Convox vs Kubernetes

Overview

Kubernetes

Stacks61.2K

Followers52.8K

Votes685

Convox

Stacks42

Followers55

Votes37

Convox vs Kubernetes: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Convox and Kubernetes

Convox and Kubernetes are both popular container orchestration platforms, but they have some key differences in terms of architecture, usage, and deployment flexibility. The following are the main differences between Convox and Kubernetes:

Architecture: Convox follows a simpler architecture design compared to Kubernetes. Convox has a single controller and multiple agents, while Kubernetes has a more complex architecture with multiple master and worker nodes. This simplicity in Convox's architecture makes it easier to configure and manage.
Ease of Use: Convox is known for its simplicity and user-friendly interface. It provides a high-level abstraction and automates many tasks, making it easier for developers to deploy and manage their applications. On the other hand, Kubernetes has a steeper learning curve and requires more manual configuration, making it more suitable for advanced users or experienced DevOps teams.
Deployment Flexibility: Convox primarily focuses on deploying applications in the cloud, especially on AWS. It provides seamless integration with AWS services and simplifies cloud-native app development. On the other hand, Kubernetes is a platform-agnostic solution that can be deployed on various cloud providers and even on-premises infrastructure. Kubernetes offers more deployment flexibility and portability.
Scaling: Convox automatically scales the application based on resource usage and demand. It provides horizontal scaling by adding or removing instances as needed. In contrast, Kubernetes offers more advanced scaling capabilities, such as vertical scaling, which allows scaling individual pods by allocating more resources. Kubernetes also provides fine-grained control over scaling policies and strategies.
Community and Ecosystem: Kubernetes has a larger and more active community, which means more resources, documentation, and community support. Kubernetes also has a vast ecosystem of third-party tools and plugins, providing a wide range of options for integration and customization. Convox, although it has a smaller community, has a strong focus on simplicity and ease of use, which can be appealing to certain developers or organizations.
Cost Considerations: Convox is primarily built around AWS services and utilizes AWS resources for deployment. While this can provide seamless integration and ease of use for AWS users, it may also lead to higher costs, especially when using certain AWS services. Kubernetes, being platform-agnostic, allows more flexibility in choosing infrastructure options and can potentially provide cost optimization opportunities.

In Summary, Convox offers a simpler architecture, ease of use, and seamless integration with AWS, making it a good choice for developers focusing on cloud-native app development on AWS. On the other hand, Kubernetes provides a more flexible and scalable solution with a larger community and ecosystem, making it suitable for various deployment scenarios and infrastructure choices.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Kubernetes, Convox

Simon

Senior Fullstack Developer at QUANTUSflow Software GmbH

Apr 27, 2020

Decidedon

GitHub

GitHub Pages

Markdown

Our whole DevOps stack consists of the following tools:

@{GitHub}|tool:27| (incl. @{GitHub Pages}|tool:683|/@{Markdown}|tool:1147| for Documentation, GettingStarted and HowTo's) for collaborative review and code management tool
Respectively @{Git}|tool:1046| as revision control system
@{SourceTree}|tool:1599| as @{Git}|tool:1046| GUI
@{Visual Studio Code}|tool:4202| as IDE
@{CircleCI}|tool:190| for continuous integration (automatize development process)
@{Prettier}|tool:7035| / @{TSLint}|tool:5561| / @{ESLint}|tool:3337| as code linter
@{SonarQube}|tool:2638| as quality gate
@{Docker}|tool:586| as container management (incl. @{Docker Compose}|tool:3136| for multi-container application management)
@{VirtualBox}|tool:774| for operating system simulation tests
@{Kubernetes}|tool:1885| as cluster management for docker containers
@{Heroku}|tool:133| for deploying in test environments
@{nginx}|tool:1052| as web server (preferably used as facade server in production environment)
@{SSLMate}|tool:2752| (using @{OpenSSL}|tool:3091|) for certificate management
@{Amazon EC2}|tool:18| (incl. @{Amazon S3}|tool:25|) for deploying in stage (production-like) and production environments
@{PostgreSQL}|tool:1028| as preferred database system
@{Redis}|tool:1031| as preferred in-memory database/store (great for caching)

The main reason we have chosen Kubernetes over Docker Swarm is related to the following artifacts:

Key features: Easy and flexible installation, Clear dashboard, Great scaling operations, Monitoring is an integral part, Great load balancing concepts, Monitors the condition and ensures compensation in the event of failure.
Applications: An application can be deployed using a combination of pods, deployments, and services (or micro-services).
Functionality: Kubernetes as a complex installation and setup process, but it not as limited as Docker Swarm.
Monitoring: It supports multiple versions of logging and monitoring when the services are deployed within the cluster (Elasticsearch/Kibana (ELK), Heapster/Grafana, Sysdig cloud integration).
Scalability: All-in-one framework for distributed systems.
Other Benefits: Kubernetes is backed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF), huge community among container orchestration tools, it is an open source and modular tool that works with any OS.

