StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Platform As A Service
  5. CloudBees vs Jenkins

CloudBees vs Jenkins

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CloudBees
CloudBees
Stacks108
Followers164
Votes6
Jenkins
Jenkins
Stacks59.2K
Followers50.4K
Votes2.2K
GitHub Stars24.6K
Forks9.2K

CloudBees vs Jenkins: What are the differences?

CloudBees and Jenkins are two popular tools used for continuous integration and delivery in software development. While they share similarities, there are key differences between the two.

  1. Enterprise Support: CloudBees offers enterprise-level support to its customers, including service-level agreements (SLAs) and 24/7 technical support. Jenkins, being open-source, relies on community support.

  2. Plugins and Extensions: CloudBees provides a wide range of plugins and extensions specifically designed for enterprise use cases, such as security plugins and governance tools. While Jenkins also has a vast plugin ecosystem, CloudBees offers additional curated plugins and integrations.

  3. Cloud-Native Functionality: CloudBees provides native integrations with popular cloud platforms like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. This allows for seamless deployment and management of applications in the cloud. Jenkins can also be used in the cloud, but CloudBees has built-in features to simplify the process.

  4. Scale and Performance: CloudBees is optimized for large-scale deployments and offers enhanced performance capabilities. It includes features like distributed build processing and elastic scalability out of the box. Jenkins can also handle large deployments, but may require additional configurations to achieve optimal performance.

  5. Security and Compliance: CloudBees provides advanced security features, such as role-based access control (RBAC), single sign-on (SSO), and audit trails. These features are important for organizations with strict security and compliance requirements. While Jenkins has some security features, CloudBees offers additional functionality in this area.

  6. Managed Services: CloudBees offers a managed service called CloudBees Core that eliminates the need for organizations to manage and maintain Jenkins infrastructure themselves. This allows teams to focus on their development tasks without worrying about infrastructure management. Jenkins, being open-source, requires self-hosting and maintenance.

In summary, CloudBees offers additional enterprise support, curated plugins, native cloud functionality, scalability, enhanced security features, and a managed service option compared to Jenkins. Jenkins, being open-source, relies on community support but provides a vast plugin ecosystem and can be self-hosted.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on CloudBees, Jenkins

Balaramesh
Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceonAzure PipelinesAzure Pipelines.NET.NETJenkinsJenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

529k views529k
Comments
Tatiana
Tatiana

Nov 16, 2019

Decided

Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.

CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.

And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.

734k views734k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

CloudBees
CloudBees
Jenkins
Jenkins

Enables organizations to build, test and deploy applications to production, utilizing continuous delivery practices. They are focused solely on Jenkins as a tool for continuous delivery both on-premises and in the cloud.

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Hosted CI/CD as a Service; Flexible and governed software delivery automation; Starter Kit; Jenkins Product Support
Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
24.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
9.2K
Stacks
108
Stacks
59.2K
Followers
164
Followers
50.4K
Votes
6
Votes
2.2K
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Jenkins
Pros
  • 523
    Hosted internally
  • 469
    Free open source
  • 318
    Great to build, deploy or launch anything async
  • 243
    Tons of integrations
  • 211
    Rich set of plugins with good documentation
Cons
  • 13
    Workarounds needed for basic requirements
  • 10
    Groovy with cumbersome syntax
  • 8
    Plugins compatibility issues
  • 7
    Limited abilities with declarative pipelines
  • 7
    Lack of support
Integrations
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine
Jenkins X
Jenkins X
Codeship
Codeship
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Microsoft Azure
Microsoft Azure
Docker
Docker
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to CloudBees, Jenkins?

Heroku

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Google App Engine

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot