CotEditor vs Sublime Text

Overview

Sublime Text

Stacks33.8K

Followers27.8K

Votes4.0K

CotEditor

Stacks13

Followers24

Votes3

GitHub Stars7.3K

Forks465

CotEditor vs Sublime Text: What are the differences?

Comparison of CotEditor and Sublime Text

CotEditor and Sublime Text are both popular text editors used by programmers and developers. While they share some similarities in terms of functionality, there are key differences that set them apart.

Language Support: CotEditor primarily focuses on providing excellent support for macOS and its native programming languages. On the other hand, Sublime Text offers a broader range of language support, including additional plugins and packages for different languages and frameworks.
Customizability: Sublime Text is known for its highly customizable interface, allowing users to personalize their editor to their specific needs. CotEditor, while it does have some customization options, is not as flexible or extensive in terms of customization compared to Sublime Text.
License and Pricing: CotEditor is an open-source software and is available for free, making it an attractive option for those on a limited budget. Sublime Text, however, is a proprietary software and requires a paid license after the evaluation period.
Performance and Speed: Sublime Text is renowned for its fast and responsive performance, even when handling large files or projects. CotEditor, although it performs reasonably well, may exhibit some slowdowns when dealing with complex or extensive codebases.
Plugin Ecosystem: Sublime Text has a vast and active community of developers who continue to create and maintain a wide range of plugins, enhancing the functionality of the editor. In contrast, CotEditor's plugin ecosystem is not as extensive or diverse as Sublime Text, limiting the availability of additional features and extensions.
Cross-Platform Compatibility: Sublime Text is compatible with multiple operating systems, including macOS, Windows, and Linux. CotEditor, however, is primarily designed for macOS and may not offer the same level of compatibility or feature parity on other platforms.

In summary, Sublime Text offers broader language support, extensive customization options, and a thriving plugin ecosystem, making it a popular choice for programmers. CotEditor, on the other hand, excels in macOS integration and is a free and lightweight option. Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on the user's specific needs and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Sublime Text, CotEditor

Kamaleshwar

Software Engineer at Dibiz Pte. Ltd.

Jul 8, 2020

Decided

Visual Studio Code became famous over the past 3+ years I believe. The clean UI, easy to use UX and the plethora of integrations made it a very easy decision for us. Our gripe with Sublime was probably only the UX side. VSCode has not failed us till now, and still is able to support our development env without any significant effort.

Goland being paid, as well as built only for Go seemed like a significant limitation to not consider it.

1.36M views1.36M

Comments

410-Ventures

Nov 18, 2020

Review

PyCharm (pro)

great editor designed specifically for Python and python apps
complex (good for configurability, bad for simplicity)
expensive ($200 first year, $120 third year)

PyCharm (free)

same as above but without a REST client or support for other web development tools (which you will likely end up using)
ok to get your feet wet (you can always upgrade later) Full comparison: https://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/features/editions_comparison_matrix.html

VS Code (free)

Configurable "IDE" with support for most modern languages
TONS of simple-to-install extensions that add functionality
Great docs and UI

Sublime Text (free)

one of the most minimal editors out there
it just works

It's really down to personal preference. But I would recommend downloading all of the FREE editors, getting setup in each, and keeping only the ones you like.

My personal choice for web development is VS Code but I started with Pycharm (free), and use Sublime text on occasion.

Just focus on learning and developing and you will find what features you're looking for.

12.1k views12.1k

Comments

Andrey

Managing Partner at WhiteLabelDevelopers

May 18, 2020

Decided

Since communication with Github is not necessary, the Atom is less convenient in working with text and code. Sublim's support and understanding of projects is best for us. Notepad for us is a completely outdated solution with an unacceptable interface. We use a good theme for Sublim ayu-dark

