Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

CloudBees

95
164
+ 1
6
jFrog

127
103
+ 1
0
Add tool

CloudBees vs jFrog: What are the differences?

Key Differences between CloudBees and jFrog

CloudBees and jFrog are both leading providers in the DevOps space, offering solutions that help organizations streamline their software development and deployment processes. While both companies aim to enhance the efficiency and quality of software development, there are notable differences between CloudBees and jFrog that distinguish them from each other. Here are the key differences:

  1. Product Focus: CloudBees primarily focuses on providing a comprehensive end-to-end continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) platform. Their flagship product, CloudBees CI/CD, offers a suite of features and capabilities that cover the entire software development lifecycle. On the other hand, jFrog is primarily known for its artifact repository manager, JFrog Artifactory. Although jFrog also offers other DevOps tools, its core focus remains on providing a robust artifact management solution.

  2. Integration with External Tools: CloudBees is designed to integrate seamlessly with various external tools commonly used in the DevOps ecosystem. Their platform provides native integrations with popular source code repositories, build tools, testing frameworks, and deployment platforms, among others. On the contrary, while jFrog's Artifactory can integrate with a wide range of tools, it does not provide the same level of out-of-the-box integrations that CloudBees offers.

  3. Security Capabilities: Both CloudBees and jFrog prioritize security in their offerings, but they approach it from different angles. CloudBees places significant emphasis on securing the CI/CD pipeline and ensuring compliance with industry standards and regulations. They offer features such as role-based access control, secure software supply chain management, and vulnerability scanning. In contrast, jFrog focuses on securing the software artifacts themselves. Their Artifactory product provides features like access control, vulnerability scanning, and artifact signing to ensure the integrity and security of the artifacts stored in the repository.

  4. Scalability and Performance: When it comes to scalability and performance, CloudBees and jFrog offer different capabilities. CloudBees CI/CD platform is known for its ability to scale horizontally, allowing organizations to handle increasing workloads and large-scale deployments. Additionally, CloudBees provides advanced features like automated load balancing and resource allocation to optimize performance. On the other hand, jFrog Artifactory is designed to handle massive artifact repositories efficiently. It offers advanced caching and replication capabilities to ensure high availability and fast artifact retrieval.

  5. Community and Ecosystem: CloudBees has a vibrant and active community around its CI/CD platform. They have an extensive ecosystem of plugins and integrations contributed by both CloudBees and community members. This broad community support provides users with access to a wide range of plugins and extensions, enhancing the functionality and versatility of the platform. While jFrog also has an active community around Artifactory, its ecosystem is not as extensive as CloudBees'. However, jFrog's repository manager does offer integration with various third-party tools and has its own set of plugins.

  6. Pricing Model: CloudBees and jFrog have different pricing models. CloudBees follows a subscription-based pricing approach, where customers pay for the number of users and features they require. Their pricing scales based on usage and the level of support needed. On the other hand, jFrog offers a usage-based pricing model, primarily based on the number of developers and the amount of data stored and transferred through their Artifactory product. This model allows organizations to tailor the cost to their specific needs.

In summary, CloudBees focuses on providing a comprehensive CI/CD platform with extensive integration capabilities, while jFrog specializes in artifact management with a robust repository manager. Both companies prioritize security and offer advanced features related to scaling, performance, and community support. The choice between CloudBees and jFrog ultimately depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the organization.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of CloudBees
Pros of jFrog
  • 6
    Jenkins
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    318
    187
    692
    1.1K
    24

    What is CloudBees?

    Enables organizations to build, test and deploy applications to production, utilizing continuous delivery practices. They are focused solely on Jenkins as a tool for continuous delivery both on-premises and in the cloud.

    What is jFrog?

    Host, manage and proxy artifacts using the best Docker Registry, Maven Repository, Gradle repository, NuGet repository, Ruby repository, Debian repository npm repository, Yum repository.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use CloudBees?
    What companies use jFrog?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with CloudBees?
    What tools integrate with jFrog?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    GitCloudBees+2
    3
    4564
    Git.NETCloudBees+3
    6
    1126
    What are some alternatives to CloudBees and jFrog?
    Jenkins
    In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
    CircleCI
    Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.
    Bamboo
    Focus on coding and count on Bamboo as your CI and build server! Create multi-stage build plans, set up triggers to start builds upon commits, and assign agents to your critical builds and deployments.
    Azure DevOps
    Azure DevOps provides unlimited private Git hosting, cloud build for continuous integration, agile planning, and release management for continuous delivery to the cloud and on-premises. Includes broad IDE support.
    GitLab
    GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.
    See all alternatives