StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Concourse vs Rancher

Concourse vs Rancher

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Rancher
Rancher
Stacks952
Followers1.5K
Votes644
Concourse
Concourse
Stacks254
Followers393
Votes54
GitHub Stars7.6K
Forks870

Concourse vs Rancher: What are the differences?

# Key Differences Between Concourse and Rancher

The key differences between Concourse and Rancher are as follows:

1. **Architecture**: Concourse follows a microservice architecture where each component is a separate service, while Rancher uses a monolithic architecture with all components bundled together.
2. **CI/CD Focus**: Concourse is primarily designed for Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery, offering a pipeline-centric approach, while Rancher is focused on container management and orchestration with features like Kubernetes.
3. **Container Orchestration**: Rancher provides built-in support for container orchestration tools like Kubernetes, whereas Concourse focuses more on automation and pipelines without direct orchestration capabilities.
4. **User Interface**: Rancher offers a user-friendly web interface for managing containers, clusters, and infrastructure, while Concourse has a simpler UI focused on defining and visualizing pipelines.
5. **Supported Integrations**: Concourse has integrations with popular CI/CD tools like Git, Docker, and GitHub, while Rancher integrates with various container technologies, cloud providers, and monitoring services.
6. **Community Support**: Concourse has a growing community and active development, with a focus on open-source contributions and collaboration, while Rancher has a larger user base and commercial support options available.

In Summary, the key differences between Concourse and Rancher lie in their architecture, focus areas, container orchestration support, user interfaces, integrations, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Rancher, Concourse

veera
veera

Jan 27, 2020

Needs advice

I'm planning to setup complete CD-CD setup for spark and python application which we are going to deploy in aws lambda and EMR Cluster. Which tool would be best one to choose. Since my company is trying to adopt to concourse i would like to understand what are the lack of capabilities concourse have . Thanks in advance !

521k views521k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Rancher
Rancher
Concourse
Concourse

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Concourse's principles reduce the risk of switching to and from Concourse, by encouraging practices that decouple your project from your CI's little details, and keeping all configuration in declarative files that can be checked into version control.

Manage Hosts, Deploy Containers, Monitor Resources;User Management & Collaboration;Native Docker APIs & Tools;Monitoring and Logging;Connect Containers, Manage Disks, Deploy Load Balancers;Docker App Catalog; Included Kubernetes Distribution;Included Docker Swarm Distribution; Included Mesos Distribution;Infrastructure Management
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
7.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
870
Stacks
952
Stacks
254
Followers
1.5K
Followers
393
Votes
644
Votes
54
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 103
    Easy to use
  • 79
    Open source and totally free
  • 63
    Multi-host docker-compose support
  • 58
    Load balancing and health check included
  • 58
    Simple
Cons
  • 10
    Hosting Rancher can be complicated
Pros
  • 16
    Real pipelines
  • 10
    Containerised builds
  • 9
    Flexible engine
  • 6
    Fast
  • 4
    Open source
Cons
  • 2
    Fail forward instead of rollback pattern
Integrations
Jenkins
Jenkins
Datadog
Datadog
Google Compute Engine
Google Compute Engine
Docker Compose
Docker Compose
Amazon EC2
Amazon EC2
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
GitHub
GitHub
Docker
Docker
Kubernetes
Kubernetes
Drone.io
Drone.io
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Rancher, Concourse?

Jenkins

Jenkins

In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.

Travis CI

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

TeamCity

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Drone.io

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana