Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Codeception

143
110
+ 1
4
CodeceptJS

103
217
+ 1
52
Add tool

CodeceptJS vs Codeception: What are the differences?

Introduction

CodeceptJS and Codeception are two popular testing frameworks that are widely used for web application testing. While they share similar names and purposes, there are several key differences that set them apart. In this article, we will explore these differences and highlight their unique features.

  1. Test Automation Framework: CodeceptJS is a test automation framework specifically designed for Node.js applications. It provides a simple and intuitive syntax for writing tests and supports various testing libraries and frameworks such as WebDriver, Puppeteer, and Protractor. On the other hand, Codeception is a full-stack testing framework that supports multiple programming languages, including PHP, Ruby, and Python. It offers a unified API for testing web applications using different testing libraries like Selenium, WebDriver, and REST.

  2. Syntax and API: CodeceptJS uses a specific syntax known as Gherkin, which allows for writing tests using a natural language format. This makes the tests more readable and easier to understand, especially for non-technical stakeholders. CodeceptJS also provides a set of high-level actions called "helpers" that encapsulate complex operations and reduce the amount of code needed for test automation. In contrast, Codeception uses a more traditional code-based syntax with PHP annotations for defining test cases and actions. It provides a wide range of built-in modules that can be used to perform common testing tasks.

  3. Extensibility and Customization: CodeceptJS offers robust extensibility options through plugins and configuration files. It allows users to easily add custom helpers, modules, and plugins to tailor the testing framework to their specific needs. Additionally, CodeceptJS supports TypeScript, enabling developers to write tests using strong type checking and modern JavaScript features. Codeception, on the other hand, provides a flexible architecture that allows users to extend the framework through custom modules and plugins. It also offers built-in support for various third-party libraries and tools, making it highly customizable.

  4. Parallel Execution: CodeceptJS supports parallel test execution out of the box, which allows multiple tests to run simultaneously and significantly reduces the overall execution time. It achieves parallelism by running tests in separate processes, making efficient use of available system resources. Codeception, on the other hand, does not have built-in support for parallel execution. However, it provides integration with various third-party tools and services, such as Selenium Grid and Docker, which can be used to achieve parallel test execution.

  5. Reporting and Debugging: CodeceptJS provides detailed and user-friendly test reports with screenshots and logs, making it easier to diagnose and fix issues. It also offers integrations with popular CI/CD platforms like Jenkins and CircleCI, allowing for seamless integration into the development workflow. Codeception, on the other hand, provides comprehensive test result reports with detailed information about test failures and errors. It also offers built-in debugging tools, such as step-by-step execution and interactive shell mode, for troubleshooting test failures.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: CodeceptJS has a growing community and an active ecosystem of plugins and extensions. It has gained popularity in the JavaScript testing community due to its simplicity and modular architecture. CodeceptJS also provides extensive documentation and example projects, making it easier for new users to get started. Codeception, on the other hand, has a larger and more mature community with years of development and community-driven improvements. It has a wide range of community-built modules, plugins, and extensions, making it a popular choice for web application testing.

In Summary, CodeceptJS is a test automation framework specifically designed for Node.js applications, with a focus on simplicity and readability through its Gherkin syntax and helper functions. On the other hand, Codeception is a full-stack testing framework that supports multiple languages and offers a more traditional code-based syntax with extensive customization options and a larger community.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Codeception
Pros of CodeceptJS
  • 4
    Easy to get up and running some simple tests
  • 10
    Readability
  • 9
    Full browser control
  • 9
    Cross browser support
  • 8
    Open source
  • 6
    Community
  • 5
    Flexible Driver
  • 3
    Great documentation
  • 2
    Agnostic

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of Codeception
Cons of CodeceptJS
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 2
      Small community
    • 1
      Not a framework by itself

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is Codeception?

    Full-stack testing framework for PHP. Run browsers tests, framework tests, APIs tests, unit tests with ease.

    What is CodeceptJS?

    It is a modern end to end testing framework with a special BDD-style syntax. The test is written as a linear scenario of user's action on a site. Each test is described inside a Scenario function with I object passed into it.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Codeception?
    What companies use CodeceptJS?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Codeception?
    What tools integrate with CodeceptJS?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Codeception and CodeceptJS?
    Selenium
    Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
    PHPUnit
    PHPUnit is a programmer-oriented testing framework for PHP. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.
    Behat
    It is an open source Behavior-Driven Development framework for PHP. It is a tool to support you in delivering software that matters through continuous communication, deliberate discovery and test-automation.
    Cypress
    Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.
    Cucumber
    Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.
    See all alternatives