StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Javascript Utilities And Libraries
  5. CreateJS vs Phaser

CreateJS vs Phaser

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

CreateJS
CreateJS
Stacks12
Followers45
Votes0
Phaser
Phaser
Stacks134
Followers173
Votes4

CreateJS vs Phaser: What are the differences?

Introduction

CreateJS and Phaser are both popular game development frameworks that are used to create interactive games and animations for websites. While they have some similarities, there are key differences between the two frameworks that make them unique in their own way.

  1. Coding Language: CreateJS is built using JavaScript, while Phaser is built using JavaScript and TypeScript. This means that Phaser offers additional features and advantages provided by TypeScript such as static typing, class-based programming, and improved code organization.

  2. Support for Platforms: CreateJS primarily focuses on supporting web platforms, making it suitable for creating games for websites and web browsers. On the other hand, Phaser is a more versatile framework that supports multiple platforms including web, desktop, and mobile. This allows developers to create games that can be played on a wider range of devices and operating systems.

  3. Game Physics: CreateJS provides basic support for game physics through the EaselJS library, allowing developers to add simple collision detection and movement effects to their games. In contrast, Phaser is equipped with a powerful physics engine called Arcade Physics, which provides advanced features such as gravity, acceleration, and velocity for more realistic and complex game physics simulations.

  4. Community and Documentation: Phaser boasts a larger and more active community compared to CreateJS, resulting in a wealth of resources, tutorials, and plugins available for developers. The documentation for Phaser is extensive and well-maintained, making it easier for developers to understand and utilize its features. CreateJS, on the other hand, has a smaller community and documentation may be less comprehensive.

  5. Ease of Use: CreateJS aims to provide an easier learning curve for game development beginners with its intuitive and simple API. It offers a set of modular libraries that can be used individually or together to create games. On the contrary, Phaser follows a more object-oriented and component-based approach, which may require a higher level of programming knowledge and understanding.

  6. Animations and Effects: While both frameworks offer animation support, CreateJS is particularly known for its powerful animation capabilities through the TweenJS library. It provides a comprehensive set of easing functions and timeline-based animations, making it easier to create complex and smooth animations. Phaser also offers animation features, but they may be more focused on game-specific animation needs.

In summary, CreateJS and Phaser both offer game development capabilities for websites, but they differ in terms of coding language, platform support, game physics, community resources, ease of use, and animation features. Whether you choose CreateJS or Phaser would depend on your specific requirements, skill level, and desired platform compatibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

CreateJS
CreateJS
Phaser
Phaser

It is a suite of modular libraries and tools which work together or independently to enable rich interactive content on open web technologies via HTML5. These libraries are interoperable with all modern desktop and mobile browsers, and have been thoroughly tested to achieve performance and reliability in the widest range of browsers possible.

It is a free open source HTML5 game framework. It uses Pixi.js for WebGL and Canvas rendering across desktop and mobile web browsers. Games can be compiled to iOS and Android apps via 3rd party tools.

interoperable with all modern desktop and mobile browsers; tested to achieve performance and reliability in the widest range of browsers;enable rich interactive content
-
Statistics
Stacks
12
Stacks
134
Followers
45
Followers
173
Votes
0
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 1
    Open Source
  • 1
    WebGL and Canvas rendering
  • 1
    JavaScript or TypeScript
  • 1
    Compile to iOS, Android and native apps
Cons
  • 4
    No GUI
Integrations
HTML5
HTML5
JavaScript
JavaScript
Google Chrome
Google Chrome
Firefox
Firefox
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to CreateJS, Phaser?

Underscore

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Deno

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Unity

Unity

Unity is the ultimate game development platform. Use Unity to build high-quality 3D and 2D games, deploy them across mobile, desktop, VR/AR, consoles or the Web, and connect with loyal and enthusiastic players and customers.

Godot

Godot

It is an advanced, feature-packed, multi-platform 2D and 3D open source game engine. It is developed by hundreds of contributors from all around the world.

Chart.js

Chart.js

Visualize your data in 6 different ways. Each of them animated, with a load of customisation options and interactivity extensions.

Unreal Engine

Unreal Engine

It is a game engine that helps you make games. It is made up of several components that work together to drive the game. Its massive system of tools and editors allows you to organize your assets and manipulate them to create the gameplay for your game.

Gamemaker Studio 2

Gamemaker Studio 2

It has everything you need to take your idea from concept to finished game. With no barriers to entry and powerful functionality.

Immutable.js

Immutable.js

Immutable provides Persistent Immutable List, Stack, Map, OrderedMap, Set, OrderedSet and Record. They are highly efficient on modern JavaScript VMs by using structural sharing via hash maps tries and vector tries as popularized by Clojure and Scala, minimizing the need to copy or cache data.

Panda3D

Panda3D

It is a game engine that includes graphics, audio, I/O, collision detection, and other abilities relevant to the creation of 3D games.

pygame

pygame

It is a cross-platform set of Python modules designed for writing video games. It includes computer graphics and sound libraries designed to be used with the Python programming language.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase