StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. DevOps
  3. Testing Frameworks
  4. Testing Frameworks
  5. Cypress vs TestCafe

Cypress vs TestCafe

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

TestCafe
TestCafe
Stacks262
Followers273
Votes26
GitHub Stars9.9K
Forks678
Cypress
Cypress
Stacks3.5K
Followers2.0K
Votes115
GitHub Stars49.4K
Forks3.4K

Cypress vs TestCafe: What are the differences?

Introduction

Cypress and TestCafe are two commonly used frameworks for web application testing. While they both serve the purpose of testing web applications, there are key differences between the two. In this article, we will explore and highlight six of these differences.

  1. Architecture: Cypress runs directly in the browser and runs inside the application’s context, allowing direct access to the Document Object Model (DOM). On the other hand, TestCafe uses iframes to execute tests and communicates with the browser using built-in transport mechanisms. This difference in architecture affects how tests are written and executed.

  2. Programming Language: Cypress is mainly written in JavaScript and enables test authors to write tests using JavaScript. TestCafe, on the other hand, supports a wider range of programming languages such as JavaScript, TypeScript, and CoffeeScript. This allows teams to choose the language they are most comfortable with for writing their tests.

  3. Assertions and Selectors: Cypress makes use of a jQuery-like API for making assertions and selecting elements on the page. In contrast, TestCafe uses a built-in mechanism for assertions and provides a powerful selector system that doesn't require any libraries or additional dependencies.

  4. Cross-browser Testing: TestCafe provides built-in cross-browser support, allowing tests to be run on multiple browsers without the need for additional configuration. Cypress, on the other hand, requires additional setup and configuration to run tests on different browsers.

  5. Waiting for Element Availability: Cypress automatically waits for elements to become available before performing assertions or interactions. This eliminates the need for explicit waits and makes tests more reliable and deterministic. In TestCafe, explicit waits are required to ensure elements are available before interacting with them.

  6. Debugging and Testing Tools: Cypress provides a rich set of built-in tools for debugging tests, including real-time reloading, automatic screenshots, and video recordings of test runs. TestCafe, on the other hand, provides a simpler debugging experience and does not offer the same level of visual tools for debugging and testing.

In Summary, Cypress and TestCafe differ in architecture, programming language support, assertions and selectors, cross-browser testing, element availability handling, and debugging/testing tools. These differences make each framework suitable for different use cases and user preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on TestCafe, Cypress

Dane
Dane

Feb 7, 2020

Needs adviceonCypressCypressJestJest

As we all know testing is an important part of any application. To assist with our testing we are going to use both Cypress and Jest. We feel these tools complement each other and will help us get good coverage of our code. We will use Cypress for our end to end testing as we've found it quite user friendly. Jest will be used for our unit tests because we've seen how many larger companies use it with great success.

836k views836k
Comments
Yildiz
Yildiz

testmanager/automation tester at medicalservice

May 12, 2020

Needs adviceonAngularJSAngularJSTypeScriptTypeScriptCypressCypress

In the company I will be building test automation framework and my new company develops apps mainly using AngularJS/TypeScript. I was planning to build Protractor-Jasmine framework but a friend of mine told me about Cypress and heard that its users are very satisfied with it. I am trying to understand the capabilities of Cypress and as the final goal to differentiate these two tools. Can anyone advice me on this in a nutshell pls...

277k views277k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

TestCafe
TestCafe
Cypress
Cypress

It is a pure node.js end-to-end solution for testing web apps. It takes care of all the stages: starting browsers, running tests, gathering test results and generating reports.

Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.

Create stable tests (and no manual timeouts); Write in latest JS or TypeScript; Detect JS errors in your code; Launch concurrent tests; Build readable tests with PageObject; Include tests in continuous integration system; Rapid test development
Time Travel; Debuggability; Automatic Waiting; Spies, Stubs, and Clocks; Network Traffic Control; Consistent Results; Screenshots and Videos
Statistics
GitHub Stars
9.9K
GitHub Stars
49.4K
GitHub Forks
678
GitHub Forks
3.4K
Stacks
262
Stacks
3.5K
Followers
273
Followers
2.0K
Votes
26
Votes
115
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 8
    Cross-browser testing
  • 4
    Open source
  • 4
    Easy setup/installation
  • 4
    Built in waits
  • 3
    UI End to End testing
Cons
  • 9
    No longer free
Pros
  • 29
    Open source
  • 22
    Great documentation
  • 20
    Simple usage
  • 18
    Fast
  • 10
    Cross Browser testing
Cons
  • 21
    Cypress is weak at cross-browser testing
  • 14
    Switch tabs : Cypress can'nt support
  • 12
    No iFrame support
  • 9
    No page object support
  • 9
    No multiple domain support
Integrations
TypeScript
TypeScript
JavaScript
JavaScript
Jenkins
Jenkins
Travis CI
Travis CI
TeamCity
TeamCity
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to TestCafe, Cypress?

Mocha

Mocha

Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

Jasmine

Jasmine

Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.

Jest

Jest

Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

Robot Framework

Robot Framework

It is a generic test automation framework for acceptance testing and acceptance test-driven development. It has easy-to-use tabular test data syntax and it utilizes the keyword-driven testing approach. Its testing capabilities can be extended by test libraries implemented either with Python or Java, and users can create new higher-level keywords from existing ones using the same syntax that is used for creating test cases.

Karate DSL

Karate DSL

Combines API test-automation, mocks and performance-testing into a single, unified framework. The BDD syntax popularized by Cucumber is language-neutral, and easy for even non-programmers. Besides powerful JSON & XML assertions, you can run tests in parallel for speed - which is critical for HTTP API testing.

CodeceptJS

CodeceptJS

It is a modern end to end testing framework with a special BDD-style syntax. The test is written as a linear scenario of user's action on a site. Each test is described inside a Scenario function with I object passed into it.

Cucumber

Cucumber

Cucumber is a tool that supports Behaviour-Driven Development (BDD) - a software development process that aims to enhance software quality and reduce maintenance costs.

Protractor

Protractor

Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.

AVA

AVA

Even though JavaScript is single-threaded, IO in Node.js can happen in parallel due to its async nature. AVA takes advantage of this and runs your tests concurrently, which is especially beneficial for IO heavy tests. In addition, test files are run in parallel as separate processes, giving you even better performance and an isolated environment for each test file.

Spock Framework

Spock Framework

It is a testing and specification framework for Java and Groovy applications. What makes it stand out from the crowd is its beautiful and highly expressive specification language. It is compatible with most IDEs, build tools, and continuous integration servers.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana