Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

C++

16.9K
9.1K
+ 1
845
Xamarin

1.3K
1.5K
+ 1
785
Add tool

C++ vs Xamarin: What are the differences?

Introduction Xamarin and C++ are both popular programming languages used for developing software applications. While they have several similarities, they also have key differences that set them apart.

  1. Syntax and Language Features: One major difference between C++ and Xamarin is the syntax and language features they offer. C++ is a statically typed language that allows low-level programming and provides a high degree of control over memory management. On the other hand, Xamarin uses C# syntax and offers higher-level abstractions, making it easier to develop applications and handle memory management.

  2. Platform-Specific Development: Another significant difference between C++ and Xamarin is the target platform for development. C++ can be used to develop applications for various operating systems, including Windows, macOS, Linux, and even embedded systems. Xamarin, on the other hand, is primarily used for cross-platform development and focuses on creating applications for iOS, Android, and Windows mobile devices.

  3. Development Tools and IDE: C++ development often involves using tools like Code::Blocks or Visual Studio for coding and debugging. Xamarin, on the other hand, provides a dedicated IDE called Xamarin Studio (now merged into Visual Studio) that offers extensive features for cross-platform development, including integrated debugging, code completion, and UI design tools.

  4. Performance and Efficiency: When it comes to performance and efficiency, C++ has an edge over Xamarin. C++ code can be optimized for specific hardware architectures, leading to faster execution and reduced memory consumption. Xamarin, being a cross-platform framework, introduces a slight overhead due to the additional layer of abstraction, resulting in slightly lower performance compared to natively coded applications.

  5. Ecosystem and Community Support: C++ has a rich ecosystem and a large community of developers actively contributing to its libraries and frameworks. There is a vast range of third-party libraries and tools available for C++ development, which makes it easier to integrate with existing systems. Xamarin, while having a smaller community compared to C++, benefits from the extensive .NET ecosystem and community support, providing access to a wide range of libraries and frameworks.

  6. Learning Curve and Development Time: Learning C++ can be challenging due to its complex syntax and low-level programming concepts. It requires a deep understanding of memory management and pointer arithmetic. Xamarin, on the other hand, utilizes C# syntax and leverages the .NET ecosystem, which is considered easier to learn and understand. This can result in shorter development times for Xamarin projects compared to C++.

In summary, C++ and Xamarin differ in terms of syntax, platform support, tools, performance, ecosystem, and learning curve. While C++ offers more control and platform flexibility, Xamarin provides a higher level of abstraction and ease of development, especially for cross-platform mobile applications.

Decisions about C++ and Xamarin
Russtopia Labs
Sr. Doodad Imagineer at Russtopia Labs · | 0 upvote · 198.5K views

As a personal research project I wanted to add post-quantum crypto KEM (key encapsulation) algorithms and new symmetric crypto session algorithms to openssh. I found the openssh code and its channel/context management extremely complex.

Concurrently, I was learning Go. It occurred to me that Go's excellent standard library, including crypto libraries, plus its much safer memory model and string/buffer handling would be better suited to a secure remote shell solution. So I started from scratch, writing a clean-room Go-based solution, without regard for ssh compatibility. Interactive and token-based login, secure copy and tunnels.

Of course, it needs a proper security audit for side channel attacks, protocol vulnerabilities and so on -- but I was impressed by how much simpler a client-server application with crypto and complex terminal handling was in Go.

$ sloc openssh-portable 
  Languages  Files    Code  Comment  Blank   Total  CodeLns
      Total    502  112982    14327  15705  143014   100.0%
          C    389  105938    13349  14416  133703    93.5%
      Shell     92    6118      937   1129    8184     5.7%
       Make     16     468       37    131     636     0.4%
        AWK      1     363        0      7     370     0.3%
        C++      3      79        4     18     101     0.1%
       Conf      1      16        0      4      20     0.0%
$ sloc xs
  Languages  Files  Code  Comment  Blank  Total  CodeLns
      Total     34  3658     1231    655   5544   100.0%
         Go     19  3230     1199    507   4936    89.0%
   Markdown      2   181        0     76    257     4.6%
       Make      7   148        4     50    202     3.6%
       YAML      1    39        0      5     44     0.8%
       Text      1    30        0      7     37     0.7%
     Modula      1    16        0      2     18     0.3%
      Shell      3    14       28      8     50     0.9%

