Coveralls vs Jenkins

Overview

Jenkins

Stacks59.2K

Followers50.4K

Votes2.2K

GitHub Stars24.6K

Forks9.2K

Coveralls

Stacks1.7K

Followers278

Votes68

Coveralls vs Jenkins: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown presents key differences between Coveralls and Jenkins.

Deployment Process Automation: Jenkins is primarily a continuous integration and automation tool that is used to automate building, testing, and deploying software. Coveralls, on the other hand, is a code coverage tool that focuses on providing insights into the code coverage of software projects. While Jenkins can facilitate deployment as part of the CI/CD pipeline, Coveralls does not offer deployment automation capabilities.
Code Coverage Focus: Coveralls specializes in code coverage analysis, offering detailed reports on how much of the code base is covered by tests. Jenkins, on the other hand, can be integrated with code coverage tools like Cobertura and JaCoCo to generate coverage reports but does not provide in-depth code coverage analysis natively like Coveralls does.
User Interface: Jenkins has a user-friendly web-based interface that allows users to configure and manage their automation pipelines easily. Coveralls also offers a web interface to view code coverage reports and insights, but its primary focus is on providing code coverage metrics rather than automation pipeline configuration and management like Jenkins.
Community Support and Plugins: Jenkins has a vast community and a wide range of plugins available in its ecosystem, enabling users to extend its functionality and integrate with various tools and services. Coveralls, being more specialized in code coverage analysis, may not have as extensive plugin support or a large community compared to Jenkins.
Integrations: Jenkins can be easily integrated with various version control systems like Git, Bitbucket, and SVN, as well as other tools such as Jira and Slack. Coveralls, while providing integrations with popular platforms like GitHub, focuses more on code coverage integrations than a wide array of integrations across different stages of the development pipeline.
Pricing Model: Jenkins is an open-source tool that is free to use and highly customizable, making it cost-effective for organizations. Coveralls, on the other hand, offers both free and paid plans based on the number of repositories and the level of code coverage insights required, which may impact the cost of using the tool compared to Jenkins.

In Summary, Jenkins and Coveralls differ in deployment automation capabilities, code coverage focus, user interface, community support, integrations, and pricing model.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Jenkins, Coveralls

Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceon

Azure Pipelines

.NET

Jenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k

Comments

Felipe

May 24, 2020

Needs advice

My website is brand new and one of the few requirements of testings I had to implement was code coverage. Never though it was so hard to implement using a #docker container.
Given my lack of experience, every attempt I tried on making a simple code coverage test using the 4 combinations of #TravisCI, #CircleCi with #Coveralls, #Codecov I failed. The main problem was I was generating the .coverage file within the docker container and couldn't access it with #TravisCi or #CircleCi, every attempt to solve this problem seems to be very hacky and this was not the kind of complexity I want to introduce to my newborn website.
This problem was solved using a specific action for #GitHubActions, it was a 3 line solution I had to put in my github workflow file and I was able to access the .coverage file from my docker container and get the coverage report with #Codecov.

198k views198k

Comments

StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

529k views529k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins	Coveralls
In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.	Coveralls works with your CI server and sifts through your coverage data to find issues you didn't even know you had before they become a problem. Free for open source, pro accounts for private repos, instant sign up with GitHub OAuth.
Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support	Repository Coverage Statistics;Individual File Coverage Reports;Line By Line Coverage;Repository Overview
Statistics
GitHub Stars 24.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 9.2K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 59.2K	Stacks 1.7K
Followers 50.4K	Followers 278
Votes 2.2K	Votes 68
Pros & Cons
Pros 523 Hosted internally 469 Free open source 318 Great to build, deploy or launch anything async 243 Tons of integrations 211 Rich set of plugins with good documentation Cons 13 Workarounds needed for basic requirements 10 Groovy with cumbersome syntax 8 Plugins compatibility issues 7 Lack of support 7 Limited abilities with declarative pipelines	Pros 45 Free for public repositories 13 Code coverage 7 Ease of integration 2 More stable than Codecov 1 Combines coverage from multiple/parallel test runs
Integrations
No integrations available	Travis CI CircleCI Semaphore Codeship

What are some alternatives to Jenkins, Coveralls?

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Shippable

Shippable is a SaaS platform that lets you easily add Continuous Integration/Deployment to your Github and BitBucket repositories. It is lightweight, super simple to setup, and runs your builds and tests faster than any other service.

Buildkite

CI and build automation tool that combines the power of your own build infrastructure with the convenience of a managed, centralized web UI. Used by Shopify, Basecamp, Digital Ocean, Venmo, Cochlear, Bugsnag and more.

Codecov

Our patrons rave about our elegant coverage reports, integrated pull request comments, interactive commit graphs, our Chrome plugin and security.

Related Comparisons

Coveralls vs Jenkins: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown presents key differences between Coveralls and Jenkins.

Deployment Process Automation: Jenkins is primarily a continuous integration and automation tool that is used to automate building, testing, and deploying software. Coveralls, on the other hand, is a code coverage tool that focuses on providing insights into the code coverage of software projects. While Jenkins can facilitate deployment as part of the CI/CD pipeline, Coveralls does not offer deployment automation capabilities.
Code Coverage Focus: Coveralls specializes in code coverage analysis, offering detailed reports on how much of the code base is covered by tests. Jenkins, on the other hand, can be integrated with code coverage tools like Cobertura and JaCoCo to generate coverage reports but does not provide in-depth code coverage analysis natively like Coveralls does.
User Interface: Jenkins has a user-friendly web-based interface that allows users to configure and manage their automation pipelines easily. Coveralls also offers a web interface to view code coverage reports and insights, but its primary focus is on providing code coverage metrics rather than automation pipeline configuration and management like Jenkins.
Community Support and Plugins: Jenkins has a vast community and a wide range of plugins available in its ecosystem, enabling users to extend its functionality and integrate with various tools and services. Coveralls, being more specialized in code coverage analysis, may not have as extensive plugin support or a large community compared to Jenkins.
Integrations: Jenkins can be easily integrated with various version control systems like Git, Bitbucket, and SVN, as well as other tools such as Jira and Slack. Coveralls, while providing integrations with popular platforms like GitHub, focuses more on code coverage integrations than a wide array of integrations across different stages of the development pipeline.
Pricing Model: Jenkins is an open-source tool that is free to use and highly customizable, making it cost-effective for organizations. Coveralls, on the other hand, offers both free and paid plans based on the number of repositories and the level of code coverage insights required, which may impact the cost of using the tool compared to Jenkins.

In Summary, Jenkins and Coveralls differ in deployment automation capabilities, code coverage focus, user interface, community support, integrations, and pricing model.

Coveralls vs Jenkins

Overview

Coveralls vs Jenkins: What are the differences?