StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Code Review
  4. Code Review
  5. Codacy vs Hound

Codacy vs Hound

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Codacy
Codacy
Stacks313
Followers551
Votes248
Hound
Hound
Stacks41
Followers47
Votes14

Codacy vs Hound: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Codacy and Hound are both code review tools used to improve code quality and ensure best practices are followed in software development projects.

  1. Code Language Support: Codacy supports a wide range of programming languages such as Java, JavaScript, Python, Ruby, etc., while Hound focuses mainly on Ruby and JavaScript.

  2. Integration with Version Control Systems: Codacy seamlessly integrates with popular version control systems like GitHub, Bitbucket, GitLab, etc., whereas Hound primarily integrates with GitHub.

  3. Real-time Feedback: Codacy provides real-time feedback on code quality and issues, making it easier for developers to address and resolve them quickly, whereas Hound does not offer real-time feedback functionalities.

  4. Customization and Configurability: Codacy offers extensive customization options such as custom code patterns, thresholds, and rules, allowing teams to tailor the tool to fit their specific needs, whereas Hound has limited customization features.

  5. Pricing Structure: Codacy offers a variety of pricing plans including free options for small teams, while Hound is a paid tool with a fixed pricing structure per user.

  6. Support for Code Coverage: Codacy provides support for tracking code coverage metrics, aiding developers in ensuring comprehensive test coverage, which is not a feature available in Hound.

In Summary, Codacy and Hound differ in language support, integration capabilities, feedback mechanisms, customization options, pricing structures, and support for code coverage metrics.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Codacy
Codacy
Hound
Hound

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

Automated code review for GitHub pull requests. It comments on code quality and style issues, allowing you and your team to better review and maintain a clean codebase.

Available for cloud and self-hosted repositories;Static code analysis for +40 languages;Analysis for cloud infrastructure-as-code frameworks;Automatic analysis integrated in your CI;Code coverage tracking;Support for linter configuration files;1-click autofixes for GitHub;Static IP addresses for allowlisting Codacy;
Open source; Free for public repos; Automated reviews of GitHub pull requests;GitHub App
Statistics
Stacks
313
Stacks
41
Followers
551
Followers
47
Votes
248
Votes
14
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 45
    Automated code review
  • 35
    Easy setup
  • 29
    Free for open source
  • 20
    Customizable
  • 18
    Helps reduce technical debt
Cons
  • 6
    No support for private Git or Azure DevOps git
Pros
  • 4
    Comments on style so I don't have to
  • 3
    Fast
  • 3
    Easy configuration
  • 2
    Free for OSS
  • 2
    Inline comments
Integrations
GitHub
GitHub
GitLab
GitLab
Slack
Slack
Bitbucket
Bitbucket
Jira
Jira
ESLint
ESLint
GitHub
GitHub
SwiftLint
SwiftLint
RuboCop
RuboCop
Credo
Credo

What are some alternatives to Codacy, Hound?

Code Climate

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Phabricator

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

PullReview

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit Code Review

Gerrit is a self-hosted pre-commit code review tool. It serves as a Git hosting server with option to comment incoming changes. It is highly configurable and extensible with default guarding policies, webhooks, project access control and more.

SonarQube

SonarQube

SonarQube provides an overview of the overall health of your source code and even more importantly, it highlights issues found on new code. With a Quality Gate set on your project, you will simply fix the Leak and start mechanically improving.

RuboCop

RuboCop

RuboCop is a Ruby static code analyzer. Out of the box it will enforce many of the guidelines outlined in the community Ruby Style Guide.

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io

CodeFactor.io automatically and continuously tracks code quality with every GitHub or BitBucket commit and pull request, helping software developers save time in code reviews and efficiently tackle technical debt.

ESLint

ESLint

A pluggable and configurable linter tool for identifying and reporting on patterns in JavaScript. Maintain your code quality with ease.

Amazon CodeGuru

Amazon CodeGuru

It is a machine learning service for automated code reviews and application performance recommendations. It helps you find the most expensive lines of code that hurt application performance and keep you up all night troubleshooting, then gives you specific recommendations to fix or improve your code.

Reviewable

Reviewable

A code review tool for GitHub pull requests inspired by Google's internal tool. Powerful diffing and workflow features wrapped in a beautiful UI, with seamless GitHub integration. Free for public repos.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana