Codacy vs Hound: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Codacy and Hound are both code review tools used to improve code quality and ensure best practices are followed in software development projects.

1. Code Language Support: Codacy supports a wide range of programming languages such as Java, JavaScript, Python, Ruby, etc., while Hound focuses mainly on Ruby and JavaScript.

2. Integration with Version Control Systems: Codacy seamlessly integrates with popular version control systems like GitHub, Bitbucket, GitLab, etc., whereas Hound primarily integrates with GitHub.

3. Real-time Feedback: Codacy provides real-time feedback on code quality and issues, making it easier for developers to address and resolve them quickly, whereas Hound does not offer real-time feedback functionalities.

4. Customization and Configurability: Codacy offers extensive customization options such as custom code patterns, thresholds, and rules, allowing teams to tailor the tool to fit their specific needs, whereas Hound has limited customization features.

5. Pricing Structure: Codacy offers a variety of pricing plans including free options for small teams, while Hound is a paid tool with a fixed pricing structure per user.

6. Support for Code Coverage: Codacy provides support for tracking code coverage metrics, aiding developers in ensuring comprehensive test coverage, which is not a feature available in Hound.

In Summary, Codacy and Hound differ in language support, integration capabilities, feedback mechanisms, customization options, pricing structures, and support for code coverage metrics.