539k views539k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Sublime Text	CotEditor
Sublime Text is available for OS X, Windows and Linux. One license is all you need to use Sublime Text on every computer you own, no matter what operating system it uses. Sublime Text uses a custom UI toolkit, optimized for speed and beauty, while taking advantage of native functionality on each platform.	CotEditor is a lightweight plain-text editor for OS X.
Goto Anything;Multiple Selections;Command Palette;Distraction Free Mode;Split Editing;Instant Project Switch;Plugin API;Customize Anything;Cross Platform	Syntax Highlighting;Powerful Find & Replace;Setting via Click;Outline Menu;Split View;Character Inspector;Scriptable;Incompatible Characters;CJK Language Friendly
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 7.3K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 465
Stacks 33.8K	Stacks 13
Followers 27.8K	Followers 24
Votes 4.0K	Votes 3
Pros & Cons
Pros 720 Lightweight 652 Plugins 641 Super fast 468 Great code editor 442 Cross platform Cons 8 Steep learning curve 7 Everything 4 Number of plugins doing the same thing 4 Doesn't act like a Mac app 4 Flexibility to move file	Pros 3 Excellent support for Japanese encoding
Integrations
Linux macOS Windows	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Sublime Text, CotEditor?

Atom

At GitHub, we're building the text editor we've always wanted. A tool you can customize to do anything, but also use productively on the first day without ever touching a config file. Atom is modern, approachable, and hackable to the core. We can't wait to see what you build with it.

Vim

Vim is an advanced text editor that seeks to provide the power of the de-facto Unix editor 'Vi', with a more complete feature set. Vim is a highly configurable text editor built to enable efficient text editing. It is an improved version of the vi editor distributed with most UNIX systems. Vim is distributed free as charityware.

Visual Studio Code

Build and debug modern web and cloud applications. Code is free and available on your favorite platform - Linux, Mac OSX, and Windows.

Notepad++

Notepad++ is a free (as in "free speech" and also as in "free beer") source code editor and Notepad replacement that supports several languages. Running in the MS Windows environment, its use is governed by GPL License.

Emacs

GNU Emacs is an extensible, customizable text editor—and more. At its core is an interpreter for Emacs Lisp, a dialect of the Lisp programming language with extensions to support text editing.

Brackets

With focused visual tools and preprocessor support, it is a modern text editor that makes it easy to design in the browser.

Neovim

Neovim is a project that seeks to aggressively refactor Vim in order to: simplify maintenance and encourage contributions, split the work between multiple developers, enable the implementation of new/modern user interfaces without any modifications to the core source, and improve extensibility with a new plugin architecture.

VSCodium

It is a community-driven, freely-licensed binary distribution of Microsoft’s editor VSCode.

TextMate

TextMate brings Apple's approach to operating systems into the world of text editors. By bridging UNIX underpinnings and GUI, TextMate cherry-picks the best of both worlds to the benefit of expert scripters and novice users alike.

gedit

gedit is the GNOME text editor. While aiming at simplicity and ease of use, gedit is a powerful general purpose text editor.

Related Comparisons

CotEditor vs Sublime Text: What are the differences?

Comparison of CotEditor and Sublime Text

Language Support: CotEditor primarily focuses on providing excellent support for macOS and its native programming languages. On the other hand, Sublime Text offers a broader range of language support, including additional plugins and packages for different languages and frameworks.
Customizability: Sublime Text is known for its highly customizable interface, allowing users to personalize their editor to their specific needs. CotEditor, while it does have some customization options, is not as flexible or extensive in terms of customization compared to Sublime Text.
License and Pricing: CotEditor is an open-source software and is available for free, making it an attractive option for those on a limited budget. Sublime Text, however, is a proprietary software and requires a paid license after the evaluation period.
Performance and Speed: Sublime Text is renowned for its fast and responsive performance, even when handling large files or projects. CotEditor, although it performs reasonably well, may exhibit some slowdowns when dealing with complex or extensive codebases.
Plugin Ecosystem: Sublime Text has a vast and active community of developers who continue to create and maintain a wide range of plugins, enhancing the functionality of the editor. In contrast, CotEditor's plugin ecosystem is not as extensive or diverse as Sublime Text, limiting the availability of additional features and extensions.
Cross-Platform Compatibility: Sublime Text is compatible with multiple operating systems, including macOS, Windows, and Linux. CotEditor, however, is primarily designed for macOS and may not offer the same level of compatibility or feature parity on other platforms.

CotEditor vs Sublime Text

Overview

CotEditor vs Sublime Text: What are the differences?