StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Build Automation
  4. Package Managers
  5. Composer vs Packagist

Composer vs Packagist

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Composer
Composer
Stacks1.2K
Followers559
Votes13
GitHub Stars29.2K
Forks4.7K
Packagist
Packagist
Stacks44
Followers20
Votes0
GitHub Stars1.8K
Forks479

Composer vs Packagist: What are the differences?

  1. Dependency Management: Composer is a dependency management tool for PHP, whereas Packagist is a repository for PHP packages. Composer allows developers to declare the libraries that their project depends on and manages the installation and updating of those libraries. Packagist is the default package repository for Composer, where developers can search for and find packages to include in their projects.

  2. Installation and Usage: Composer is a command-line tool that is installed globally on the developer's machine, allowing them to use it for multiple projects. It requires a composer.json file in the project directory, which defines the dependencies and version constraints for the project. On the other hand, Packagist is accessed through Composer, where developers can search for packages using the command-line tool and add them to their composer.json file.

  3. Package Management: Composer manages packages on a per-project basis, meaning that each project can have its own set of dependencies defined in its composer.json file. It installs the required packages in a vendor directory within the project, allowing for easy version control and isolation of dependencies. Packagist, on the other hand, is a centralized repository that contains packages contributed by the community, making it a one-stop-shop for PHP packages.

  4. Version Constraints: Composer allows developers to specify version constraints for the dependencies in their composer.json file using semantic versioning or other methods. This provides flexibility in choosing which versions of a package to use and ensures compatibility with the rest of the project. Packagist, being a repository of packages, also provides version information for each package, allowing developers to choose the desired version when adding the package to their project.

  5. Autoloading and Class Mapping: Composer provides autoloading functionality, which automatically loads the required classes from installed packages. It generates an autoloader file that can be included in the project, saving developers from manually including multiple files. Packagist, being a repository, does not directly handle autoloading but provides packages that are compatible with Composer's autoloading mechanism.

  6. Package Distribution and Contribution: Composer allows developers to easily distribute their packages by publishing them to Packagist. It provides a standardized format for package distribution and allows for easy management of dependencies for other developers using the package. Packagist, being a repository, facilitates the contribution of packages to the PHP community by providing a platform for developers to share their packages with others.

In Summary, Composer is a dependency management tool that allows developers to define and manage their project dependencies, while Packagist is a repository that provides a vast collection of PHP packages that can be easily included in projects using Composer.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Composer
Composer
Packagist
Packagist

It is a tool for dependency management in PHP. It allows you to declare the libraries your project depends on and it will manage (install/update) them for you.

It is the main Composer repository. It aggregates public PHP packages installable with Composer. It lets you find packages and lets Composer know where to get the code from. You can use Composer to manage your project or libraries' dependencies

Locally; Globally
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
29.2K
GitHub Stars
1.8K
GitHub Forks
4.7K
GitHub Forks
479
Stacks
1.2K
Stacks
44
Followers
559
Followers
20
Votes
13
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 7
    Must have dependency manager for PHP
  • 3
    Centralized autoload.php
  • 3
    Large number of libraries
No community feedback yet
Integrations
PhpStorm
PhpStorm
Linux
Linux
JavaScript
JavaScript
PHP
PHP
PuPHPet
PuPHPet
MySQL
MySQL
ReactPHP
ReactPHP
macOS
macOS
Redis
Redis
MySQL
MySQL

What are some alternatives to Composer, Packagist?

Meteor

Meteor

A Meteor application is a mix of JavaScript that runs inside a client web browser, JavaScript that runs on the Meteor server inside a Node.js container, and all the supporting HTML fragments, CSS rules, and static assets.

Bower

Bower

Bower is a package manager for the web. It offers a generic, unopinionated solution to the problem of front-end package management, while exposing the package dependency model via an API that can be consumed by a more opinionated build stack. There are no system wide dependencies, no dependencies are shared between different apps, and the dependency tree is flat.

Elm

Elm

Writing HTML apps is super easy with elm-lang/html. Not only does it render extremely fast, it also quietly guides you towards well-architected code.

Julia

Julia

Julia is a high-level, high-performance dynamic programming language for technical computing, with syntax that is familiar to users of other technical computing environments. It provides a sophisticated compiler, distributed parallel execution, numerical accuracy, and an extensive mathematical function library.

Racket

Racket

It is a general-purpose, multi-paradigm programming language based on the Scheme dialect of Lisp. It is designed to be a platform for programming language design and implementation. It is also used for scripting, computer science education, and research.

PureScript

PureScript

A small strongly typed programming language with expressive types that compiles to JavaScript, written in and inspired by Haskell.

pnpm

pnpm

It uses hard links and symlinks to save one version of a module only ever once on a disk. When using npm or Yarn for example, if you have 100 projects using the same version of lodash, you will have 100 copies of lodash on disk. With pnpm, lodash will be saved in a single place on the disk and a hard link will put it into the node_modules where it should be installed.

Bun

Bun

Develop, test, run, and bundle JavaScript & TypeScript projects—all with Bun. Bun is an all-in-one JavaScript runtime & toolkit designed for speed, complete with a bundler, test runner, and Node.js-compatible package manager.

Homebrew

Homebrew

Homebrew installs the stuff you need that Apple didn’t. Homebrew installs packages to their own directory and then symlinks their files into /usr/local.

fpm

fpm

It helps you build packages quickly and easily (Packages like RPM and DEB formats).

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana