StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. CloudBees vs GitLab

CloudBees vs GitLab

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CloudBees
CloudBees
Stacks108
Followers164
Votes6
GitLab
GitLab
Stacks63.4K
Followers54.5K
Votes2.5K
GitHub Stars0
Forks0

CloudBees vs GitLab: What are the differences?

Introduction

CloudBees and GitLab are both popular tools used in the DevOps space, but they have key differences that organizations need to consider when choosing the right tool for their requirements. Below are the main differences between CloudBees and GitLab.

  1. Integration with other tools: CloudBees has a strong focus on integration with a wide range of third-party tools and services, making it easier for organizations to seamlessly incorporate it into their existing workflows. GitLab, on the other hand, offers an all-in-one solution with built-in tools for various DevOps processes, reducing the need for external integrations.

  2. Scalability: CloudBees is designed to handle large enterprise-scale projects and can scale effectively to meet the needs of complex organizations. GitLab, while capable of handling large projects, may not offer the same level of scalability and performance as CloudBees for extremely large-scale operations.

  3. Support and services: CloudBees provides dedicated support and services tailored to enterprise users, offering personalized assistance and troubleshooting for complex issues. GitLab, while offering support options, may not provide the same level of dedicated support and services as CloudBees for enterprise clients.

  4. Focus on Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD): CloudBees places a strong emphasis on CI/CD automation and offers advanced features for streamlining the software development lifecycle. GitLab also supports CI/CD processes but may not provide the same level of specialized features and capabilities as CloudBees in this area.

  5. Open-source vs. Commercial: GitLab is primarily known for its open-source version that allows for free usage and community contributions. CloudBees, on the other hand, offers commercial versions with additional features and support, making it a more viable option for organizations looking for comprehensive enterprise solutions.

  6. Security Features: GitLab offers robust security features such as multifactor authentication, extensive permission controls, and vulnerability management tools. CloudBees also provides security features but may not offer the same level of granularity and customization options as GitLab in terms of security management.

In Summary, CloudBees and GitLab have key differences in terms of integration capabilities, scalability, support services, focus on CI/CD, open-source vs. commercial models, and security features. Organizations should carefully evaluate these differences to choose the tool that best aligns with their specific needs.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on CloudBees, GitLab

Anonymous
Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k
Comments
Weverton
Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M
Comments

Detailed Comparison

CloudBees
CloudBees
GitLab
GitLab

Enables organizations to build, test and deploy applications to production, utilizing continuous delivery practices. They are focused solely on Jenkins as a tool for continuous delivery both on-premises and in the cloud.

GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

Hosted CI/CD as a Service; Flexible and governed software delivery automation; Starter Kit; Jenkins Product Support
Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
0
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
0
Stacks
108
Stacks
63.4K
Followers
164
Followers
54.5K
Votes
6
Votes
2.5K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Jenkins
Pros
  • 508
    Self hosted
  • 431
    Free
  • 339
    Has community edition
  • 242
    Easy setup
  • 240
    Familiar interface
Cons
  • 28
    Slow ui performance
  • 9
    Introduce breaking bugs every release
  • 6
    Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting)
  • 2
    Built-in Docker Registry
  • 1
    Review Apps feature
Integrations
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine
Jenkins X
Jenkins X
Codeship
Codeship
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Jenkins
Jenkins
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
Docker
Docker
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to CloudBees, GitLab?

GitHub

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Gogs

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot