StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Utilities
  3. Background Jobs
  4. Message Queue
  5. Confluent vs StreamSets

Confluent vs StreamSets

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Confluent
Confluent
Stacks337
Followers239
Votes14
StreamSets
StreamSets
Stacks53
Followers133
Votes0

Confluent vs StreamSets: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Confluent and StreamSets are both popular data integration tools used in the field of data engineering and analytics. They have their own unique features and capabilities that make them suitable for different use cases.

  1. Architecture: Confluent is based on Apache Kafka, providing a platform for real-time data streaming and processing. On the other hand, StreamSets is a data integration platform that enables the creation of data pipelines for ingesting, processing, and analyzing data from various sources.

  2. Focus: Confluent focuses primarily on real-time data streaming and processing capabilities, making it a preferred choice for scenarios where low latency data processing is crucial. StreamSets, on the other hand, is more focused on data integration and building data pipelines for data movement and transformation.

  3. Integration with other systems: Confluent is tightly integrated with Apache Kafka ecosystem, offering seamless interoperability with tools like Kafka Connect and Kafka Streams. Whereas StreamSets offers connectors for a wide range of data sources, including databases, cloud services, and analytics platforms, providing a more versatile integration approach.

  4. Development ease: Confluent provides a developer-friendly platform through Confluent Hub and Confluent Cloud, offering a seamless experience for deploying and managing data pipelines. StreamSets, on the other hand, focuses on providing a visual drag-and-drop interface for building data pipelines, making it easier for users without extensive coding experience.

  5. Scalability: Confluent provides scalability through the distributed architecture of Apache Kafka, allowing users to handle large volumes of data and high throughput. StreamSets also offers scalability by enabling users to execute data pipelines in parallel and distribute workloads across multiple nodes for efficient processing.

  6. Community and Support: Confluent benefits from a strong community around Apache Kafka, providing users with a wealth of resources, tutorials, and community support. StreamSets offers commercial support and services to its users, ensuring timely assistance and guidance for deploying and managing data pipelines effectively.

In Summary, Confluent and StreamSets differ in their architecture, focus, integration capabilities, development ease, scalability, and community support, making them suitable for different use cases in data engineering and analytics.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Confluent
Confluent
StreamSets
StreamSets

It is a data streaming platform based on Apache Kafka: a full-scale streaming platform, capable of not only publish-and-subscribe, but also the storage and processing of data within the stream

An end-to-end data integration platform to build, run, monitor and manage smart data pipelines that deliver continuous data for DataOps.

Reliable; High-performance stream data platform; Manage and organize data from different sources.
Only StreamSets provides a single design experience for all design patterns (batch, streaming, CDC, ETL, ELT, and ML pipelines) for 10x greater developer productivity; smart data pipelines that are resilient to change for 80% less breakages; and a single pane of glass for managing and monitoring all pipelines across hybrid and cloud architectures to eliminate blind spots and control gaps.
Statistics
Stacks
337
Stacks
53
Followers
239
Followers
133
Votes
14
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Free for casual use
  • 3
    Dashboard for kafka insight
  • 3
    No hypercloud lock-in
  • 2
    Zero devops
  • 2
    Easily scalable
Cons
  • 1
    Proprietary
Cons
  • 2
    No user community
  • 1
    Crashes
Integrations
Microsoft SharePoint
Microsoft SharePoint
Java
Java
Python
Python
Salesforce Sales Cloud
Salesforce Sales Cloud
Kafka Streams
Kafka Streams
HBase
HBase
Databricks
Databricks
Amazon Redshift
Amazon Redshift
MySQL
MySQL
gRPC
gRPC
Google BigQuery
Google BigQuery
Amazon Kinesis
Amazon Kinesis
Cassandra
Cassandra
Hadoop
Hadoop
Redis
Redis

What are some alternatives to Confluent, StreamSets?

Kafka

Kafka

Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ

RabbitMQ gives your applications a common platform to send and receive messages, and your messages a safe place to live until received.

Celery

Celery

Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.

Amazon SQS

Amazon SQS

Transmit any volume of data, at any level of throughput, without losing messages or requiring other services to be always available. With SQS, you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available messaging cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

NSQ

NSQ

NSQ is a realtime distributed messaging platform designed to operate at scale, handling billions of messages per day. It promotes distributed and decentralized topologies without single points of failure, enabling fault tolerance and high availability coupled with a reliable message delivery guarantee. See features & guarantees.

Apache Spark

Apache Spark

Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.

ActiveMQ

ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License.

ZeroMQ

ZeroMQ

The 0MQ lightweight messaging kernel is a library which extends the standard socket interfaces with features traditionally provided by specialised messaging middleware products. 0MQ sockets provide an abstraction of asynchronous message queues, multiple messaging patterns, message filtering (subscriptions), seamless access to multiple transport protocols and more.

Presto

Presto

Distributed SQL Query Engine for Big Data

Apache NiFi

Apache NiFi

An easy to use, powerful, and reliable system to process and distribute data. It supports powerful and scalable directed graphs of data routing, transformation, and system mediation logic.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase