StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Monitoring
  4. Monitoring Tools
  5. Checkmk vs NetData

Checkmk vs NetData

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Checkmk
Checkmk
Stacks77
Followers99
Votes0
Netdata
Netdata
Stacks226
Followers392
Votes82

Checkmk vs NetData: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Checkmk and NetData

Checkmk and NetData are two popular monitoring tools that are used in managing and monitoring IT infrastructure. While both tools have similarities in terms of monitoring capabilities, there are several key differences that set them apart.

  1. Architecture: Checkmk is based on a server-client architecture, where the monitoring server collects data from remote hosts using agents or plugins. On the other hand, NetData follows an agentless architecture, where it directly collects data from the monitored hosts through a web-based dashboard. This distinction in architecture affects the deployment and scalability of the tools.

  2. Ease of Installation: NetData prides itself on its simplicity and ease of installation. It is a single binary that can be run on almost any Linux distribution without any additional dependencies. Checkmk, on the other hand, requires more setup and configuration, as it relies on various components such as the monitoring server, agents, and plugins.

  3. User Interface: Checkmk offers a comprehensive web-based user interface that provides a wide range of features and customization options. It allows users to create custom dashboards, graphs, and reports. NetData, on the other hand, has a minimalist and intuitive interface that focuses on real-time monitoring and immediate visibility of system metrics.

  4. Alerting and Notification: Checkmk offers advanced alerting capabilities, allowing users to configure thresholds and notifications based on various conditions. It supports different notification channels such as email, SMS, and external integrations. NetData, on the other hand, provides basic alerting functionality with the ability to send email notifications when predefined thresholds are exceeded.

  5. Integration and Extensibility: Checkmk is known for its extensive integrations and plugin support, making it suitable for monitoring a wide range of systems and applications. It has a large community that contributes to the development of plugins and extensions. NetData, while not as extensible as Checkmk, provides support for some plugins and has a REST API for integration with external systems.

  6. Scalability: Checkmk is designed to handle large-scale monitoring deployments with thousands of hosts and services. It supports distributed monitoring setups and provides features like distributed monitoring servers and centralized configuration management. NetData, while not as scalable as Checkmk, can handle monitoring of small to medium-sized environments effectively.

In Summary, Checkmk and NetData differ in terms of their architecture, ease of installation, user interface, alerting capabilities, integration options, and scalability. These differences should be considered when choosing a monitoring tool based on specific requirements and use cases.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Checkmk
Checkmk
Netdata
Netdata

Checkmk is a comprehensive solution for IT Monitoring of servers, applications, networks, cloud infrastructures (public, private, hybrid), containers, storage, databases and environment sensors.

Netdata collects metrics per second & presents them in low-latency dashboards. It's designed to run on all of your physical & virtual servers, cloud deployments, Kubernetes clusters & edge/IoT devices, to monitor systems, containers & apps

State-based monitoring; Log- and event-based monitoring;Graphing and analytics;Customizable GUI;Reporting;Business Intelligence;Hardware and software inventory;Notifications and alert handler;Rule-based configuration, auto-discovery and agent deployment; Scalability; User Management with LDAP/Active Directory;Predictive Monitoring; Capacity Management; Single Sign-On; Dynamic host configuration
Free, open-source; Easy installation and configuration; Access to monitoring unlimited metrics; Prebuilt dashboards and alarms; alerts on any metric, for a single host, an entire cluster, or your entire infrastructure; Tools for team collaboration; 800+ integrations
Statistics
Stacks
77
Stacks
226
Followers
99
Followers
392
Votes
0
Votes
82
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 17
    Free
  • 14
    Easy setup
  • 12
    Graphs are interactive
  • 9
    Montiors datasbases
  • 9
    Well maintained on github
Integrations
No integrations available
Puppet Labs
Puppet Labs
CouchDB
CouchDB
ActiveMQ
ActiveMQ
Logstash
Logstash
Fail2ban
Fail2ban
TimescaleDB
TimescaleDB
Windows
Windows
Grafana
Grafana
MongoDB
MongoDB
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ

What are some alternatives to Checkmk, Netdata?

Grafana

Grafana

Grafana is a general purpose dashboard and graph composer. It's focused on providing rich ways to visualize time series metrics, mainly though graphs but supports other ways to visualize data through a pluggable panel architecture. It currently has rich support for for Graphite, InfluxDB and OpenTSDB. But supports other data sources via plugins.

Kibana

Kibana

Kibana is an open source (Apache Licensed), browser based analytics and search dashboard for Elasticsearch. Kibana is a snap to setup and start using. Kibana strives to be easy to get started with, while also being flexible and powerful, just like Elasticsearch.

Prometheus

Prometheus

Prometheus is a systems and service monitoring system. It collects metrics from configured targets at given intervals, evaluates rule expressions, displays the results, and can trigger alerts if some condition is observed to be true.

Nagios

Nagios

Nagios is a host/service/network monitoring program written in C and released under the GNU General Public License.

Zabbix

Zabbix

Zabbix is a mature and effortless enterprise-class open source monitoring solution for network monitoring and application monitoring of millions of metrics.

Sensu

Sensu

Sensu is the future-proof solution for multi-cloud monitoring at scale. The Sensu monitoring event pipeline empowers businesses to automate their monitoring workflows and gain deep visibility into their multi-cloud environments.

Graphite

Graphite

Graphite does two things: 1) Store numeric time-series data and 2) Render graphs of this data on demand

Lumigo

Lumigo

Lumigo is an observability platform built for developers, unifying distributed tracing with payload data, log management, and real-time metrics to help you deeply understand and troubleshoot your systems.

StatsD

StatsD

It is a network daemon that runs on the Node.js platform and listens for statistics, like counters and timers, sent over UDP or TCP and sends aggregates to one or more pluggable backend services (e.g., Graphite).

Jaeger

Jaeger

Jaeger, a Distributed Tracing System

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana