabbix has a more integrated and monolithic architecture, with all components tightly integrated into a single software package. This difference in architecture can impact the scalability and flexibility of the monitoring solution.
Ease of Use: Centreon is known for its user-friendly and intuitive web interface, making it easy for users to navigate and configure. Zabbix, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve and may require more technical expertise to set up and use effectively. The ease of use may be an important factor for organizations with limited resources or less technical staff.
Flexibility: Centreon offers a wide range of features and extensions, allowing users to tailor the monitoring solution to their specific needs. It supports various plugins and connectors, making it more flexible in integrating with different systems and technologies. Zabbix, while also providing flexibility, may have a more limited selection of plugins and integrations available.
Scalability: Centreon is known for its ability to scale up and monitor large infrastructures with thousands of hosts and services. It offers distributed architecture options and efficient data processing mechanisms, making it suitable for enterprises with complex and extensive IT environments. Zabbix, while also scalable, may not offer the same level of performance and scalability as Centreon in very large-scale deployments.
Monitoring Capabilities: Centreon provides comprehensive monitoring capabilities, including server monitoring, network monitoring, and application monitoring. It offers support for a wide range of monitoring protocols and technologies. Zabbix, while also offering similar monitoring capabilities, may have a stronger focus on server and network monitoring rather than application monitoring.
Community support and ecosystem: Centreon has a strong and active community, with regular updates and contributions from the user base. It has a well-established ecosystem of plugins, extensions, and integrations. Zabbix also has an active community, but the ecosystem may not be as extensive as Centreon's. The availability of community support and a rich ecosystem can be important factors in the long-term viability and extensibility of the monitoring solution.

In summary, Centreon is a comprehensive IT monitoring platform that offers centralized monitoring of networks, systems, applications, and more, with a user-friendly interface and customizable dashboards. Zabbix, on the other hand, is an open-source monitoring software that provides real-time monitoring and metrics collection, offering scalability and extensive customization options through its flexible architecture.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Zabbix, Centreon

vivek

Jun 8, 2020

Needs adviceon

Centreon

Zabbix

Datadog

My team is divided on using Centreon or Zabbix for enterprise monitoring and alert automation. Can someone let us know which one is better? There is one more tool called Datadog that we are using for cloud assets. Of course, Datadog presents us with huge bills. So we want to have a comparative study. Suggestions and advice are welcome. Thanks!

795k views795k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Zabbix	Centreon
Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.	It is a network, system, applicative supervision and monitoring tool. It is one of the most flexible and powerful monitoring softwares on the market; it is absolutely free and Open Souce.
Smart, Highly Automated Metric Collection; Advanced Problem Detection; Intelligent Alerting and Remediation	Supervision of hybrid infrastructures, from one end to the other;Open and flexible architecture that fits your organization;Open-source solution, downloadable for free; The supervision of dynamic infrastructures, with ease
Statistics
GitHub Stars 5.3K	GitHub Stars 136
GitHub Forks 1.1K	GitHub Forks 52
Stacks 684	Stacks 42
Followers 981	Followers 84
Votes 66	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 21 Free 9 Alerts 5 Service/node/network discovery 5 Templates 4 Base metrics from the box Cons 5 The UI is in PHP 2 Puppet module is sluggish	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Slack Jira PagerDuty Grafana Ansible Skype Chef Bugzilla HipChat ServiceNow.com	Amazon RDS Amazon CloudFront Amazon ElastiCache AWS Lambda Azure Active Directory Cassandra Azure Storage Amazon S3 Azure Monitor Azure SQL Database

What are some alternatives to Zabbix, Centreon?

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Netdata

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).

Jaeger

Jaeger, a Distributed Tracing System

Related Comparisons

Centreon vs Zabbix: What are the differences?

Centreon and Zabbix are both popular monitoring systems used to monitor infrastructure and services in an IT environment. Let's explore the key differences between them.

Architecture: Centreon is a modular system that consists of various components, including a monitoring engine, web interface, and database. On the other hand, Zabbix has a more integrated and monolithic architecture, with all components tightly integrated into a single software package. This difference in architecture can impact the scalability and flexibility of the monitoring solution.
Ease of Use: Centreon is known for its user-friendly and intuitive web interface, making it easy for users to navigate and configure. Zabbix, on the other hand, has a steeper learning curve and may require more technical expertise to set up and use effectively. The ease of use may be an important factor for organizations with limited resources or less technical staff.
Flexibility: Centreon offers a wide range of features and extensions, allowing users to tailor the monitoring solution to their specific needs. It supports various plugins and connectors, making it more flexible in integrating with different systems and technologies. Zabbix, while also providing flexibility, may have a more limited selection of plugins and integrations available.
Scalability: Centreon is known for its ability to scale up and monitor large infrastructures with thousands of hosts and services. It offers distributed architecture options and efficient data processing mechanisms, making it suitable for enterprises with complex and extensive IT environments. Zabbix, while also scalable, may not offer the same level of performance and scalability as Centreon in very large-scale deployments.
Monitoring Capabilities: Centreon provides comprehensive monitoring capabilities, including server monitoring, network monitoring, and application monitoring. It offers support for a wide range of monitoring protocols and technologies. Zabbix, while also offering similar monitoring capabilities, may have a stronger focus on server and network monitoring rather than application monitoring.
Community support and ecosystem: Centreon has a strong and active community, with regular updates and contributions from the user base. It has a well-established ecosystem of plugins, extensions, and integrations. Zabbix also has an active community, but the ecosystem may not be as extensive as Centreon's. The availability of community support and a rich ecosystem can be important factors in the long-term viability and extensibility of the monitoring solution.

Centreon vs Zabbix

Overview