Consul vs zetcd: What are the differences?
Developers describe Consul as "A tool for service discovery, monitoring and configuration". Consul is a tool for service discovery and configuration. Consul is distributed, highly available, and extremely scalable. On the other hand, zetcd is detailed as "Serve the Apache Zookeeper API but back it with an etcd cluster". A ZooKeeper "personality" for etcd. Point a ZooKeeper client at zetcd to dispatch the operations on an etcd cluster. Protocol encoding and decoding heavily based on go-zookeeper.
Consul and zetcd can be primarily classified as "Open Source Service Discovery" tools.
Consul and zetcd are both open source tools. It seems that Consul with 16.4K GitHub stars and 2.85K forks on GitHub has more adoption than zetcd with 886 GitHub stars and 58 GitHub forks.
What is Consul?
What is zetcd?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Why do developers choose zetcd?
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Consul?
What are the cons of using zetcd?
What companies use zetcd?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
All our services use Consul for discovery, configuration and cluster management (auto scaling, health monitoring, dynamic reconfiguration, leader elections)