Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
CodeceptJS vs Codeception: What are the differences?
Introduction
CodeceptJS and Codeception are two popular testing frameworks that are widely used for web application testing. While they share similar names and purposes, there are several key differences that set them apart. In this article, we will explore these differences and highlight their unique features.
Test Automation Framework: CodeceptJS is a test automation framework specifically designed for Node.js applications. It provides a simple and intuitive syntax for writing tests and supports various testing libraries and frameworks such as WebDriver, Puppeteer, and Protractor. On the other hand, Codeception is a full-stack testing framework that supports multiple programming languages, including PHP, Ruby, and Python. It offers a unified API for testing web applications using different testing libraries like Selenium, WebDriver, and REST.
Syntax and API: CodeceptJS uses a specific syntax known as Gherkin, which allows for writing tests using a natural language format. This makes the tests more readable and easier to understand, especially for non-technical stakeholders. CodeceptJS also provides a set of high-level actions called "helpers" that encapsulate complex operations and reduce the amount of code needed for test automation. In contrast, Codeception uses a more traditional code-based syntax with PHP annotations for defining test cases and actions. It provides a wide range of built-in modules that can be used to perform common testing tasks.
Extensibility and Customization: CodeceptJS offers robust extensibility options through plugins and configuration files. It allows users to easily add custom helpers, modules, and plugins to tailor the testing framework to their specific needs. Additionally, CodeceptJS supports TypeScript, enabling developers to write tests using strong type checking and modern JavaScript features. Codeception, on the other hand, provides a flexible architecture that allows users to extend the framework through custom modules and plugins. It also offers built-in support for various third-party libraries and tools, making it highly customizable.
Parallel Execution: CodeceptJS supports parallel test execution out of the box, which allows multiple tests to run simultaneously and significantly reduces the overall execution time. It achieves parallelism by running tests in separate processes, making efficient use of available system resources. Codeception, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for parallel execution. However, it provides integration with various third-party tools and services, such as Selenium Grid and Docker, which can be used to achieve parallel test execution.
Reporting and Debugging: CodeceptJS provides detailed and user-friendly test reports with screenshots and logs, making it easier to diagnose and fix issues. It also offers integrations with popular CI/CD platforms like Jenkins and CircleCI, allowing for seamless integration into the development workflow. Codeception, on the other hand, provides comprehensive test result reports with detailed information about test failures and errors. It also offers built-in debugging tools, such as step-by-step execution and interactive shell mode, for troubleshooting test failures.
Community and Ecosystem: CodeceptJS has a growing community and an active ecosystem of plugins and extensions. It has gained popularity in the JavaScript testing community due to its simplicity and modular architecture. CodeceptJS also provides extensive documentation and example projects, making it easier for new users to get started. Codeception, on the other hand, has a larger and more mature community with years of development and community-driven improvements. It has a wide range of community-built modules, plugins, and extensions, making it a popular choice for web application testing.
In Summary, CodeceptJS is a test automation framework specifically designed for Node.js applications, with a focus on simplicity and readability through its Gherkin syntax and helper functions. On the other hand, Codeception is a full-stack testing framework that supports multiple languages and offers a more traditional code-based syntax with extensive customization options and a larger community.
Pros of Codeception
- Easy to get up and running some simple tests4
Pros of CodeceptJS
- Readability10
- Full browser control9
- Cross browser support9
- Open source8
- Community6
- Flexible Driver5
- Great documentation3
- Agnostic2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Codeception
Cons of CodeceptJS
- Small community2
- Not a framework by itself1