Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
.NET Core vs Cocoa (OS X): What are the differences?
Introduction
The comparison between .NET Core and Cocoa (OS X) will highlight the key differences between these two software development platforms.
Language Compatibility: .NET Core supports multiple programming languages like C#, F#, and Visual Basic, while Cocoa primarily uses Objective-C or Swift for development. This difference gives developers more flexibility in choosing a language suitable for their project requirements.
Platform Compatibility: .NET Core is a cross-platform framework that can run on Windows, macOS, and Linux, providing a wider reach for developers to create applications. In contrast, Cocoa is primarily designed for macOS and iOS development, limiting its compatibility to Apple's operating systems.
Ecosystem and Libraries: .NET Core has a vast ecosystem with a rich set of libraries and frameworks available in the NuGet package manager, offering extensive functionalities for developers. On the other hand, Cocoa has a robust set of Apple frameworks like Cocoa Touch and Cocoa that are specifically designed for macOS and iOS development.
Community Support: .NET Core has a large and active community of developers contributing to its growth and providing support through forums, documentation, and open-source projects. In comparison, the Cocoa community is more concentrated around Apple's developer ecosystem, which may limit the availability of resources for troubleshooting and development assistance.
Tooling and IDE: .NET Core can be developed using various IDEs like Visual Studio, Visual Studio Code, and JetBrains Rider, providing developers with a range of options for their development environment. In contrast, Cocoa development is primarily done using Xcode, Apple's official IDE, which offers a comprehensive set of tools and resources tailored for macOS and iOS development.
Deployment Options: .NET Core applications can be deployed as standalone executables or hosted on various platforms like Azure, Docker, and IIS, offering flexibility in deployment strategies. On the other hand, Cocoa applications are primarily distributed through the Mac App Store or enterprise distribution methods specified by Apple, limiting the deployment options for developers.
In Summary, .NET Core and Cocoa differ in language compatibility, platform compatibility, ecosystem and libraries, community support, tooling and IDE, and deployment options, providing distinct choices for developers based on their project requirements.
I was researching multiple high performance, concurent//parallel languages for the needs of authentication and authorization server, to be built on microservice architecture and Linux OS. Node.js with its asynchronous behavior and event loop suits the case best. Python Django & Flash turns to be slower and .NET Core & Framework wasn't the best choice for the Linux environment at the time (summer 2018).
I also tested Go lang and Rust, although they didn't meet the quick prototyping criteria as both languages are young and lacking libraries or battle-tested ORM.
There has been a lot of buzz around having PostgreSQL for ASP.NET Core 3.1 web apps. But Configuring Identity Server 4 with PostgreSQL is a real challenge. I've made a simple video to configure the ASP.NET Core 3.1 based Web application that uses AngualrJS as front end with Single Page App capabilities with Identity Server 4 talking to the PostgreSQL database. Check out this Video tutorial on how to do that in detail http://bit.ly/2EkotL5 You can access the entire code here on github http://bit.ly/35okpFj
Pros of Cocoa (OS X)
- Great community3
- IOS2
- Backed by apple1
Pros of .NET Core
- Perfect to do any backend ( and a fast frontend) stuff30
- Fast27
- Cross-platform26
- Great performance25
- It promotes better codebase architectures and organizat18
- All Platform (Mac, Linux, Windows)18
- Very fast development with templates11
