Chakra UI vs Material-UI

Overview

Material-UI

Stacks2.7K

Followers3.7K

Votes445

Chakra UI

Stacks217

Followers297

Votes18

GitHub Stars39.9K

Forks3.5K

Chakra UI vs Material-UI: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between Chakra UI and Material-UI, two popular UI component libraries for building websites.

Variety of Components: Chakra UI offers a comprehensive set of ready-to-use components, including buttons, forms, modals, and more. Material-UI, on the other hand, provides an extensive collection of components inspired by Google's Material Design guidelines. Material-UI includes components like cards, grids, tables, and sliders, which are designed with a recognizable look and feel.
Design Philosophy: Chakra UI focuses on providing a simple and customizable design system, allowing developers to easily extend and customize the appearance and behavior of components. Material-UI, on the other hand, follows Google's Material Design principles and guidelines, providing a consistent and familiar user experience across different platforms.
Styling Approach: Chakra UI uses a utility-based styling approach, where styles can be applied directly using inline props or utility classes. Material-UI, on the other hand, follows a more traditional CSS-in-JS approach, allowing developers to define styles using JavaScript objects or CSS-in-JS libraries like JSS.
Compatibility with other frameworks: Chakra UI is primarily built for React applications and seamlessly integrates with React frameworks like Next.js and Gatsby. Material-UI, on the other hand, is framework-agnostic and can be used with different JavaScript frameworks like React, Angular, and Vue.
Accessibility: Chakra UI emphasizes accessibility and provides built-in support for keyboard navigation, screen readers, and other accessibility features. Material-UI also prioritizes accessibility and includes features like accessible icons, focus management, and proper ARIA attributes to ensure a fully accessible user interface.
Documentation and Community: Chakra UI has a well-documented website with detailed examples, guides, and API references. It also has an active community on GitHub and Discord, providing support and sharing user experiences. Material-UI, being one of the most popular UI component libraries, has an extensive documentation website with comprehensive guides, usage examples, and a large community on GitHub and StackOverflow for support.

In summary, Chakra UI offers a comprehensive set of customizable components with a utility-based styling approach, primarily for React applications, while Material-UI provides an extensive collection of components based on Google's Material Design guidelines, allowing compatibility with multiple frameworks and prioritizing accessibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Material-UI, Chakra UI

Abigail

Dec 10, 2019

Decided

Fonts and typography are fun. Material Design is a framework (developed by Google) that basically geeks out on how to assemble your typographical elements together into a design language. If you're into fonts and typography, it's fantastic. It provides a theming engine, reusable components, and can pull different user interfaces together under a common design paradigm. I'd highly recommend looking into Borries Schwesinger's book "The Form Book" if you're going to be working with Material UI or are otherwise new to component design.

https://www.amazon.com/Form-Book-Creating-Printed-Online/dp/0500515085

766k views766k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Material-UI	Chakra UI
Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.	It is a simple, modular and accessible component library that gives you all the building blocks you need to build your React applications.
Tables; Forms; Snackbars; Buttons; Theming	Ease of Styling; Flexible & composable; Dark Mode
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 39.9K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 3.5K
Stacks 2.7K	Stacks 217
Followers 3.7K	Followers 297
Votes 445	Votes 18
Pros & Cons
Pros 141 React 82 Material Design 60 Ui components 30 CSS framework 26 Component Cons 36 Hard to learn. Bad documentation 29 Hard to customize 22 Hard to understand Docs 9 Bad performance 7 For editable table component need to use material-table	Pros 7 Typescript Support 4 Accessibility 4 Responsiveness 3 Good documentation Cons 2 Hard to customise 1 # of components 1 Inflexible token structure 1 Styling system
Integrations
React Emotion Next.js styled-components Node.js	React

What are some alternatives to Material-UI, Chakra UI?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Blazor

Blazor is a .NET web framework that runs in any browser. You author Blazor apps using C#/Razor and HTML.

Quasar Framework

Build responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, PWAs, Hybrid Mobile Apps and Electron Apps, all using the same codebase!, powered with Vue.

Nuxt.js

Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. You can use Nuxt.js for SSR, SPA, Static Generated, PWA and more.

UIkIt

UIkit gives you a comprehensive collection of HTML, CSS, and JS components which is simple to use, easy to customize and extendable.

Tailwind CSS

Tailwind is different from frameworks like Bootstrap, Foundation, or Bulma in that it's not a UI kit. It doesn't have a default theme, and there are no build-in UI components. It comes with a menu of predesigned widgets to build your site with, but doesn't impose design decisions that are difficult to undo.

Related Comparisons

Chakra UI vs Material-UI: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between Chakra UI and Material-UI, two popular UI component libraries for building websites.

Variety of Components: Chakra UI offers a comprehensive set of ready-to-use components, including buttons, forms, modals, and more. Material-UI, on the other hand, provides an extensive collection of components inspired by Google's Material Design guidelines. Material-UI includes components like cards, grids, tables, and sliders, which are designed with a recognizable look and feel.
Design Philosophy: Chakra UI focuses on providing a simple and customizable design system, allowing developers to easily extend and customize the appearance and behavior of components. Material-UI, on the other hand, follows Google's Material Design principles and guidelines, providing a consistent and familiar user experience across different platforms.
Styling Approach: Chakra UI uses a utility-based styling approach, where styles can be applied directly using inline props or utility classes. Material-UI, on the other hand, follows a more traditional CSS-in-JS approach, allowing developers to define styles using JavaScript objects or CSS-in-JS libraries like JSS.
Compatibility with other frameworks: Chakra UI is primarily built for React applications and seamlessly integrates with React frameworks like Next.js and Gatsby. Material-UI, on the other hand, is framework-agnostic and can be used with different JavaScript frameworks like React, Angular, and Vue.
Accessibility: Chakra UI emphasizes accessibility and provides built-in support for keyboard navigation, screen readers, and other accessibility features. Material-UI also prioritizes accessibility and includes features like accessible icons, focus management, and proper ARIA attributes to ensure a fully accessible user interface.
Documentation and Community: Chakra UI has a well-documented website with detailed examples, guides, and API references. It also has an active community on GitHub and Discord, providing support and sharing user experiences. Material-UI, being one of the most popular UI component libraries, has an extensive documentation website with comprehensive guides, usage examples, and a large community on GitHub and StackOverflow for support.

Chakra UI vs Material-UI

Overview

Chakra UI vs Material-UI: What are the differences?