Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Cucumber

982
925
+ 1
36
Mockito

1.8K
179
+ 1
0
Add tool

Cucumber vs Mockito: What are the differences?

Cucumber and Mockito are two popular testing frameworks in the software development industry. Both frameworks are used for different purposes and have distinct features that set them apart from each other.

  1. Behavior-Driven Development: Cucumber is primarily designed for Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) testing. It allows the creation of test scenarios using natural language, making it more readable and understandable for non-technical stakeholders. On the other hand, Mockito is primarily used for unit testing and focuses on isolating the behavior of an object or method during testing.

  2. Test Implementation: When using Cucumber, tests are written in feature files using Gherkin syntax. These feature files contain a combination of plain English and keywords that represent test steps. In contrast, Mockito does not employ natural language test specifications. It allows developers to write test cases directly in code using Mockito API.

  3. Test Scope: Cucumber is often used to test user acceptance and integration scenarios, as it can handle end-to-end testing in a more user-friendly manner. Conversely, Mockito is mainly used for testing isolated units of code, such as individual methods or classes, without having to rely on complex external dependencies.

  4. Collaboration and Communication: Cucumber promotes collaboration between non-technical and technical stakeholders by providing a shared language for describing and understanding product behavior. It serves as a bridge between the business and development teams. Mockito, however, focuses more on technical aspects by providing a flexible and powerful mocking framework for creating realistic test environments.

  5. Integration with Other Tools: Cucumber can integrate with various tools like Selenium for browser automation, which makes it suitable for testing web applications. Mockito, on the other hand, integrates well with popular testing frameworks such as JUnit and TestNG, allowing seamless test execution and result reporting.

  6. Test Double Usages: Cucumber does not offer built-in support for test doubles like mocks and stubs. It focuses more on the interaction of end-to-end scenarios. In contrast, Mockito specializes in creating mock objects, stubs, and spies, making it ideal for mocking dependencies and testing isolated units of code.

In Summary, Cucumber is a BDD testing framework that emphasizes readable and understandable test scenarios using natural language, while Mockito is a framework for unit testing that allows isolation of code behavior using mocks and stubs.

Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of Cucumber
Pros of Mockito
  • 20
    Simple Syntax
  • 8
    Simple usage
  • 5
    Huge community
  • 3
    Nice report
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Cucumber?

    Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

    What is Mockito?

    It is a mocking framework that tastes really good. It lets you write beautiful tests with a clean & simple API. It doesn’t give you hangover because the tests are very readable and they produce clean verification errors.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Cucumber?
    What companies use Mockito?
    Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
    Learn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Cucumber?
    What tools integrate with Mockito?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Cucumber and Mockito?
    Selenium
    Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
    RSpec
    Behaviour Driven Development for Ruby. Making TDD Productive and Fun.
    TestNG
    It is a testing framework designed to simplify a broad range of testing needs, it covers all categories of tests: unit, functional, end-to-end, integration, etc.Run your tests in arbitrarily big thread pools with various policies available (all methods in their own thread, one thread per test class, etc.
    JUnit
    JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks.
    Celery
    Celery is an asynchronous task queue/job queue based on distributed message passing. It is focused on real-time operation, but supports scheduling as well.
    See all alternatives