Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

CockroachDB

205
327
+ 1
0
Fauna

106
153
+ 1
27
Add tool

CockroachDB vs FaunaDB: What are the differences?

Introduction

CockroachDB and FaunaDB are both distributed databases that offer unique features and functionalities. In order to make an informed decision on which database to use for your project, it is essential to understand the key differences between them.

  1. Architecture: CockroachDB is a distributed SQL database that is fully ACID-compliant, providing horizontal scalability and fault tolerance. It is designed to handle large amounts of data and is suitable for applications that require strong consistency. FaunaDB, on the other hand, is a globally distributed database that offers a serverless approach to development. It focuses on providing a flexible data model and supports multi-region deployments with ease.

  2. Data Model: CockroachDB uses a traditional SQL-based data model, which is well suited for applications that require complex querying and transactions. It supports standard SQL syntax and data types, making it easy for developers familiar with SQL to work with the database. In contrast, FaunaDB uses a schemaless and document-oriented data model inspired by GraphQL. It allows for flexible and dynamic data structures, making it ideal for applications with rapidly changing data requirements.

  3. Consistency Model: CockroachDB offers strong consistency guarantees by default, ensuring that all replicas of the data are always up to date. This makes it a good choice for applications that require strict consistency and do not tolerate stale data. FaunaDB, on the other hand, provides tunable consistency levels, allowing developers to choose between strong and eventual consistency based on their application's requirements.

  4. Ease of Use: CockroachDB is relatively easy to set up and manage, with a focus on simplicity and operational efficiency. It provides a user-friendly SQL interface that is familiar to many developers, making it easy to get started with the database. FaunaDB, on the other hand, offers a fully managed service with automatic scaling and built-in security features. It is designed to be developer-friendly, allowing users to focus on building their applications without worrying about database management tasks.

Summary

In summary, CockroachDB is a distributed SQL database with strong consistency and horizontal scalability, while FaunaDB is a globally distributed database with a flexible data model and serverless approach to development. The choice between the two databases ultimately depends on the specific requirements of your application and the level of control and flexibility you require.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of CockroachDB
Pros of Fauna
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 5
      100% ACID
    • 4
      Generous free tier
    • 4
      Removes server provisioning or maintenance
    • 3
      Low latency global CDN's
    • 3
      No more n+1 problems (+ GraphQL)
    • 3
      Works well with GraphQL
    • 3
      Also supports SQL, CQL
    • 2
      No ORM layer needed

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of CockroachDB
    Cons of Fauna
      Be the first to leave a con
      • 1
        Susceptible to DDoS (& others) use timeouts throttling
      • 1
        Must keep app secrets encrypted
      • 1
        Log stack traces to avoid improper exception handling

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      What is CockroachDB?

      CockroachDB is distributed SQL database that can be deployed in serverless, dedicated, or on-prem. Elastic scale, multi-active availability for resilience, and low latency performance.

      What is Fauna?

      Escape the boundaries imposed by legacy databases with a data API that is simple to adopt, highly productive to use, and offers the capabilities that your business needs, without the operational pain typically associated with databases.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use CockroachDB?
      What companies use Fauna?
      See which teams inside your own company are using CockroachDB or Fauna.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with CockroachDB?
      What tools integrate with Fauna?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      What are some alternatives to CockroachDB and Fauna?
      MySQL
      The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.
      Oracle
      Oracle Database is an RDBMS. An RDBMS that implements object-oriented features such as user-defined types, inheritance, and polymorphism is called an object-relational database management system (ORDBMS). Oracle Database has extended the relational model to an object-relational model, making it possible to store complex business models in a relational database.
      Cassandra
      Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.
      MongoDB
      MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.
      FoundationDB
      FoundationDB is a NoSQL database with a shared nothing architecture. Designed around a "core" ordered key-value database, additional features and data models are supplied in layers. The key-value database, as well as all layers, supports full, cross-key and cross-server ACID transactions.
      See all alternatives