Crucible vs GitLab

Overview

GitLab

Stacks63.4K

Followers54.5K

Votes2.5K

GitHub Stars0

Forks0

Crucible

Stacks55

Followers118

Votes12

Crucible vs GitLab: What are the differences?

Crucible vs GitLab

Introduction: In this Markdown document, we will compare Crucible and GitLab, outlining the key differences between the two tools. Below are the six main differences between Crucible and GitLab.

Code Review Process: Crucible is specifically designed as a web-based code review tool that integrates with other version control systems like Git. It provides a collaborative environment for team members to review code changes. On the other hand, GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that includes code review capabilities along with other features such as issue tracking, continuous integration, and deployment.
Repository Management: GitLab is widely known as a Git repository management system and provides a comprehensive interface for managing repositories, branches, and permissions. In comparison, Crucible focuses more on code review and lacks the extensive repository management features offered by GitLab.
Integration with CI/CD: GitLab is equipped with built-in continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) capabilities. It allows developers to automate testing and deployment processes directly from their code repositories. Crucible, however, does not include native CI/CD capabilities. It requires integration with other tools or platforms to achieve similar functionality.
Issue Tracking: GitLab offers a robust issue tracking system that allows developers to create, assign, and track issues alongside their codebase. This integrated approach makes it easier to manage and prioritize tasks within a single platform. On the contrary, Crucible does not include built-in issue tracking functionality and relies on integration with external issue tracking systems.
Community Support: GitLab has a large and active community of developers, contributing to its open-source version and offering support through forums, documentation, and online resources. Meanwhile, Crucible, being a commercial product by Atlassian, has a smaller community base and limited community support options available.
Pricing Model: Both Crucible and GitLab offer commercial licenses for their premium versions. However, GitLab also provides a free and open-source Community Edition that includes most of its core features, making it an attractive option for small teams or open-source projects. Crucible, on the other hand, is only available through paid licenses, making it less accessible for those on a tight budget.

In summary, Crucible is primarily focused on code review processes and lacks extensive repository management, CI/CD, and issue tracking capabilities. GitLab, being a full-fledged DevOps platform, includes these additional features along with a larger community support base and a free Community Edition option.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on GitLab, Crucible

Anonymous

May 25, 2020

Decided

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

624k views624k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Jul 28, 2020

Review

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

944k views944k

Comments

Weverton

CTO at SourceLevel

Aug 3, 2020

Review

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

Pick the correct target branch
Make Drafts explicit
Name things properly
Ask help for tools
Remove the noise
Fetch necessary data
Understand Mergeability
Pass the message
Add screenshots
Be found in the future
Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

1.19M views1.19M

Comments

Detailed Comparison

GitLab	Crucible
GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.	It is a Web-based application primarily aimed at enterprise, and certain features that enable peer review of a code base may be considered enterprise social software.
Manage git repositories with fine grained access controls that keep your code secure;Perform code reviews and enhance collaboration with merge requests;Each project can also have an issue tracker and a wiki;Used by more than 100,000 organizations, GitLab is the most popular solution to manage git repositories on-premises;Completely free and open source (MIT Expat license);Powered by Ruby on Rails	Workflow-based reviews;Quick reviews with cut-and-paste snippets;Create reviews from the command line;One-click reviews from changesets or issues;Threaded comments, inline discussions
Statistics
GitHub Stars 0	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 0	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 63.4K	Stacks 55
Followers 54.5K	Followers 118
Votes 2.5K	Votes 12
Pros & Cons
Pros 508 Self hosted 431 Free 339 Has community edition 242 Easy setup 240 Familiar interface Cons 28 Slow ui performance 9 Introduce breaking bugs every release 6 Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting) 2 Built-in Docker Registry 1 Review Apps feature	Pros 5 JIRA Integration 4 Post-commit preview 2 Has a linux version 1 Pre-commit preview
Integrations
No integrations available	Trello Jira Bitbucket Confluence

What are some alternatives to GitLab, Crucible?

GitHub

GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.

Bitbucket

Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.

Code Climate

After each Git push, Code Climate analyzes your code for complexity, duplication, and common smells to determine changes in quality and surface technical debt hotspots.

Codacy

Codacy automates code reviews and monitors code quality on every commit and pull request on more than 40 programming languages reporting back the impact of every commit or PR, issues concerning code style, best practices and security.

RhodeCode

RhodeCode provides centralized control over distributed code repositories. Developers get code review tools and custom APIs that work in Mercurial, Git & SVN. Firms get unified security and user control so that their CTOs can sleep at night

AWS CodeCommit

CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Phabricator

Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.

Gogs

The goal of this project is to make the easiest, fastest and most painless way to set up a self-hosted Git service. With Go, this can be done in independent binary distribution across ALL platforms that Go supports, including Linux, Mac OS X, and Windows.

Gitea

Git with a cup of tea! Painless self-hosted all-in-one software development service, including Git hosting, code review, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD. It published under the MIT license.

PullReview

PullReview helps Ruby and Rails developers to develop new features cleanly, on-time, and with confidence by automatically reviewing their code.

Related Comparisons

Crucible vs GitLab: What are the differences?

Crucible vs GitLab

Introduction: In this Markdown document, we will compare Crucible and GitLab, outlining the key differences between the two tools. Below are the six main differences between Crucible and GitLab.

Code Review Process: Crucible is specifically designed as a web-based code review tool that integrates with other version control systems like Git. It provides a collaborative environment for team members to review code changes. On the other hand, GitLab is a complete DevOps platform that includes code review capabilities along with other features such as issue tracking, continuous integration, and deployment.
Repository Management: GitLab is widely known as a Git repository management system and provides a comprehensive interface for managing repositories, branches, and permissions. In comparison, Crucible focuses more on code review and lacks the extensive repository management features offered by GitLab.
Integration with CI/CD: GitLab is equipped with built-in continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) capabilities. It allows developers to automate testing and deployment processes directly from their code repositories. Crucible, however, does not include native CI/CD capabilities. It requires integration with other tools or platforms to achieve similar functionality.
Issue Tracking: GitLab offers a robust issue tracking system that allows developers to create, assign, and track issues alongside their codebase. This integrated approach makes it easier to manage and prioritize tasks within a single platform. On the contrary, Crucible does not include built-in issue tracking functionality and relies on integration with external issue tracking systems.
Community Support: GitLab has a large and active community of developers, contributing to its open-source version and offering support through forums, documentation, and online resources. Meanwhile, Crucible, being a commercial product by Atlassian, has a smaller community base and limited community support options available.
Pricing Model: Both Crucible and GitLab offer commercial licenses for their premium versions. However, GitLab also provides a free and open-source Community Edition that includes most of its core features, making it an attractive option for small teams or open-source projects. Crucible, on the other hand, is only available through paid licenses, making it less accessible for those on a tight budget.

Crucible vs GitLab

Overview

Crucible vs GitLab: What are the differences?