Codebrag vs Code Climate: What are the differences?
Developers describe Codebrag as "Have fun while doing code reviews". Codebrag saves you time with well‑organized and enjoyable code reviews. A simple dashboard combined with a game‑like experience brings fun to the process and makes it work for your team. Codebrag gamifies the experience with achievements, leader boards, gravatars and 'Likes' for the code. Codebrag is built by developers with over 10 years experience in programming, working on projects all over the world. It is developed with passion answering a real need to make code reviews an easier and more pleasant experience. On the other hand, Code Climate is detailed as "Automated Ruby Code Review". After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.
Codebrag and Code Climate belong to "Code Review" category of the tech stack.
Some of the features offered by Codebrag are:
- Easily manage all commits and comments in one place
- Track your tasks with a simple To‑Do list
- Allow great code to be praised and have fun while doing reviews.
On the other hand, Code Climate provides the following key features:
- Automated Git Updates- Nothing to install. Code Climate runs everytime you push a new commit.
- Activity Feeds- Up-to-the-minute information so you can see when and how code changes.
- Instant Notifications- Major security and quality changes pushed to where you work: email, Campfire, HipChat, and RSS feeds.
What is Code Climate?
What is Codebrag?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Codebrag?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Codebrag?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
This is one of the key tools I can't leave out when I'm working on a project, basically it is mandatory for me to use it on my Ruby on Rails projects. I think the price is a little expensive for a "Solo plan" but if you can get your client to pay, it's definitely worth it. You or the future developers that will continue with the project will thank you!
We use it as part of CI process to check code quality, to ensure that we're not inadvertently making common mistakes and can keep the smells and scope of code changes in line and clean. Having this step here should make future support and additions much more efficient and easy to understand.
Check duplicate code, complexity and common pitfalls. Code coverage indicator for Github README file.
checking our repo code quality.