12.8M views12.8M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Kubernetes	Convox
Kubernetes is an open source orchestration system for Docker containers. It handles scheduling onto nodes in a compute cluster and actively manages workloads to ensure that their state matches the users declared intentions.	Convox is an open source Platform as a Service that runs in your own Amazon Web Services (AWS) account. Instead of signing up for a multi-tenant PaaS like Heroku, you can have your own. This gives you privacy and control over your platform and avoids the substantial markup on AWS prices that other platforms charge.
Lightweight, simple and accessible;Built for a multi-cloud world, public, private or hybrid;Highly modular, designed so that all of its components are easily swappable	Instant Deploys;Runs in your AWS account;Open Source;Container Management; Kubernetes
Statistics
Stacks 61.2K	Stacks 42
Followers 52.8K	Followers 55
Votes 685	Votes 37
Pros & Cons
Pros 166 Leading docker container management solution 130 Simple and powerful 108 Open source 76 Backed by google 58 The right abstractions Cons 16 Steep learning curve 15 Poor workflow for development 8 Orchestrates only infrastructure 4 High resource requirements for on-prem clusters 2 Too heavy for simple systems	Pros 7 Your own scalable Heroku in 5 minutes 7 It makes deployment management to AWS dependable. 6 Free, you only pay for AWS resources 5 Built on Docker 5 Convox deploy - deploys your app in one command
Integrations
Vagrant Docker Rackspace Cloud Servers Microsoft Azure Google Compute Engine Ansible Google Kubernetes Engine	GitLab Slack CircleCI Travis CI GitHub Docker Amazon EKS Amazon VPC Datadog Amazon EC2 Container Service

What are some alternatives to Kubernetes, Convox?

Heroku

Heroku is a cloud application platform – a new way of building and deploying web apps. Heroku lets app developers spend 100% of their time on their application code, not managing servers, deployment, ongoing operations, or scaling.

Clever Cloud

Clever Cloud is a polyglot cloud application platform. The service helps developers to build applications with many languages and services, with auto-scaling features and a true pay-as-you-go pricing model.

Rancher

Rancher is an open source container management platform that includes full distributions of Kubernetes, Apache Mesos and Docker Swarm, and makes it simple to operate container clusters on any cloud or infrastructure platform.

Google App Engine

Google has a reputation for highly reliable, high performance infrastructure. With App Engine you can take advantage of the 10 years of knowledge Google has in running massively scalable, performance driven systems. App Engine applications are easy to build, easy to maintain, and easy to scale as your traffic and data storage needs grow.

Red Hat OpenShift

OpenShift is Red Hat's Cloud Computing Platform as a Service (PaaS) offering. OpenShift is an application platform in the cloud where application developers and teams can build, test, deploy, and run their applications.

Docker Compose

With Compose, you define a multi-container application in a single file, then spin your application up in a single command which does everything that needs to be done to get it running.

Docker Swarm

Swarm serves the standard Docker API, so any tool which already communicates with a Docker daemon can use Swarm to transparently scale to multiple hosts: Dokku, Compose, Krane, Deis, DockerUI, Shipyard, Drone, Jenkins... and, of course, the Docker client itself.

AWS Elastic Beanstalk

Once you upload your application, Elastic Beanstalk automatically handles the deployment details of capacity provisioning, load balancing, auto-scaling, and application health monitoring.

Tutum

Tutum lets developers easily manage and run lightweight, portable, self-sufficient containers from any application. AWS-like control, Heroku-like ease. The same container that a developer builds and tests on a laptop can run at scale in Tutum.

Render

Render is a unified platform to build and run all your apps and websites with free SSL, a global CDN, private networks and auto deploys from Git.

Related Comparisons

Convox vs Kubernetes: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Convox and Kubernetes

Architecture: Convox follows a simpler architecture design compared to Kubernetes. Convox has a single controller and multiple agents, while Kubernetes has a more complex architecture with multiple master and worker nodes. This simplicity in Convox's architecture makes it easier to configure and manage.
Ease of Use: Convox is known for its simplicity and user-friendly interface. It provides a high-level abstraction and automates many tasks, making it easier for developers to deploy and manage their applications. On the other hand, Kubernetes has a steeper learning curve and requires more manual configuration, making it more suitable for advanced users or experienced DevOps teams.
Deployment Flexibility: Convox primarily focuses on deploying applications in the cloud, especially on AWS. It provides seamless integration with AWS services and simplifies cloud-native app development. On the other hand, Kubernetes is a platform-agnostic solution that can be deployed on various cloud providers and even on-premises infrastructure. Kubernetes offers more deployment flexibility and portability.
Scaling: Convox automatically scales the application based on resource usage and demand. It provides horizontal scaling by adding or removing instances as needed. In contrast, Kubernetes offers more advanced scaling capabilities, such as vertical scaling, which allows scaling individual pods by allocating more resources. Kubernetes also provides fine-grained control over scaling policies and strategies.
Community and Ecosystem: Kubernetes has a larger and more active community, which means more resources, documentation, and community support. Kubernetes also has a vast ecosystem of third-party tools and plugins, providing a wide range of options for integration and customization. Convox, although it has a smaller community, has a strong focus on simplicity and ease of use, which can be appealing to certain developers or organizations.
Cost Considerations: Convox is primarily built around AWS services and utilizes AWS resources for deployment. While this can provide seamless integration and ease of use for AWS users, it may also lead to higher costs, especially when using certain AWS services. Kubernetes, being platform-agnostic, allows more flexibility in choosing infrastructure options and can potentially provide cost optimization opportunities.

Convox vs Kubernetes

Overview

Convox vs Kubernetes: What are the differences?