Coverity Scan vs Jenkins

Overview

Jenkins

Stacks59.2K

Followers50.4K

Votes2.2K

GitHub Stars24.6K

Forks9.2K

Coverity Scan

Stacks50

Followers185

Votes0

Coverity Scan vs Jenkins: What are the differences?

## Key Differences between Coverity Scan and Jenkins

Coverity Scan is a static code analysis tool used for identifying security vulnerabilities and quality defects in code by scanning the source code. Jenkins, on the other hand, is an automation server that is used for continuous integration and continuous delivery of software projects.

1. **Purpose**: Coverity Scan focuses solely on static code analysis to identify defects and vulnerabilities in the codebase, while Jenkins is primarily used for automating the build, test, and deployment processes of software projects.

2. **Integration**: Coverity Scan is typically integrated into the software development lifecycle as a standalone tool for code analysis, whereas Jenkins can be integrated with various tools and plugins to support different stages of the software development process.

3. **Workflow Automation**: Jenkins provides a more comprehensive automation platform with support for building, testing, and deploying software, while Coverity Scan is limited to static code analysis and does not offer the same level of automation capabilities.

4. **Real-time Feedback**: Coverity Scan is designed to provide developers with immediate feedback on code quality and security issues during the development phase, whereas Jenkins focuses more on automating the build and deployment processes without real-time code analysis.

5. **Scalability**: Jenkins is known for its ability to scale and support large, complex software projects with multiple teams, while Coverity Scan is more suitable for smaller teams or individual developers working on specific codebases.

6. **Customization**: Jenkins offers a high level of customization through its extensive plugin ecosystem, allowing users to tailor the automation process to their specific requirements, while Coverity Scan has more limited customization options due to its focus on static code analysis.

In Summary, Coverity Scan and Jenkins differ in their purpose, integration, workflow automation, real-time feedback, scalability, and customization options for software development projects.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Jenkins, Coverity Scan

Balaramesh

Apr 20, 2020

Needs adviceon

Azure Pipelines

.NET

Jenkins

We are currently using Azure Pipelines for continous integration. Our applications are developed witn .NET framework. But when we look at the online Jenkins is the most widely used tool for continous integration. Can you please give me the advice which one is best to use for my case Azure pipeline or jenkins.

663k views663k

Comments

StackShare

Apr 17, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "Currently we use Travis CI and have optimized it as much as we can so our builds are fairly quick. Our boss is all about redundancy so we are looking for another solution to fall back on in case Travis goes down and/or jacks prices way up (they were recently acquired). Could someone recommend which CI we should go with and if they have time, an explanation of how they're different?"

530k views530k

Comments

Tatiana

Nov 16, 2019

Decided

Jenkins is a pretty flexible, complete tool. Especially I love the possibility to configure jobs as a code with Jenkins pipelines.

CircleCI is well suited for small projects where the main task is to run continuous integration as quickly as possible. Travis CI is recommended primarily for open-source projects that need to be tested in different environments.

And for something a bit larger I prefer to use Jenkins because it is possible to make serious system configuration thereby different plugins. In Jenkins, I can change almost anything. But if you want to start the CI chain as soon as possible, Jenkins may not be the right choice.

734k views734k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jenkins	Coverity Scan
In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.	Coverity's implementation of static analysis can follow all the possible paths of execution through source code (including interprocedurally) and find defects and vulnerabilities caused by the conjunction of statements that are not errors independent of each other.
Easy installation;Easy configuration;Change set support;Permanent links;RSS/E-mail/IM Integration;After-the-fact tagging;JUnit/TestNG test reporting;Distributed builds;File fingerprinting;Plugin Support	Test every line of code and potential execution path.;The root cause of each defect is clearly explained, making it easy to fix bugs;Integrates with GitHub and Travis CI
Statistics
GitHub Stars 24.6K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 9.2K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 59.2K	Stacks 50
Followers 50.4K	Followers 185
Votes 2.2K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 523 Hosted internally 469 Free open source 318 Great to build, deploy or launch anything async 243 Tons of integrations 211 Rich set of plugins with good documentation Cons 13 Workarounds needed for basic requirements 10 Groovy with cumbersome syntax 8 Plugins compatibility issues 7 Lack of support 7 Limited abilities with declarative pipelines	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	GitHub Travis CI

What are some alternatives to Jenkins, Coverity Scan?

Travis CI

Free for open source projects, our CI environment provides multiple runtimes (e.g. Node.js or PHP versions), data stores and so on. Because of this, hosting your project on travis-ci.com means you can effortlessly test your library or applications against multiple runtimes and data stores without even having all of them installed locally.

Codeship

Codeship runs your automated tests and configured deployment when you push to your repository. It takes care of managing and scaling the infrastructure so that you are able to test and release more frequently and get faster feedback for building the product your users need.

CircleCI

Continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. Offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp.

TeamCity

TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects.

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Drone.io

Drone is a hosted continuous integration service. It enables you to conveniently set up projects to automatically build, test, and deploy as you make changes to your code. Drone integrates seamlessly with Github, Bitbucket and Google Code as well as third party services such as Heroku, Dotcloud, Google AppEngine and more.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

wercker

Wercker is a CI/CD developer automation platform designed for Microservices & Container Architecture.

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server created by ThoughtWorks. GoCD offers business a first-class build and deployment engine for complete control and visibility.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Related Comparisons

Coverity Scan vs Jenkins: What are the differences?

## Key Differences between Coverity Scan and Jenkins

Coverity Scan is a static code analysis tool used for identifying security vulnerabilities and quality defects in code by scanning the source code. Jenkins, on the other hand, is an automation server that is used for continuous integration and continuous delivery of software projects.

1. **Purpose**: Coverity Scan focuses solely on static code analysis to identify defects and vulnerabilities in the codebase, while Jenkins is primarily used for automating the build, test, and deployment processes of software projects.

2. **Integration**: Coverity Scan is typically integrated into the software development lifecycle as a standalone tool for code analysis, whereas Jenkins can be integrated with various tools and plugins to support different stages of the software development process.

3. **Workflow Automation**: Jenkins provides a more comprehensive automation platform with support for building, testing, and deploying software, while Coverity Scan is limited to static code analysis and does not offer the same level of automation capabilities.

4. **Real-time Feedback**: Coverity Scan is designed to provide developers with immediate feedback on code quality and security issues during the development phase, whereas Jenkins focuses more on automating the build and deployment processes without real-time code analysis.

5. **Scalability**: Jenkins is known for its ability to scale and support large, complex software projects with multiple teams, while Coverity Scan is more suitable for smaller teams or individual developers working on specific codebases.

6. **Customization**: Jenkins offers a high level of customization through its extensive plugin ecosystem, allowing users to tailor the automation process to their specific requirements, while Coverity Scan has more limited customization options due to its focus on static code analysis.

In Summary, Coverity Scan and Jenkins differ in their purpose, integration, workflow automation, real-time feedback, scalability, and customization options for software development projects.

Coverity Scan vs Jenkins

Overview