StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. cheerio vs jQuery

cheerio vs jQuery

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

jQuery
jQuery
Stacks195.3K
Followers70.6K
Votes6.6K
GitHub Stars59.6K
Forks20.5K
cheerio
cheerio
Stacks11
Followers9
Votes0
GitHub Stars29.9K
Forks1.7K

cheerio vs jQuery: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown document, I will provide the key differences between cheerio and jQuery, formatting them as code that can be used on a website.

  1. Lightweight vs. Full-featured: Cheerio is a lightweight library that focuses mainly on parsing and manipulating HTML documents, whereas jQuery is a full-featured library that offers a wide range of functionalities, including CSS manipulation, DOM traversal, event handling, and Ajax handling.
  2. Server-side vs. Client-side: Cheerio is primarily designed for server-side usage with Node.js, allowing developers to parse and manipulate HTML on the server. On the other hand, jQuery is primarily used on the client-side, allowing developers to manipulate the DOM in a web browser.
  3. jQuery Syntax vs. Cheerio Syntax: Cheerio follows a syntax that is very similar to jQuery, making it easy for developers who are familiar with jQuery to transition to Cheerio. However, there may be some subtle differences in syntax, mainly due to Cheerio's focus on server-side usage and its specific implementation requirements.
  4. jQuery Plugins vs. Cheerio Plugins: jQuery has a vast ecosystem of plugins that extend its functionalities and provide additional features. Cheerio, on the other hand, has a more limited plugin ecosystem, mainly focusing on plugins that are compatible with Node.js and server-side usage.
  5. Compatibility with Browsers vs. Server Environments: jQuery is designed to work across different web browsers and ensure consistent behavior across them. Cheerio, being mainly used in server environments, does not have this emphasis on cross-browser compatibility and focuses more on providing a seamless experience within the server environment it is used in.
  6. Performance: Due to its minimalist and lightweight nature, Cheerio is generally faster and more performant when it comes to parsing and manipulating HTML documents compared to jQuery. However, jQuery offers a wider range of functionalities and performance can vary based on the specific use case.

In summary, Cheerio is a lightweight, server-side library primarily used with Node.js for parsing and manipulating HTML documents, while jQuery is a full-featured, client-side library used in web browsers to manipulate the DOM and handle various web functionalities. Cheerio has a syntax similar to jQuery and is focused on server-side usage, while jQuery has a broader plugin ecosystem and emphasizes cross-browser compatibility. Cheerio is generally faster in terms of performance for HTML parsing and manipulation.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

jQuery
jQuery
cheerio
cheerio

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

Fast, flexible, and lean implementation of core jQuery designed specifically for the server.

-
Familiar syntax; Blazingly fast; Incredibly flexible
Statistics
GitHub Stars
59.6K
GitHub Stars
29.9K
GitHub Forks
20.5K
GitHub Forks
1.7K
Stacks
195.3K
Stacks
11
Followers
70.6K
Followers
9
Votes
6.6K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1263
    Cross-browser
  • 957
    Dom manipulation
  • 809
    Power
  • 660
    Open source
  • 610
    Plugins
Cons
  • 6
    Large size
  • 5
    Encourages DOM as primary data source
  • 5
    Sometimes inconsistent API
  • 2
    Live events is overly complex feature
No community feedback yet

What are some alternatives to jQuery, cheerio?

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Riot

Riot

Riot brings custom tags to all browsers. Think React + Polymer but with enjoyable syntax and a small learning curve.

Marko

Marko

Marko is a really fast and lightweight HTML-based templating engine that compiles templates to readable Node.js-compatible JavaScript modules, and it works on the server and in the browser. It supports streaming, async rendering and custom tags.

Kendo UI

Kendo UI

Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase