StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Container Registry
  4. Container Tools
  5. Conduit vs Tutum

Conduit vs Tutum

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Tutum
Tutum
Stacks61
Followers74
Votes235
Conduit
Conduit
Stacks8
Followers18
Votes0

Conduit vs Tutum: What are the differences?

# Key Differences between Conduit and Tutum

Conduit and Tutum are both popular platforms in the cloud computing industry, each with unique features and capabilities. However, there are some key differences that set them apart. Below are the main distinctions between Conduit and Tutum.

1. **Deployment Flexibility**: Conduit offers more deployment flexibility compared to Tutum, allowing users to easily deploy and manage applications across different cloud providers and even on-premises servers. Tutum, on the other hand, is more focused on providing a streamlined deployment process within a single cloud environment.

2. **Integration Capabilities**: Conduit provides seamless integration with various third-party tools and services, making it easier for developers to incorporate existing technologies into their workflow. In contrast, Tutum has limited integration capabilities, which may restrict the flexibility and scalability of applications.

3. **Monitoring and Analytics**: Conduit offers advanced monitoring and analytics features, allowing users to track performance metrics, detect anomalies, and optimize resource utilization. Tutum, while providing basic monitoring tools, lacks the extensive analytics capabilities found in Conduit.

4. **Scalability Options**: When it comes to scalability, Conduit excels with its ability to scale applications horizontally and vertically to meet varying demands. Tutum, while supporting basic scaling options, may not offer the same level of customization and control as Conduit.

5. **Cost Management**: Conduit provides more advanced cost management tools, allowing users to optimize resource usage, identify cost-saving opportunities, and forecast expenses accurately. Tutum's cost management features are more limited, which may lead to challenges in controlling and predicting expenses.

6. **Community Support**: Conduit has a strong and active community of developers and users, offering extensive documentation, tutorials, and forums for support. Tutum, on the other hand, may have a smaller and less engaged community, which could affect the availability of resources for troubleshooting and assistance.

In Summary, the key differences between Conduit and Tutum lie in deployment flexibility, integration capabilities, monitoring and analytics features, scalability options, cost management tools, and community support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Tutum
Tutum
Conduit
Conduit

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Conduit is a lightweight open source service mesh designed for performance, power, and ease of use when running applications on Kubernetes. Conduit is incredibly fast, lightweight, fundamentally secure, and easy to get started with.

Deploy from Docker Hub; Free private Docker registry; CLI Tool; Private Links; Dynamic Links; RESTful API; Edit & Redeploy; Jumpstarts & Quickstarts; Webhooks; Bring your own node; Data volumes; Amazon Web Services; Digital Ocean; Microsoft Azure;
-
Statistics
Stacks
61
Stacks
8
Followers
74
Followers
18
Votes
235
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 35
    Awesome user interface
  • 28
    Free private docker registry
  • 24
    Its super easy
  • 24
    Docker public index integration
  • 21
    Friendly support
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Docker
Docker
MongoDB
MongoDB
MariaDB
MariaDB
MySQL
MySQL
DigitalOcean
DigitalOcean
Memcached
Memcached
RabbitMQ
RabbitMQ
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Riak
Riak
WordPress
WordPress
Kubernetes
Kubernetes

What are some alternatives to Tutum, Conduit?

Kubernetes

Kubernetes

Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.

Rancher

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Docker Compose

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

Portainer

Portainer

It is a universal container management tool. It works with Kubernetes, Docker, Docker Swarm and Azure ACI. It allows you to manage containers without needing to know platform-specific code.

Codefresh

Codefresh

Automate and parallelize testing. Codefresh allows teams to spin up on-demand compositions to run unit and integration tests as part of the continuous integration process. Jenkins integration allows more complex pipelines.

CAST.AI

CAST.AI

It is an AI-driven cloud optimization platform for Kubernetes. Instantly cut your cloud bill, prevent downtime, and 10X the power of DevOps.

k3s

k3s

Certified Kubernetes distribution designed for production workloads in unattended, resource-constrained, remote locations or inside IoT appliances. Supports something as small as a Raspberry Pi or as large as an AWS a1.4xlarge 32GiB server.

Flocker

Flocker

Flocker is a data volume manager and multi-host Docker cluster management tool. With it you can control your data using the same tools you use for your stateless applications. This means that you can run your databases, queues and key-value stores in Docker and move them around as easily as the rest of your app.

Kitematic

Kitematic

Simple Docker App management for Mac OS X

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana