CodeIgniter vs Slim

Overview

CodeIgniter

Stacks3.2K

Followers1.5K

Votes466

Slim

Stacks273

Followers391

Votes152

GitHub Stars12.2K

Forks2.0K

CodeIgniter vs Slim: What are the differences?

Key Differences between CodeIgniter and Slim

CodeIgniter and Slim are both popular PHP frameworks used for building web applications. While they share some similarities, there are key differences that set them apart. Here are six specific differences between CodeIgniter and Slim:

1. Routing Approach: CodeIgniter follows a traditional controller-based routing approach, where each URL maps to a specific controller and method. On the other hand, Slim utilizes a route-based approach, allowing developers to define routes and associated callbacks for handling requests.

2. Size and Footprint: CodeIgniter is a full-featured framework with a larger codebase and footprint compared to Slim, which focuses on being minimalistic and lightweight. Slim provides the essentials for building web applications, making it a suitable choice for small-scale projects or APIs.

3. Templating Engine: CodeIgniter includes its own templating engine called "The Parser," allowing developers to create and manage views with ease. In contrast, Slim provides no built-in templating engine, encouraging developers to use their preferred choice or opt for alternative solutions like PHP's native templating engine.

4. Database Support: CodeIgniter includes a built-in database abstraction layer, providing support for multiple database platforms, such as MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQLite. Conversely, Slim doesn't include a native database support layer, allowing developers to choose and integrate their preferred database libraries as per the project requirement.

5. Modular Structure: CodeIgniter possesses a modular-based structure, enabling developers to organize their applications into separate modules or packages. In contrast, Slim doesn't provide explicit support for modularization, although developers can implement their own modular structure using PHP namespaces or separate code directories.

6. Community and Ecosystem: CodeIgniter has a large and established community, with a wide range of plugins, libraries, and resources available for developers. Slim has a growing community with a lesser number of resources but offers extensive documentation and support for common use cases.

In summary, CodeIgniter and Slim differ in their routing approach, framework size, templating engine availability, database support, modular structure, and community/ecosystem. These differences make them suitable for different use cases, depending on the project requirements and developer preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on CodeIgniter, Slim

Ajeet

Dec 16, 2019

Needs advice

Hi, We are thinking to rebuild a website and need your suggestion on which platform to choose from NodeJs, Laravel & CodeIgnitor. Since it's an education base website and there will be multiple functionalities like the use of graphics, video, animation and off-course forms for lead generation. Please advise us which tool to use to build the website considering load-time, server security, code vulnerability, etc.

216k views216k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

CodeIgniter	Slim
CodeIgniter is a proven, agile & open PHP web application framework with a small footprint. It is powering the next generation of web apps.	Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 12.2K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 2.0K
Stacks 3.2K	Stacks 273
Followers 1.5K	Followers 391
Votes 466	Votes 152
Pros & Cons
Pros 88 Mvc 76 Easy setup 70 Open source 62 Well documented 36 Community support Cons 6 No ORM 1 No CLI	Pros 33 Microframework 27 API 22 Open source 21 Php 11 Fast
Integrations
PHP	PHP

What are some alternatives to CodeIgniter, Slim?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

CodeIgniter vs Slim: What are the differences?

Key Differences between CodeIgniter and Slim

CodeIgniter vs Slim

Overview

CodeIgniter vs Slim: What are the differences?