StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Mobile Development
  5. C++ vs Xamarin

C++ vs Xamarin

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Xamarin
Xamarin
Stacks1.3K
Followers1.5K
Votes785
C++
C++
Stacks18.2K
Followers9.4K
Votes866

C++ vs Xamarin: What are the differences?

Introduction Xamarin and C++ are both popular programming languages used for developing software applications. While they have several similarities, they also have key differences that set them apart.

  1. Syntax and Language Features: One major difference between C++ and Xamarin is the syntax and language features they offer. C++ is a statically typed language that allows low-level programming and provides a high degree of control over memory management. On the other hand, Xamarin uses C# syntax and offers higher-level abstractions, making it easier to develop applications and handle memory management.

  2. Platform-Specific Development: Another significant difference between C++ and Xamarin is the target platform for development. C++ can be used to develop applications for various operating systems, including Windows, macOS, Linux, and even embedded systems. Xamarin, on the other hand, is primarily used for cross-platform development and focuses on creating applications for iOS, Android, and Windows mobile devices.

  3. Development Tools and IDE: C++ development often involves using tools like Code::Blocks or Visual Studio for coding and debugging. Xamarin, on the other hand, provides a dedicated IDE called Xamarin Studio (now merged into Visual Studio) that offers extensive features for cross-platform development, including integrated debugging, code completion, and UI design tools.

  4. Performance and Efficiency: When it comes to performance and efficiency, C++ has an edge over Xamarin. C++ code can be optimized for specific hardware architectures, leading to faster execution and reduced memory consumption. Xamarin, being a cross-platform framework, introduces a slight overhead due to the additional layer of abstraction, resulting in slightly lower performance compared to natively coded applications.

  5. Ecosystem and Community Support: C++ has a rich ecosystem and a large community of developers actively contributing to its libraries and frameworks. There is a vast range of third-party libraries and tools available for C++ development, which makes it easier to integrate with existing systems. Xamarin, while having a smaller community compared to C++, benefits from the extensive .NET ecosystem and community support, providing access to a wide range of libraries and frameworks.

  6. Learning Curve and Development Time: Learning C++ can be challenging due to its complex syntax and low-level programming concepts. It requires a deep understanding of memory management and pointer arithmetic. Xamarin, on the other hand, utilizes C# syntax and leverages the .NET ecosystem, which is considered easier to learn and understand. This can result in shorter development times for Xamarin projects compared to C++.

In summary, C++ and Xamarin differ in terms of syntax, platform support, tools, performance, ecosystem, and learning curve. While C++ offers more control and platform flexibility, Xamarin provides a higher level of abstraction and ease of development, especially for cross-platform mobile applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Xamarin, C++

albert
albert

May 5, 2020

Needs advice

I am currently learning Back-End design, and I am confused with the term Back-End API. My question is do I need to have a webserver? That is the Browser send a http request to the Webserver, based on the URL, the Webserver will execute the WEB API and route the request to it and send back the response received from the WEB API to the browser. If so, what are the differences from the WebServer to execute a CGI in the traditional architecture?

If this is not the case, is the WEB API a standalone server/application that can process the HTTP request and send back the response to the browser? Thank you very much for clarifying...

63.7k views63.7k
Comments
Russtopia
Russtopia

Sr. Doodad Imagineer at Russtopia Labs

Dec 8, 2019

Decided

As a personal research project I wanted to add post-quantum crypto KEM (key encapsulation) algorithms and new symmetric crypto session algorithms to openssh. I found the openssh code and its channel/context management extremely complex.

Concurrently, I was learning Go. It occurred to me that Go's excellent standard library, including crypto libraries, plus its much safer memory model and string/buffer handling would be better suited to a secure remote shell solution. So I started from scratch, writing a clean-room Go-based solution, without regard for ssh compatibility. Interactive and token-based login, secure copy and tunnels.

Of course, it needs a proper security audit for side channel attacks, protocol vulnerabilities and so on -- but I was impressed by how much simpler a client-server application with crypto and complex terminal handling was in Go.