https://gogs.blitter.com/RLabs/xs

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of C++
Pros of Xamarin
  • 202
    Performance
  • 106
    Control over memory allocation
  • 97
    Cross-platform
  • 96
    Fast
  • 84
    Object oriented
  • 57
    Industry standard
  • 47
    Smart pointers
  • 37
    Templates
  • 16
    Gui toolkits
  • 16
    Raii
  • 13
    Generic programming
  • 13
    Control
  • 13
    Flexibility
  • 11
    Metaprogramming
  • 9
    Hardcore
  • 5
    Simple
  • 5
    Full-fledged containers/collections API
  • 5
    Many large libraries
  • 4
    Performant multi-paradigm language
  • 4
    Large number of Libraries
  • 3
    Way too complicated
  • 1
    Close to Reality
  • 1
    Plenty of useful features
  • 121
    Power of c# on mobile devices
  • 81
    Native performance
  • 79
    Native apps with native ui controls
  • 73
    No javascript - truely compiled code
  • 67
    Sharing more than 90% of code over all platforms
  • 45
    Ability to leverage visual studio
  • 44
    Mvvm pattern
  • 44
    Many great c# libraries
  • 36
    Amazing support
  • 34
    Powerful platform for .net developers
  • 19
    GUI Native look and Feel
  • 16
    Nuget package manager
  • 12
    Free
  • 9
    Backed by Microsoft
  • 9
    Enables code reuse on server
  • 8
    Faster Development
  • 7
    Use of third-party .NET libraries
  • 7
    It's free since Apr 2016
  • 7
    Best performance than other cross-platform
  • 7
    Easy Debug and Trace
  • 7
    Open Source
  • 6
    Mac IDE (Xamarin Studio)
  • 6
    Xamarin.forms is the best, it's amazing
  • 5
    That just work for every scenario
  • 5
    C# mult paradigm language
  • 5
    Power of C#, no javascript, visual studio
  • 4
    Great docs
  • 4
    Compatible to develop Hybrid apps
  • 4
    Microsoft stack
  • 4
    Microsoft backed
  • 3
    Well Designed
  • 3
    Small learning curve for Mobile developers
  • 2
    Ionic
  • 2
    Ability to leverage legacy C and C++

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of C++
Cons of Xamarin
  • 8
    Slow compilation
  • 8
    Unsafe
  • 6
    Over-complicated
  • 6
    Fragile ABI
  • 5
    No standard/mainstream dependency management
  • 4
    Templates mess with compilation units
  • 3
    Too low level for most tasks
  • 1
    Compile time features are a mess
  • 1
    Template metaprogramming is insane
  • 1
    Segfaults
  • 1
    Unreal engine
  • 9
    Build times
  • 5
    Visual Studio
  • 4
    Price
  • 3
    Complexity
  • 3
    Scalability
  • 2
    Nuget
  • 2
    Maturity
  • 2
    Build Tools
  • 2
    Support
  • 0
    Maturidade
  • 0
    Performance

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is C++?

C++ compiles directly to a machine's native code, allowing it to be one of the fastest languages in the world, if optimized.

What is Xamarin?

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use C++?
What companies use Xamarin?
See which teams inside your own company are using C++ or Xamarin.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with C++?
What tools integrate with Xamarin?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

May 6 2020 at 6:34AM

Pinterest

JavaScriptC++Varnish+6
5
3365
Oct 24 2019 at 7:43PM

AppSignal

JavaScriptNode.jsJava+8
5
954
GitHubSlackNGINX+15
28
20917
What are some alternatives to C++ and Xamarin?
C lang
Python
Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.
C#
C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.
JavaScript
JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.
HTML5
HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.
See all alternatives