<pre> $ sloc openssh-portable Languages Files Code Comment Blank Total CodeLns Total 502 112982 14327 15705 143014 100.0% C 389 105938 13349 14416 133703 93.5% Shell 92 6118 937 1129 8184 5.7% Make 16 468 37 131 636 0.4% AWK 1 363 0 7 370 0.3% C++ 3 79 4 18 101 0.1% Conf 1 16 0 4 20 0.0% $ sloc xs Languages Files Code Comment Blank Total CodeLns Total 34 3658 1231 655 5544 100.0% Go 19 3230 1199 507 4936 89.0% Markdown 2 181 0 76 257 4.6% Make 7 148 4 50 202 3.6% YAML 1 39 0 5 44 0.8% Text 1 30 0 7 37 0.7% Modula 1 16 0 2 18 0.3% Shell 3 14 28 8 50 0.9% </pre>

https://gogs.blitter.com/RLabs/xs

233k views233k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Xamarin
Xamarin
C++
C++

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

C++ compiles directly to a machine's native code, allowing it to be one of the fastest languages in the world, if optimized.

Cross-platform development- Thinking about supporting iOS, Android, Mac and Windows? Xamarin allows you to write it all in C#.;Reuse existing code- Use your favorite .NET libraries in Xamarin apps. Easily use third-party native libraries and frameworks.; Discover as you type- Explore APIs as you type with code autocompletion.;Visual Studio or Xamarin Studio- Create, build, debug, and deploy apps in Visual Studio. Or use Xamarin Studio, a fully-featured IDE that is built for mobile app development.;Native UI, Native Performance- Xamarin delivers high performance compiled code with full access to all the native APIs so you can create native apps with device-specific experiences.; Point and Click UI Design- Xamarin provides a world class Android UI designer. Use Apple Xcode UI designer to create interfaces and Storyboards that automatically sync with your Xamarin.iOS project.
-
Statistics
Stacks
1.3K
Stacks
18.2K
Followers
1.5K
Followers
9.4K
Votes
785
Votes
866
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 121
    Power of c# on mobile devices
  • 81
    Native performance
  • 79
    Native apps with native ui controls
  • 73
    No javascript - truely compiled code
  • 67
    Sharing more than 90% of code over all platforms
Cons
  • 9
    Build times
  • 5
    Visual Studio
  • 4
    Price
  • 3
    Scalability
  • 3
    Complexity
Pros
  • 205
    Performance
  • 108
    Control over memory allocation
  • 99
    Cross-platform
  • 98
    Fast
  • 85
    Object oriented
Cons
  • 8
    Unsafe
  • 8
    Slow compilation
  • 6
    Over-complicated
  • 6
    Fragile ABI
  • 5
    No standard/mainstream dependency management

What are some alternatives to Xamarin, C++?

JavaScript

JavaScript

JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.

Python

Python

Python is a general purpose programming language created by Guido Van Rossum. Python is most praised for its elegant syntax and readable code, if you are just beginning your programming career python suits you best.

PHP

PHP

Fast, flexible and pragmatic, PHP powers everything from your blog to the most popular websites in the world.

Ruby

Ruby

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro “Matz” Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

Java

Java

Java is a programming language and computing platform first released by Sun Microsystems in 1995. There are lots of applications and websites that will not work unless you have Java installed, and more are created every day. Java is fast, secure, and reliable. From laptops to datacenters, game consoles to scientific supercomputers, cell phones to the Internet, Java is everywhere!

Golang

Golang

Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.

HTML5

HTML5

HTML5 is a core technology markup language of the Internet used for structuring and presenting content for the World Wide Web. As of October 2014 this is the final and complete fifth revision of the HTML standard of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The previous version, HTML 4, was standardised in 1997.

C#

C#

C# (pronounced "See Sharp") is a simple, modern, object-oriented, and type-safe programming language. C# has its roots in the C family of languages and will be immediately familiar to C, C++, Java, and JavaScript programmers.

Ionic

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Scala

Scala

Scala is an acronym for “Scalable Language”. This means that Scala grows with you. You can play with it by typing one-line expressions and observing the results. But you can also rely on it for large mission critical systems, as many companies, including Twitter, LinkedIn, or Intel do. To some, Scala feels like a scripting language. Its syntax is concise and low ceremony; its types get out of the way because the compiler can infer them.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase